Wearable robotic exoskeleton for gait reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury: A literature review.

Gait reconstruction Paraplegia Tetraplegia Wearable robotic exoskeleton

Journal

Journal of orthopaedic translation
ISSN: 2214-031X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Translat
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101625127

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 25 09 2020
revised: 25 12 2020
accepted: 07 01 2021
entrez: 15 3 2021
pubmed: 16 3 2021
medline: 16 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wearable robotic exoskeletons (WREs) have been globally developed to achieve gait reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The present study aimed to enable evidence-based decision-making in selecting the optimal WRE according to residual motor function and to provide a new perspective on further development of appropriate WREs. The current review was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant studies published from April 2015 to February 2020. Selected studies were analysed with a focus on the participants' neurological level of SCI, amount of training (number of training sessions and duration of the total training period), gait speed and endurance achieved, and subgroup exploration of the number of persons for assistance and the walking aid used among patients with cervical level injury. A total of 28 articles (nine using Ekso, three using Indego, ten using ReWalk, one using REX, five using Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor) involving 228 patients were included in the analysis. Across all WREs, T6 was the most frequently reported level of SCI. The amount of training showed a wide distribution (number of training sessions: 2-230 sessions [30-120 min per session]; duration of the total training period: 1-24 weeks [1-5 times per week]). The mean gait speed was 0.31 m/s (standard deviation [SD] 0.14), and the mean distance on the 6-min walking test as a measure of endurance was 108.9 m (SD 46.7). The subgroup exploration aimed at patients with cervical level injury indicated that 59.2% of patients were able to ambulate with no physical assistance and several patients used a walker as a walking aid. The number of cervical level injury increased, as compared to the number previously indicated by a prior similar review. Training procedure was largely different among studies. Further improvement based on gait performance is required for use and dissemination in daily life. The present review reveals the current state of the clinical effectiveness of WREs for gait reconstruction in patients with SCI, contributing to evidence-based device application and further development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33717982
doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.01.001
pii: S2214-031X(21)00001-2
pmc: PMC7930505
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

55-64

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Références

Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):905-18
pubmed: 24952008
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Mar 22;9:455-66
pubmed: 27042146
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 20;15(1):109
pubmed: 30458839
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):147-58
pubmed: 26230182
Iran J Med Sci. 2011 Dec;36(4):242-53
pubmed: 23115408
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 27;39(2):277-83
pubmed: 27372363
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017 Summer;23(3):234-244
pubmed: 29339899
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018 Apr 27;4:36
pubmed: 29736262
Paraplegia. 1995 Apr;33(4):183-8
pubmed: 7609973
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017 Summer;23(3):245-255
pubmed: 29339900
J Vis Exp. 2016 Jun 16;(112):
pubmed: 27340808
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(3):447-62
pubmed: 19675995
J Orthop Translat. 2017 Mar 23;11:7-18
pubmed: 29662765
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May-Jun;75(3):198-203
pubmed: 8663927
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Mar 1;15(1):12
pubmed: 29490678
Spinal Cord. 2007 Jan;45(1):57-63
pubmed: 16819556
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2015 Dec 4;1:2333721415618858
pubmed: 28138480
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Jan-Feb;39(1):53-61
pubmed: 11926327
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 23;15(1):112
pubmed: 30470238
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):145
pubmed: 31752911
J Orthop Translat. 2015 Oct 17;5:26-37
pubmed: 30035072
Spinal Cord. 2013 May;51(5):356-9
pubmed: 23247013
J Rehabil Med. 2018 Sep 28;50(9):806-813
pubmed: 30183055
Neurotherapeutics. 2018 Jul;15(3):604-617
pubmed: 29987763
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):867-76
pubmed: 10453761
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2016 Jan 07;2:15025
pubmed: 28053728
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(1):85-95
pubmed: 28527225
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Jan;41(1):48-54
pubmed: 27748162
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8459018
pubmed: 27610382
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004 Apr;28(1):69-74
pubmed: 15171582
Physiotherapy. 2011 Sep;97(3):182-9
pubmed: 21820535
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):93-9
pubmed: 26364278
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Winter;24(1):78-85
pubmed: 29434463
Front Neurosci. 2018 Feb 15;12:78
pubmed: 29497359
J Neural Eng. 2016 Jun;13(3):031001
pubmed: 27064508
Global Spine J. 2016 Dec;6(8):822-841
pubmed: 27853668
Paraplegia. 1995 Jul;33(7):409-15
pubmed: 7478731
Spinal Cord. 2012 Jul;50(7):548-52
pubmed: 22310321
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):122-32
pubmed: 26364281
Spinal Cord. 2016 Feb;54(2):120-5
pubmed: 26261073
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(1):99-106
pubmed: 23949036
Phys Ther. 2004 Jun;84(6):496-509
pubmed: 15161416
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jan;74(1):73-8
pubmed: 8420525
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jul 19;16(1):94
pubmed: 31324256
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015 Mar;23(2):277-86
pubmed: 25373109
Clin Rehabil. 2016 Jan;30(1):73-84
pubmed: 25761635
PM R. 2017 Jan;9(1):46-62
pubmed: 27565639
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1):113-120
pubmed: 31568761
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):110-21
pubmed: 26364280
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jun;78(6):582-6
pubmed: 9196464
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2012 Dec;10(4):278-85
pubmed: 22983921
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;158(5 Pt 1):1384-7
pubmed: 9817683
Spinal Cord. 2019 Jun;57(6):509-515
pubmed: 30733575
Asian Spine J. 2019 Feb;13(1):96-102
pubmed: 30326698
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Aug;76(8):779-83
pubmed: 7632135
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jun 19;14(1):60
pubmed: 28629390
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Jan;8(1):84-91
pubmed: 22612673
Spinal Cord. 2010 Jan;48(1):27-33
pubmed: 19488052
Spinal Cord. 2000 Sep;38(9):555-8
pubmed: 11035478
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Dec 4;14(1):126
pubmed: 29202845
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Apr;55(2):209-216
pubmed: 30156088

Auteurs

Koki Tan (K)

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Soichiro Koyama (S)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Hiroaki Sakurai (H)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Toshio Teranishi (T)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Yoshikiyo Kanada (Y)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Shigeo Tanabe (S)

Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Classifications MeSH