Evaluation of direct and maternal responses in reproduction traits based on different selection strategies for postnatal piglet survival in a selection experiment.


Journal

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 22 04 2020
accepted: 05 02 2021
entrez: 16 3 2021
pubmed: 17 3 2021
medline: 20 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Postnatal piglet survival is important both in economic and animal welfare terms. It is influenced by the piglet's own direct genetic effects and by maternal genetic effects of the dam, associated with milk production and mothering abilities. These genetic effects might be correlated, affected by other non-genetic factors and unfavourably associated with other reproduction traits such as litter size, which makes the development of optimal breeding strategies a challenge. To identify the optimum selection strategy for piglet survival, a selection experiment was carried out to compare responses in survival and reproduction traits to selection on only direct, only maternal, or both genetic effects of postnatal survival. The data of the experiment were recorded from outdoor reared pigs, with first- and second-generation sires selected based on their estimated breeding values for maternal and direct effects of postnatal survival of indoor reared offspring, respectively, with the opportunity to identify potential genotype-by-environment interaction. A Bayesian multivariate threshold-linear model that was fitted to data on 22,483 piglets resulted in significant (Pr(h Selection successfully improved post- and perinatal survival and birth weight, which indicates that they are genetically determined and that genotype-by-environment interactions between outdoor (experimental data) and indoor (selection data) housed pigs were not important for these traits. A substantially increased overall (direct plus maternal) response was obtained using selection for maternal versus direct or both direct and maternal effects, suggesting that the maternal genetic effects are the main limiting factor for improving piglet survival on which selection pressure should be emphasized.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Postnatal piglet survival is important both in economic and animal welfare terms. It is influenced by the piglet's own direct genetic effects and by maternal genetic effects of the dam, associated with milk production and mothering abilities. These genetic effects might be correlated, affected by other non-genetic factors and unfavourably associated with other reproduction traits such as litter size, which makes the development of optimal breeding strategies a challenge. To identify the optimum selection strategy for piglet survival, a selection experiment was carried out to compare responses in survival and reproduction traits to selection on only direct, only maternal, or both genetic effects of postnatal survival. The data of the experiment were recorded from outdoor reared pigs, with first- and second-generation sires selected based on their estimated breeding values for maternal and direct effects of postnatal survival of indoor reared offspring, respectively, with the opportunity to identify potential genotype-by-environment interaction.
RESULTS RESULTS
A Bayesian multivariate threshold-linear model that was fitted to data on 22,483 piglets resulted in significant (Pr(h
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Selection successfully improved post- and perinatal survival and birth weight, which indicates that they are genetically determined and that genotype-by-environment interactions between outdoor (experimental data) and indoor (selection data) housed pigs were not important for these traits. A substantially increased overall (direct plus maternal) response was obtained using selection for maternal versus direct or both direct and maternal effects, suggesting that the maternal genetic effects are the main limiting factor for improving piglet survival on which selection pressure should be emphasized.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33722208
doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00612-7
pii: 10.1186/s12711-021-00612-7
pmc: PMC7958901
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

28

Références

J Anim Sci. 1993 Sep;71(9):2353-64
pubmed: 8407647
J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;93(11):5153-63
pubmed: 26641035
J Anim Sci. 2014 Dec;92(12):5345-57
pubmed: 25367527
J Anim Sci. 1993 Nov;71(11):2891-904
pubmed: 8270512
J Anim Sci. 2007 Jul;85(7):1615-24
pubmed: 17371794
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Apr 01;48:30
pubmed: 27038606
Animal. 2008 Feb;2(2):184-9
pubmed: 22445011
J Reprod Fertil. 1983 Nov;69(2):659-63
pubmed: 6631828
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Sep 18;50(1):46
pubmed: 30227828
J Anim Sci. 2010 Apr;88(4):1240-7
pubmed: 20081086
J Anim Breed Genet. 2020 May;137(3):263-280
pubmed: 31709657
Animal. 2019 Oct;13(10):2114-2124
pubmed: 30871651
J Anim Sci. 2003 Mar;81(3):604-10
pubmed: 12661639
J Perinatol. 2004 Jul;24(7):435-40
pubmed: 15116139
Animal. 2020 Apr;14(4):688-696
pubmed: 31657286
Anim Sci J. 2019 Jan;90(1):23-28
pubmed: 30370591
J Anim Sci. 2007 Jun;85(6):1385-92
pubmed: 17339413
Animal. 2007 Aug;1(7):1033-41
pubmed: 22444806
J Anim Sci. 2009 Jan;87(1):80-7
pubmed: 18791158
J Anim Sci. 1993 Dec;71(12):3251-60
pubmed: 8294276
Genet Res (Camb). 2010 Dec;92(5-6):381-95
pubmed: 21429270
J Anim Sci. 2004 Aug;82(8):2301-6
pubmed: 15318728
Animal. 2013 Aug;7(8):1231-8
pubmed: 23537426
Anim Sci J. 2018 May;89(5):760-769
pubmed: 29399930
Poult Sci. 2007 May;86(5):823-8
pubmed: 17435014
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 May 22;49(1):48
pubmed: 28532460
J Anim Sci. 1972 Dec;35(6):1288-93
pubmed: 4567216
J Anim Breed Genet. 2015 Aug;132(4):328-37
pubmed: 25424416
J Anim Sci. 2010 Apr;88(4):1276-85
pubmed: 19966158

Auteurs

Tuan Q Nguyen (TQ)

Department of Agriculture, Horticulture and Engineering Sciences, SRUC (Scotland's Rural College), Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. tuan.nguyen@sruc.ac.uk.
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Nong Lam University - Ho Chi Minh City, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City, 71308, Vietnam. tuan.nguyen@sruc.ac.uk.

Pieter W Knap (PW)

Genus-PIC, 24837, Schleswig, Germany.

Geoff Simm (G)

Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.

Sandra A Edwards (SA)

School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.

Rainer Roehe (R)

Department of Agriculture, Horticulture and Engineering Sciences, SRUC (Scotland's Rural College), Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. rainer.roehe@sruc.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH