KRAS
KRAS mutations
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
TP53 mutations
checkpoint inhibitors
Journal
Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
3
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pembrolizumab is a standard of care as first line palliative therapy in PD-L1 overexpressing (≥50%) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed at the identification of KRAS and TP53-defined mutational subgroups in the PD-L1 high population to distinguish long-term responders from those with limited benefit. In this retrospective, observational study, patients from 4 certified lung cancer centers in Berlin, Germany, having received pembrolizumab monotherapy as first line palliative treatment for lung adenocarcinoma (LuAD) from 2017 to 2018, with PD-L1 expression status and targeted NGS data available, were evaluated. A total of 119 patients were included. Rates for KRAS, TP53 and combined mutations were 52.1%, 47.1% and 21.9%, respectively, with no association given between KRAS and TP53 mutations (P=0.24). By trend, PD-L1 expression was higher in KRAS-positive patients (75% A comprehensive assessment of KRAS subtypes and TP53 mutations allows a highly relevant prognostic differentiation of patients with metastatic, PD-L1 high LuAD treated upfront with pembrolizumab.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pembrolizumab is a standard of care as first line palliative therapy in PD-L1 overexpressing (≥50%) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed at the identification of KRAS and TP53-defined mutational subgroups in the PD-L1 high population to distinguish long-term responders from those with limited benefit.
METHODS
METHODS
In this retrospective, observational study, patients from 4 certified lung cancer centers in Berlin, Germany, having received pembrolizumab monotherapy as first line palliative treatment for lung adenocarcinoma (LuAD) from 2017 to 2018, with PD-L1 expression status and targeted NGS data available, were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 119 patients were included. Rates for KRAS, TP53 and combined mutations were 52.1%, 47.1% and 21.9%, respectively, with no association given between KRAS and TP53 mutations (P=0.24). By trend, PD-L1 expression was higher in KRAS-positive patients (75%
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A comprehensive assessment of KRAS subtypes and TP53 mutations allows a highly relevant prognostic differentiation of patients with metastatic, PD-L1 high LuAD treated upfront with pembrolizumab.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33718018
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-958
pii: tlcr-10-02-737
pmc: PMC7947421
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
737-752Informations de copyright
2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-958). NF reports personal fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees and other from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees and other from AbbVie, personal fees and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche Pharma, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from Takeda, all outside the submitted work. JK reports being an advisory Board member without receiving any personal fees for: Roche Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda and Lilly Oncology, all outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Cancer Discov. 2018 Jul;8(7):822-835
pubmed: 29773717
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):124-8
pubmed: 25765070
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 May;14(5):876-889
pubmed: 30735816
Cancer Lett. 2020 Feb 1;470:95-105
pubmed: 31644929
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;37(7):537-546
pubmed: 30620668
Cancer Discov. 2017 Jun;7(6):596-609
pubmed: 28336552
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Sep 15;14(18):5731-4
pubmed: 18794081
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 May;8(5):530-42
pubmed: 23524403
Oncotarget. 2019 Nov 12;10(61):6604-6622
pubmed: 31762941
Nature. 2012 Sep 27;489(7417):519-25
pubmed: 22960745
Immunity. 2017 Dec 19;47(6):1083-1099.e6
pubmed: 29246442
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):202-206
pubmed: 30643254
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2371-6
pubmed: 23723294
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 15;23(12):3012-3024
pubmed: 28039262
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jun;14(6):1095-1101
pubmed: 30738221
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:
pubmed: 31428721
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):75-82
pubmed: 27687306
Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 05;9:1161
pubmed: 31750249
Ann Oncol. 2020 May;31(5):599-608
pubmed: 32178965
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jul;10(7):1049-57
pubmed: 26102443
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:
pubmed: 31832578
Histopathology. 2020 May;76(6):793-802
pubmed: 31793055
Lung Cancer. 2016 Jul;97:73-80
pubmed: 27237031
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):217-223
pubmed: 31666701
Lung Cancer. 2019 Jul;133:144-150
pubmed: 31200821
ESMO Open. 2019 Jan 24;4(1):e000442
pubmed: 30792906
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jan;10(1):54-71
pubmed: 31658955
Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1441-1448
pubmed: 30082870
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):805-12
pubmed: 27100819
Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1653-1659
pubmed: 31435660
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2020-2031
pubmed: 31562796
Cancer Discov. 2015 Aug;5(8):860-77
pubmed: 26069186
Lung Cancer. 2019 Jun;132:65-71
pubmed: 31097096
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):415-21
pubmed: 23945592
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jan;120(1):57-62
pubmed: 30377342
Pathologe. 2016 Nov;37(6):557-567
pubmed: 27510417
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2019 Nov-Dec;16(6):577-582
pubmed: 31659111
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 12;10:142
pubmed: 32117779
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):48248-48252
pubmed: 28525386