Can wearable technology be used to approximate cardiopulmonary exercise testing metrics?

Anaerobic threshold Cardiopulmonary exercise testing Perioperative medicine VO2 Wearable technology

Journal

Perioperative medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 2047-0525
Titre abrégé: Perioper Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101609072

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 13 11 2020
accepted: 22 02 2021
entrez: 16 3 2021
pubmed: 17 3 2021
medline: 17 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Consumer wrist-worn wearable activity monitors are widely available, low cost and are able to provide a direct measurement of several markers of physical activity. Despite this, there is limited data on their use in perioperative risk prediction. We explored whether these wearables could accurately approximate metrics (anaerobic threshold, peak oxygen uptake and peak work) derived using formalised cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing high-risk surgery. Patients scheduled for major elective intra-abdominal surgery and undergoing CPET were included. Physical activity levels were estimated through direct measures (step count, floors climbed and total distance travelled) obtained through continuous wear of a wrist worn activity monitor (Garmin Vivosmart HR+) for 7 days prior to surgery and self-report through completion of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Correlations and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis explored the relationships between parameters provided by CPET and physical activity. Our choice of consumer wearable device was made to maximise feasibility outcomes for this study. The Garmin Vivosmart HR+ had the longest battery life and best waterproof characteristics of the available low-cost devices. Of 55 patients invited to participate, 49 (mean age 65.3 ± 13.6 years; 32 males) were enrolled; 37 provided complete wearable data for analyses and 36 patients provided full IPAQ data. Floors climbed, total steps and total travelled as measured by the wearable device all showed moderate correlation with CPET parameters of peak oxygen uptake (peak VO Data recorded by the wearable device was able to consistently approximate CPET results, both with and without the addition of patient reported activity measures via IPAQ scores. This highlights the potential utility of wearable devices in formal assessment of physical functioning and suggests they could play a larger role in pre-operative risk assessment. This study entitled "uSing wearable TEchnology to Predict perioperative high-riSk patient outcomes (STEPS)" gained favourable ethical opinion on 24 January 2017 from the Welsh Research Ethics Committee 3 reference number 17/WA/0006. It was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT03328039.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Consumer wrist-worn wearable activity monitors are widely available, low cost and are able to provide a direct measurement of several markers of physical activity. Despite this, there is limited data on their use in perioperative risk prediction. We explored whether these wearables could accurately approximate metrics (anaerobic threshold, peak oxygen uptake and peak work) derived using formalised cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing high-risk surgery.
METHODS METHODS
Patients scheduled for major elective intra-abdominal surgery and undergoing CPET were included. Physical activity levels were estimated through direct measures (step count, floors climbed and total distance travelled) obtained through continuous wear of a wrist worn activity monitor (Garmin Vivosmart HR+) for 7 days prior to surgery and self-report through completion of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Correlations and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis explored the relationships between parameters provided by CPET and physical activity.
DEVICE SELECTION UNASSIGNED
Our choice of consumer wearable device was made to maximise feasibility outcomes for this study. The Garmin Vivosmart HR+ had the longest battery life and best waterproof characteristics of the available low-cost devices.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 55 patients invited to participate, 49 (mean age 65.3 ± 13.6 years; 32 males) were enrolled; 37 provided complete wearable data for analyses and 36 patients provided full IPAQ data. Floors climbed, total steps and total travelled as measured by the wearable device all showed moderate correlation with CPET parameters of peak oxygen uptake (peak VO
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Data recorded by the wearable device was able to consistently approximate CPET results, both with and without the addition of patient reported activity measures via IPAQ scores. This highlights the potential utility of wearable devices in formal assessment of physical functioning and suggests they could play a larger role in pre-operative risk assessment.
ETHICS METHODS
This study entitled "uSing wearable TEchnology to Predict perioperative high-riSk patient outcomes (STEPS)" gained favourable ethical opinion on 24 January 2017 from the Welsh Research Ethics Committee 3 reference number 17/WA/0006. It was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT03328039.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33722305
doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00180-w
pii: 10.1186/s13741-021-00180-w
pmc: PMC7959880
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03328039']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

9

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_14108
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : N/A
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

J Pers Med. 2017 May 24;7(2):
pubmed: 28538708
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Oct 25;17(11):
pubmed: 29068357
Circulation. 1991 Mar;83(3):778-86
pubmed: 1999029
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;120(3):484-500
pubmed: 29452805
JAMA. 1971 Aug 23;217(8):1061-6
pubmed: 5109427
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Jun;37(6):563-566
pubmed: 30851983
Postgrad Med J. 2007 Nov;83(985):675-82
pubmed: 17989266

Auteurs

Laura Jones (L)

Adult Critical Care Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4RQ, UK.

Laura Tan (L)

Adult Critical Care Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4RQ, UK.

Suzanne Carey-Jones (S)

Department of Anaesthetics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Nathan Riddell (N)

Adult Critical Care Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4RQ, UK.

Richard Davies (R)

Department of Anaesthetics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Ashleigh Brownsdon (A)

Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Mark Kelson (M)

Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Rhys Williams-Thomas (R)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Monica Busse (M)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Michael M Davies (MM)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Matt P G Morgan (MPG)

Adult Critical Care Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4RQ, UK. morganMP@cardiff.ac.uk.
Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. morganMP@cardiff.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH