Transition of Renal Patients Using AlloSure Into Community Kidney Care (TRACK): Protocol for Long-Term Allograft Surveillance in Renal Transplant Recipients.
acute rejection
allograft injury
allograft surveillance
donor-derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA)
graft rejection
injury
kidney
kidney disease
molecular inflammation
molecular injury
renal
renal transplant
transplant
transplantation
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2021
15 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
21
11
2020
accepted:
21
01
2021
revised:
23
12
2020
entrez:
15
3
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with end-stage kidney disease require complex and expensive medical management. Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage kidney disease and is considered superior to all other modalities of renal replacement therapy or dialysis. However, access to kidney transplant is limited by critical supply and demand, making it extremely important to ensure longevity of transplanted kidneys. This is prevented through lifelong immunosuppression, with caution not to overly suppress the immune system, resulting in toxicity and harm. Transition of care to community nephrologists after initial kidney transplantation and monitoring at a transplant center is an important process to ensure delivery of effective and patient-centric care closer to home. Once transplanted, laborious surveillance of the immune system and monitoring for potential rejection and injury are undertaken through an armamentarium of screening modalities. Posttransplant surveillance for kidney function and injury remains key to follow-up care. While kidney function, quantified by estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine, and kidney injury, measured by proteinuria and hematuria, are standard biomarkers used to monitor injury and rejection posttransplant, they have recently been demonstrated to be inferior in performance to that of AlloSure (CareDx Inc, Brisbane, CA) circulating donor-derived, cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). The outcomes and methods of monitoring renal transplant recipients posttransplant have remained stagnant over the past 15 years. The aim of this study is to consider intensive surveillance using AlloSure dd-cfDNA in an actively managed protocol, assessing whether it increases long-term allograft survival in kidney transplant recipients compared with current standard clinical care in community nephrology. The study protocol will acquire data from a phase IV observational trial to assess a cohort of renal transplant patients managed using AlloSure dd-cfDNA and patient care managers versus 1000 propensity-matched historic controls using United Network for Organ Sharing U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. Data will be managed in a centralized electronic data server. The primary outcome will be superior allograft survival, as a composite of return to dialysis, retransplant, death due to allograft failure, and death with a functional graft (infection, malignancy, and cardiovascular death). The secondary endpoints will assess improved kidney function through decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate and immune activity through development of donor-specific antibodies. The total sample is anticipated to be 3500 (2500 patients managed with AlloSure dd-cfDNA and 1000 propensity-matched controls). Active enrollment began in November 2020. Based on a significant literature base, we believe implementing the surveillance of dd-cfDNA in the kidney transplant population will have a positive impact on graft survival. Through early identification of rejection and facilitating timely intervention, prolongation of allograft survival versus those not managed by dd-cfDNA surveillance protocol should be superior. PRR1-10.2196/25941.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients with end-stage kidney disease require complex and expensive medical management. Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage kidney disease and is considered superior to all other modalities of renal replacement therapy or dialysis. However, access to kidney transplant is limited by critical supply and demand, making it extremely important to ensure longevity of transplanted kidneys. This is prevented through lifelong immunosuppression, with caution not to overly suppress the immune system, resulting in toxicity and harm. Transition of care to community nephrologists after initial kidney transplantation and monitoring at a transplant center is an important process to ensure delivery of effective and patient-centric care closer to home. Once transplanted, laborious surveillance of the immune system and monitoring for potential rejection and injury are undertaken through an armamentarium of screening modalities. Posttransplant surveillance for kidney function and injury remains key to follow-up care. While kidney function, quantified by estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine, and kidney injury, measured by proteinuria and hematuria, are standard biomarkers used to monitor injury and rejection posttransplant, they have recently been demonstrated to be inferior in performance to that of AlloSure (CareDx Inc, Brisbane, CA) circulating donor-derived, cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA).
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The outcomes and methods of monitoring renal transplant recipients posttransplant have remained stagnant over the past 15 years. The aim of this study is to consider intensive surveillance using AlloSure dd-cfDNA in an actively managed protocol, assessing whether it increases long-term allograft survival in kidney transplant recipients compared with current standard clinical care in community nephrology.
METHODS
METHODS
The study protocol will acquire data from a phase IV observational trial to assess a cohort of renal transplant patients managed using AlloSure dd-cfDNA and patient care managers versus 1000 propensity-matched historic controls using United Network for Organ Sharing U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. Data will be managed in a centralized electronic data server. The primary outcome will be superior allograft survival, as a composite of return to dialysis, retransplant, death due to allograft failure, and death with a functional graft (infection, malignancy, and cardiovascular death). The secondary endpoints will assess improved kidney function through decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate and immune activity through development of donor-specific antibodies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The total sample is anticipated to be 3500 (2500 patients managed with AlloSure dd-cfDNA and 1000 propensity-matched controls). Active enrollment began in November 2020.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Based on a significant literature base, we believe implementing the surveillance of dd-cfDNA in the kidney transplant population will have a positive impact on graft survival. Through early identification of rejection and facilitating timely intervention, prolongation of allograft survival versus those not managed by dd-cfDNA surveillance protocol should be superior.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
PRR1-10.2196/25941.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33720033
pii: v10i3e25941
doi: 10.2196/25941
pmc: PMC8088876
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e25941Informations de copyright
©Bethany L Dale, Subhasish Bose, Sheng Kuo, Alana Burns, Pierre Daou, Jenna Short, Jake Miles. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 15.03.2021.
Références
Am J Transplant. 2011 Oct;11(10):2093-109
pubmed: 21883901
Transplantation. 2002 Nov 27;74(10):1377-81
pubmed: 12451234
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Jun 28;30:390
pubmed: 27493934
Transplant Direct. 2020 Jul 15;6(8):e580
pubmed: 33134504
Transplant Direct. 2018 Aug 20;4(9):e379
pubmed: 30234148
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 23;8(1):
pubmed: 30583588
Am J Transplant. 2020 Sep;20(9):2491-2498
pubmed: 32056331
Transplant Direct. 2020 Oct 23;6(11):e622
pubmed: 33134498
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19 Suppl 2:19-123
pubmed: 30811893
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jun;19(6):1663-1670
pubmed: 30725531
Am J Transplant. 2020 Aug;20(8):2264-2268
pubmed: 32185872
Transplantation. 2019 Apr;103(4):e61
pubmed: 30747838
Ochsner J. 2017 Spring;17(1):46-55
pubmed: 28331448
Transplant Direct. 2020 Jun 11;6(7):e568
pubmed: 32766423
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 2;341(23):1725-30
pubmed: 10580071
J Investig Med. 2017 Oct;65(7):1049-1056
pubmed: 28483983
Br Med Bull. 2013;106:117-34
pubmed: 23645842
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1948 Feb;142(3-4):241-3
pubmed: 18875018
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jul;28(7):2221-2232
pubmed: 28280140