Understanding how communities respond to COVID-19: experiences from the Orthodox Jewish communities of Antwerp city.
Adult
Aged
Belgium
/ epidemiology
COVID-19
/ prevention & control
Communicable Disease Control
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Community Participation
/ psychology
Community-Based Participatory Research
Female
Humans
Jews
/ psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Qualitative Research
Quarantine
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Trust
/ psychology
COVID-19
Community engagement
Orthodox Judaism
Participatory approach
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2021
15 03 2021
Historique:
received:
18
12
2020
accepted:
02
03
2021
entrez:
16
3
2021
pubmed:
17
3
2021
medline:
7
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The importance of community involvement in the response against disease outbreaks has been well established. However, we lack insights into local communities' experiences in coping with the current COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored both the impact of, and response to, COVID-19 within the Orthodox Jewish communities of Antwerp (Belgium) during the first lockdown period (March 2020 - May 2020). We conducted an explorative qualitative study using a participatory approach. First, we performed a community mapping to identify relevant stakeholders. Through the active involvement of a community advisory board and based on qualitative interviews with key-informants and community members, we elicited lived experiences, attitudes, and perceptions towards COVID-19. Interviews were conducted both face-to-face and using online web conferencing technology. Data were analyzed inductively according to the principles of thematic analysis. Government-issued outbreak control measures presented context-specific challenges to the Orthodox Jewish communities in Antwerp. They related mainly to the remote organization of religious life, and practicing physical distancing in socially and culturally strongly connected communities. Existing community resources were rapidly mobilized to adapt to the outbreak and to self-organize response initiatives within communities. The active involvement of community and religious leaders in risk communication proved to be of great importance to facilitate the coverage and uptake of pandemic control measures while protecting essential community values and traditions. Creating bottom-up and community-adapted communication strategies, including addressing language barriers and involving Rabbis in the dissemination of prevention messages, fostered a feeling of trust in government's response measures. However, unmet information and prevention needs were also identified, such as the need for inclusive communication by public authorities and the need to mitigate the negative effects of stigmatization. The experiences of Orthodox Jewish communities in Antwerp demonstrate a valuable example of a feasible community-centered approach to health emergencies. Increasing the engagement of communities in local decision-making and governance structures remains a key strategy to respond to unmet information and prevention needs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The importance of community involvement in the response against disease outbreaks has been well established. However, we lack insights into local communities' experiences in coping with the current COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored both the impact of, and response to, COVID-19 within the Orthodox Jewish communities of Antwerp (Belgium) during the first lockdown period (March 2020 - May 2020).
METHODS
We conducted an explorative qualitative study using a participatory approach. First, we performed a community mapping to identify relevant stakeholders. Through the active involvement of a community advisory board and based on qualitative interviews with key-informants and community members, we elicited lived experiences, attitudes, and perceptions towards COVID-19. Interviews were conducted both face-to-face and using online web conferencing technology. Data were analyzed inductively according to the principles of thematic analysis.
RESULTS
Government-issued outbreak control measures presented context-specific challenges to the Orthodox Jewish communities in Antwerp. They related mainly to the remote organization of religious life, and practicing physical distancing in socially and culturally strongly connected communities. Existing community resources were rapidly mobilized to adapt to the outbreak and to self-organize response initiatives within communities. The active involvement of community and religious leaders in risk communication proved to be of great importance to facilitate the coverage and uptake of pandemic control measures while protecting essential community values and traditions. Creating bottom-up and community-adapted communication strategies, including addressing language barriers and involving Rabbis in the dissemination of prevention messages, fostered a feeling of trust in government's response measures. However, unmet information and prevention needs were also identified, such as the need for inclusive communication by public authorities and the need to mitigate the negative effects of stigmatization.
CONCLUSION
The experiences of Orthodox Jewish communities in Antwerp demonstrate a valuable example of a feasible community-centered approach to health emergencies. Increasing the engagement of communities in local decision-making and governance structures remains a key strategy to respond to unmet information and prevention needs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33722263
doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01417-2
pii: 10.1186/s12939-021-01417-2
pmc: PMC7957442
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78Références
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):
pubmed: 32513864
Int J Equity Health. 2020 May 19;19(1):71
pubmed: 32429995
J Relig Health. 2020 Oct;59(5):2256-2262
pubmed: 32594340
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Jul 13;5:35
pubmed: 32685692
Glob Health Promot. 2016 Mar;23(1):75-8
pubmed: 26518038
Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1866-1868
pubmed: 33220850
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;10(2):358-63
pubmed: 15030713
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):626-646
pubmed: 28031301
BMJ. 2020 Apr 14;369:m1483
pubmed: 32291262
Int Health. 2009 Sep;1(1):31-6
pubmed: 24036293
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;57(2):153-65
pubmed: 21343210
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1269-79
pubmed: 17848436
Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2:S261-70
pubmed: 19797739
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2000 Jun;22(4):16-31
pubmed: 10852666
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):504-509
pubmed: 32436578
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Jul 14;42(4):382-386
pubmed: 33402799
J Relig Health. 2020 Oct;59(5):2288-2301
pubmed: 32705481
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):
pubmed: 33051285
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 May 6;5:88
pubmed: 32613083
Psychol Med. 2020 May 21;:1-13
pubmed: 32436485
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jun;8(6):547-548
pubmed: 32401711
J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):412-420
pubmed: 28840421
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):557
pubmed: 28806946
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:637349
pubmed: 33679564
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):470-473
pubmed: 32584103
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Apr 6;19(1):51
pubmed: 32252778
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29 Suppl 2:ii98-106
pubmed: 25274645
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2466-2467
pubmed: 32391864