Risk Factors for Prolonged Hospital Stay after Endoscopy.
Endoscopy
Hospital stay
Midazolam
Recovery
Sedation
Journal
Clinical endoscopy
ISSN: 2234-2400
Titre abrégé: Clin Endosc
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101576886
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
05
11
2020
accepted:
30
12
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2021
medline:
17
3
2021
entrez:
16
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recovery room used after endoscopy has limited capacity, and an efficient flow of the endoscopy unit is desired. We investigated the duration of hospital stay after endoscopy and the risk factors for prolonged hospital stay among outpatients. We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy at the Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic. We collected data on age, sex, body weight, midazolam and pethidine dosage, respiratory depression during endoscopy, and duration of hospital stay after endoscopy (scope out to check out). Risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (>100 minutes) were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. We enrolled 3,898 patients, including 3,517 (90.2%) patients tested under sedation and 381 (9.8%) patients tested without sedation. Overall, 442 (11.3%) patients had prolonged stay (>100 min). The mean time difference between sedation group and non-sedation group was 44.2 minutes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 39.1 minutes for colonoscopy. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.025; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.014-1.036), female sex (OR, 1.657; 95% CI, 1.220-2.249), and midazolam dose (OR, 1.019; 95% CI, 1.013-1.026) were independently associated with prolonged hospital stay after esophagogastroduodenoscopy, with similar results for colonoscopy. Old age, female sex, and midazolam dose were independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after endoscopy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The recovery room used after endoscopy has limited capacity, and an efficient flow of the endoscopy unit is desired. We investigated the duration of hospital stay after endoscopy and the risk factors for prolonged hospital stay among outpatients.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy at the Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic. We collected data on age, sex, body weight, midazolam and pethidine dosage, respiratory depression during endoscopy, and duration of hospital stay after endoscopy (scope out to check out). Risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (>100 minutes) were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We enrolled 3,898 patients, including 3,517 (90.2%) patients tested under sedation and 381 (9.8%) patients tested without sedation. Overall, 442 (11.3%) patients had prolonged stay (>100 min). The mean time difference between sedation group and non-sedation group was 44.2 minutes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 39.1 minutes for colonoscopy. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.025; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.014-1.036), female sex (OR, 1.657; 95% CI, 1.220-2.249), and midazolam dose (OR, 1.019; 95% CI, 1.013-1.026) were independently associated with prolonged hospital stay after esophagogastroduodenoscopy, with similar results for colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Old age, female sex, and midazolam dose were independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after endoscopy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33721977
pii: ce.2020.292
doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.292
pmc: PMC8652156
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
851-856Références
Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(1):113-20
pubmed: 25251893
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Aug;7(8):E987-E993
pubmed: 31367679
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):398-399
pubmed: 31688220
Clin Endosc. 2014 Mar;47(2):135-40
pubmed: 24765595
Clin Endosc. 2016 Jan;49(1):47-55
pubmed: 26855924
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Aug;59(8):1717-25
pubmed: 24563235
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199246
pubmed: 29927978
Hepatology. 2005 May;41(5):1144-50
pubmed: 15841467
Clin Endosc. 2020 Sep;53(5):562-567
pubmed: 32615653
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):327-337
pubmed: 29306520
Clin Endosc. 2019 Sep;52(5):451-457
pubmed: 31591282
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 7;24(13):1419-1428
pubmed: 29632423
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E809-E814
pubmed: 32523979
Endoscopy. 2020 Jun;52(6):483-490
pubmed: 32303090
Clin Endosc. 2014 Mar;47(2):129-34
pubmed: 24765594
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2020 Jan;66(1):78-81
pubmed: 32001961
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 May;67(6):910-23
pubmed: 18440381
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E770-E774
pubmed: 32490162
Intest Res. 2017 Oct;15(4):456-466
pubmed: 29142513
Gut. 2020 Nov;69(11):1915-1924
pubmed: 32816921
Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(1):8-15
pubmed: 25369736
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E775-E782
pubmed: 32490163
Chonnam Med J. 2020 Sep;56(3):191-195
pubmed: 33014758
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct 16;12(10):401-403
pubmed: 33133376
Int J Med Educ. 2019 Jul 04;10:129-135
pubmed: 31272084
Clin Endosc. 2020 Mar;53(2):243-245
pubmed: 32252508
Anesth Analg. 1999 Nov;89(5):1161-6
pubmed: 10553827
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Jul;6(6):801-805
pubmed: 30023057
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2018 Nov;63(3):230-232
pubmed: 30487674
Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):195-202
pubmed: 32886846
Can J Anaesth. 2002 Nov;49(9):927-31
pubmed: 12419718
Gastroenterology. 2007 Aug;133(2):675-701
pubmed: 17681185
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019 May;2(2):86-90
pubmed: 31294370