Comparison of In Situ Hybridization, Immunohistochemistry, and Reverse Transcription-Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Testing in Tissue.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
COVID-19 Testing
/ methods
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
In Situ Hybridization
/ methods
Lung
/ virology
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
RNA, Viral
/ isolation & purification
Reproducibility of Results
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
SARS-CoV-2
/ genetics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Journal
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1543-2165
Titre abrégé: Arch Pathol Lab Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7607091
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2021
01 07 2021
Historique:
accepted:
09
03
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
15
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Small case series have evaluated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or RNA in situ hybridization (RNAish). To compare droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, IHC, and RNAish to detect SARS-CoV-2 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in a large series of lung specimens from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and RNAish used commercially available probes; IHC used clone 1A9. Twenty-six autopsies of COVID-19 patients with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 62 lung specimens, 22 heart specimens, 2 brain specimens, and 1 liver, and 1 umbilical cord were included. Control cases included 9 autopsy lungs from patients with other infections/inflammation and virus-infected tissue or cell lines. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction had the highest sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 (96%) when compared with IHC (31%) and RNAish (36%). All 3 tests had a specificity of 100%. Agreement between droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and IHC or RNAish was fair (κ = 0.23 and κ = 0.35, respectively). Agreement between IHC and in situ hybridization was substantial (κ = 0.75). Interobserver reliability was almost perfect for IHC (κ = 0.91) and fair to moderate for RNAish (κ = 0.38-0.59). Lung tissues from patients who died earlier after onset of symptoms revealed higher copy numbers by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (P = .03, Pearson correlation = -0.65) and were more likely to be positive by RNAish (P = .02) than lungs from patients who died later. We identified SARS-CoV-2 in hyaline membranes, in pneumocytes, and rarely in respiratory epithelium. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction showed low copy numbers in 7 autopsy hearts from ProteoGenex Inc. All other extrapulmonary tissues were negative. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction was the most sensitive and highly specific test to identify SARS-CoV-2 in lung specimens from COVID-19 patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33720333
pii: 462833
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0008-SA
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM