Efficacy and safety of obeticholic acid in liver disease-A systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology
ISSN: 2210-741X
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101553659

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 03 01 2021
revised: 17 02 2021
accepted: 03 03 2021
pubmed: 17 3 2021
medline: 8 2 2022
entrez: 16 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Currently, there is no pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a common liver disorder. In contrast, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease for which ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the drug of choice. However, 50% of PBC patients may not respond to UDCA. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is emerging as a vital pharmacotherapy for these chronic disorders. We aimed to analyse the safety and efficacy of OCA. We performed an extensive search of electronic databases from 01/01/2000 to 31/03/2020. We included randomized controlled trials of OCA in patients with NASH, PBC, and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We assessed the histological improvement in NASH, reduction in alkaline phosphatase (≤1.67 ULN) in PBC, and the adverse effects of OCA. Seven RCTs (n = 2834) were included. Of the total RCTs, there were three on both NASH and PBC and one on PSC. OCA improved NASH fibrosis [OR: 1.95 (1.47-2.59; p < 0.001)]. With the 10 mg OCA dose, the odds of improvement was 1.61 (1.03-2.51; p = 0.03), while with the 25 mg dose, it was 2.23 (1.55-3.18; p < 0.001). However, 25 mg OCA led to significant adverse events and discontinuation of the drug [2.8 (1.42-3.02); p < 0.001)] compared with 10 mg OCA [0.95 (0.6-1.5); p = 0.84] in NASH patients. In PBC patients, the response to 5 mg OCA was better than with the higher doses [5 mg: 7.66 (3.12-18.81; p < 0.001), 10 mg: 5.18 (2-13.41; p = 0.001), 25 mg: 2.36 (0.94-5.93; p = 0.06), 50 mg: 4.08 (1.05-15.78; p = 0.04)]. The risk of pruritus was lowest with 5 mg OCA. Lower doses of OCA are effective and safe in NASH and cholestatic liver disease. While 10 mg OCA is effective for NASH fibrosis regression, only 5 mg OCA is required for PBC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Currently, there is no pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a common liver disorder. In contrast, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease for which ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the drug of choice. However, 50% of PBC patients may not respond to UDCA. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is emerging as a vital pharmacotherapy for these chronic disorders. We aimed to analyse the safety and efficacy of OCA.
METHODS METHODS
We performed an extensive search of electronic databases from 01/01/2000 to 31/03/2020. We included randomized controlled trials of OCA in patients with NASH, PBC, and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We assessed the histological improvement in NASH, reduction in alkaline phosphatase (≤1.67 ULN) in PBC, and the adverse effects of OCA.
RESULTS RESULTS
Seven RCTs (n = 2834) were included. Of the total RCTs, there were three on both NASH and PBC and one on PSC. OCA improved NASH fibrosis [OR: 1.95 (1.47-2.59; p < 0.001)]. With the 10 mg OCA dose, the odds of improvement was 1.61 (1.03-2.51; p = 0.03), while with the 25 mg dose, it was 2.23 (1.55-3.18; p < 0.001). However, 25 mg OCA led to significant adverse events and discontinuation of the drug [2.8 (1.42-3.02); p < 0.001)] compared with 10 mg OCA [0.95 (0.6-1.5); p = 0.84] in NASH patients. In PBC patients, the response to 5 mg OCA was better than with the higher doses [5 mg: 7.66 (3.12-18.81; p < 0.001), 10 mg: 5.18 (2-13.41; p = 0.001), 25 mg: 2.36 (0.94-5.93; p = 0.06), 50 mg: 4.08 (1.05-15.78; p = 0.04)]. The risk of pruritus was lowest with 5 mg OCA.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Lower doses of OCA are effective and safe in NASH and cholestatic liver disease. While 10 mg OCA is effective for NASH fibrosis regression, only 5 mg OCA is required for PBC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33722778
pii: S2210-7401(21)00054-1
doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101675
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pharmaceutical Preparations 0
obeticholic acid 0462Z4S4OZ
Chenodeoxycholic Acid 0GEI24LG0J
Ursodeoxycholic Acid 724L30Y2QR

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101675

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Anand V Kulkarni (AV)

Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: anandvk90@gmail.com.

Harsh Vardhan Tevethia (HV)

Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Juan Pablo Arab (JP)

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Roberto Candia (R)

Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Madhumita Premkumar (M)

Department of Hepatology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Pramod Kumar (P)

Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Mithun Sharma (M)

Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

D Nageshwar Reddy (DN)

Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Nagaraja Rao Padaki (NR)

Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH