Reported and Unreported Potentially Important Incidental Findings in Urgent Nonenhanced Abdominal CT for Renal Colic.
Abdominal CT
Incidental finding
Nephrolithiasis
Radiology
Reporting
Journal
Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre
ISSN: 1423-0151
Titre abrégé: Med Princ Pract
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8901334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
03
2020
accepted:
14
03
2021
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
31
3
2022
entrez:
15
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the prevalence of reported and unreported potentially important incidental findings (PIFs) in consecutive nonenhanced abdominal CTs performed specifically for renal colic in the urgent setting. One radiologist, blinded to the finalized report, retrospectively re-evaluated nonenhanced abdominal CTs performed from January to December 2017 on adult patients from the emergency department with the specific request of urgent evaluation for renal colic, searching for PIFs. The CTs of 312 patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight findings were reported in 38 different CTs, whereas the re-evaluation added 47 unreported findings in 47 different CTs, adding to total of 85 findings (27%). The difference in the proportion of reported and unreported PIFs between the original report and re-evaluation was significant (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the age of patients with and without reported findings. The proportion of potentially important findings did not vary significantly among the 3 shifts in the original report and in re-evaluation. The most frequent findings, both reported and unreported, were pleural effusion, lymphadenopathies, and liver nodules. Potentially important additional findings are frequently present in urgent nonenhanced abdominal CTs performed for renal colic, and many are not described in the finalized reports. Radiologists should take care not to underreport PIFs even in the urgent setting because of the possible consequences on the patient's health and in order to avoid legal issues, while at the same time satisfying the need for timely and efficient reporting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33721865
pii: 000515852
doi: 10.1159/000515852
pmc: PMC8436713
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
355-360Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Références
Invest Radiol. 1990 Feb;25(2):133-40
pubmed: 2312249
Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):3-9
pubmed: 15987959
J Thorac Imaging. 2018 May;33(3):168-175
pubmed: 29189481
Med J Malaysia. 2014 Feb;69(1):46-8
pubmed: 24814633
Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;19(6):479-81
pubmed: 11593466
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jan;69(1):179-83
pubmed: 17913429
Radiol Med. 2016 Mar;121(3):190-9
pubmed: 26519045
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3):616-22
pubmed: 22915402
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 May-Jun;37(3):382-6
pubmed: 23674009
BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):468-72
pubmed: 17332586
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Oct;7(10):754-73
pubmed: 20889105
BMC Urol. 2003 Mar 17;3:2
pubmed: 12675951
Insights Imaging. 2013 Jun;4(3):301-8
pubmed: 23456750