Reducing Pediatric ED Length of Stay by Reducing Diagnostic Testing: A Discrete Event Simulation Model.
Journal
Pediatric quality & safety
ISSN: 2472-0054
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Qual Saf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101702480
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
11
02
2020
accepted:
16
10
2020
entrez:
15
3
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quality improvement efforts can require significant investment before the system impact of those efforts can be evaluated. We used discrete event simulation (DES) modeling to test the theoretical impact of a proposed initiative to reduce diagnostic testing for low-acuity pediatric emergency department (ED) patients. We modified an existing DES model, built at another large, urban, academic pediatric ED, to forecast the impact of reducing diagnostic testing rates on mean ED length of stay (LOS). The modified model included local testing rates for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 4 and 5 patients and additional processes defined by local experts. Validation was performed by comparing model output predictions of mean LOS and wait times to actual site-specific data. We determined the goal reduction in diagnostic testing rates using the Achievable Benchmark of Care methodology. Model output mean LOS and wait times, with testing set at benchmark rates, were compared to outputs with testing set at current levels. During validation testing, model output metrics approximated actual clinical data with no statistically significant differences. Compared to model outputs with current testing rates, the mean LOS with testing set at an achievable benchmark was significantly shorter for ESI 4 (difference 19.1 mins [95% confidence interval 12.2, 26.0]) patients. A DES model predicted a statistically significant decrease in mean LOS for ESI 4 pediatric ED patients if diagnostic testing is performed at an achievable benchmark rate compared to current rates. DES shows promise as a tool to evaluate the impact of a QI initiative before implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33718751
doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000396
pmc: PMC7952107
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e396Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Références
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 May;19(5):525-34
pubmed: 22594356
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):31-5
pubmed: 24324280
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e013869
pubmed: 28588107
Emerg Med J. 2020 Apr;37(4):193-199
pubmed: 31915264
Emerg Med J. 2013 Feb;30(2):134-8
pubmed: 22398851
CJEM. 2003 May;5(3):155-61
pubmed: 17472779
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;74(3):357-364
pubmed: 30579619
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;62(4):340-50
pubmed: 23787210
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;72(4):410-419
pubmed: 29804715
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2233-4
pubmed: 26624821
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1386-91
pubmed: 25661577
J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Aug;5(3):269-81
pubmed: 10461579
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Oct;157(10):978-83
pubmed: 14557158
Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):43-9
pubmed: 22182923
Chest. 2000 Aug;118(2 Suppl):8S-17S
pubmed: 10939994
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;71(4):497-505.e4
pubmed: 28844764
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 16;16:3
pubmed: 26772169
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;20(11):1112-20
pubmed: 24238313
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):38-46
pubmed: 25565488
JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2871-9
pubmed: 11401608