Bailout stentectomy of 47 self-expandable intracranial stents.


Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 06 01 2021
revised: 25 02 2021
accepted: 26 02 2021
pubmed: 17 3 2021
medline: 21 1 2022
entrez: 16 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Self-expanding stents are increasingly being deployed for stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms. Complications related to stent misbehavior may arise, however, including lack of expansion, device displacement, or parent vessel thrombosis. We present our experience of various stent removal techniques (stentectomy) with a focus on technical and clinical outcomes. Stentectomy was attempted either with a single device, including the Alligator, Microsnare, or Solitaire, or by combining a Microsnare with a second device. Dual techniques included in this report are the Snare-over-Stentretriever technique we developed using a Microsnare and a Solitaire, and the previously described Loop-and-Snare technique using a Microsnare and a microwire. The technical success and complication rate, as well as the clinical outcome using the mRS were analyzed. Forty-seven stentectomies were attempted in 36 patients treated for 37 aneurysms. Forty-two devices (89.3%) were successfully retrieved. Single-device stentectomy was successful in 34% of cases, compared with 74% with dual-device techniques. Of the 20 patients with a thrombosed parent or efferent vessel, 17 were successfully recanalized using stentectomy. All successful stentectomy patients made a clinically uneventful recovery, except one with a minor postoperative stroke (mRS 1 at discharge). Failed stentectomy was associated with major ischemic stroke in two patients and death in one patient. There were no stentectomy-related vessel perforations or dissections. While various single devices can be used to safely retrieve dysfunctional intracranial self-expandable stents, dual-device techniques are more than twice as effective, according to our experience.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Self-expanding stents are increasingly being deployed for stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms. Complications related to stent misbehavior may arise, however, including lack of expansion, device displacement, or parent vessel thrombosis. We present our experience of various stent removal techniques (stentectomy) with a focus on technical and clinical outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
Stentectomy was attempted either with a single device, including the Alligator, Microsnare, or Solitaire, or by combining a Microsnare with a second device. Dual techniques included in this report are the Snare-over-Stentretriever technique we developed using a Microsnare and a Solitaire, and the previously described Loop-and-Snare technique using a Microsnare and a microwire. The technical success and complication rate, as well as the clinical outcome using the mRS were analyzed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-seven stentectomies were attempted in 36 patients treated for 37 aneurysms. Forty-two devices (89.3%) were successfully retrieved. Single-device stentectomy was successful in 34% of cases, compared with 74% with dual-device techniques. Of the 20 patients with a thrombosed parent or efferent vessel, 17 were successfully recanalized using stentectomy. All successful stentectomy patients made a clinically uneventful recovery, except one with a minor postoperative stroke (mRS 1 at discharge). Failed stentectomy was associated with major ischemic stroke in two patients and death in one patient. There were no stentectomy-related vessel perforations or dissections.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
While various single devices can be used to safely retrieve dysfunctional intracranial self-expandable stents, dual-device techniques are more than twice as effective, according to our experience.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33722969
pii: neurintsurg-2021-017279
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017279
pmc: PMC8785071
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

160-163

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: René Chapot received consulting fee or speaker honoraria from Balt, Microvention, Rapid Medical, Siemens, and Stryker. Pascal Mosimann received public funding related to intracranial aneurysm and vasospasm therapy from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Innosuisse agency. Reza Rikhtegar received a travel grant from Boehringer Ingelheim and Microvention.

Références

World J Radiol. 2015 Jun 28;7(6):139-42
pubmed: 26120384
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):121-5
pubmed: 25082819
Stroke. 2013 Oct;44(10):2802-7
pubmed: 23908066
Eur J Radiol. 2004 Mar;49(3):281-5
pubmed: 14962660
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;135:73-8
pubmed: 26038280
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178197
pubmed: 28542580
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993 Jul-Aug;14(4):804-8
pubmed: 8352148
Neurointervention. 2012 Feb;7(1):50-3
pubmed: 22454786
Neuroradiology. 2018 Nov;60(11):1223-1230
pubmed: 30187084
Neurosurgery. 2005 Jul;57(1 Suppl):E210; discussion E210
pubmed: 15987594
Neuroradiology. 2006 Jul;48(7):471-8
pubmed: 16758153
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):1996-9
pubmed: 23764724
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 May;10(5):e6
pubmed: 27540091
J Neuroimaging. 2008 Jan;18(1):81-4
pubmed: 18190501
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Oct;24(9):1819-22
pubmed: 14561609
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jan;9(1):e4
pubmed: 27029394
Clin Neuroradiol. 2010 Dec;20(4):251-4
pubmed: 20967402
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1995 Apr;35(4):247-50
pubmed: 7596469
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):327-9
pubmed: 16484403
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Aug;15(1):85-95
pubmed: 20169473
Case Rep Med. 2012;2012:242101
pubmed: 22666264
Interv Neurol. 2020 Feb;8(1):38-54
pubmed: 32231694
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar;21(3):503-6
pubmed: 24332812
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Oct 15;58(10):435-441
pubmed: 30158353
J Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;123(4):841-7
pubmed: 26230470
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;85:349-52
pubmed: 26362087
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):52-7
pubmed: 25428449

Auteurs

René Chapot (R)

Department of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany Rchapot@icloud.com.

Christian Paul Stracke (CP)

Department of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany.

Marta Wallocha (M)

Department of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany.

Reza Rikhtegar (R)

Department of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany.

Elif Yamac (E)

Department of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany.

Pascal John Mosimann (PJ)

Department of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH