Male-to-female gender affirmation surgery: breast reconstruction with Ergonomix round prostheses.
Journal
International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
19
09
2020
accepted:
26
02
2021
revised:
11
02
2021
pubmed:
17
3
2021
medline:
17
11
2021
entrez:
16
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
People with gender dysphoria are becoming more prevalent and more universally accepted. Social, hormonal, and surgical gender transition are able to substantially improve their quality of life. Various gender affirmation surgery (GAS) options are available to address gender dysphoria in the male-to-female (MtF) population, including facial and chest feminization, body contouring, and genital surgery. While hormone replacement therapy may result in some degree of breast development, it is often insufficient to effectively result in an adequate female-like breast contour. The creation of a female chest is generally the first surgical step in the transition. The primary aim of this manuscript is to describe the surgical technique with ergonomix round prostheses used at our high-volume GAS center and to point out how anatomical differences between trans-female and cis-female patients impact surgery. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the demographic data and postoperative outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33723376
doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00425-8
pii: 10.1038/s41443-021-00425-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
720-725Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Murad MH, Elamin MB, Garcia MZ, Mullan RJ, Mura A, Erwin PJ, et al. Hormonal therapy and sex reassignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life and psychosocial outcomes. Clin Endocrinol. 2010;72:214–31.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03625.x
World Professional Association for Transgender Health. Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People. Version 7. East Dundee, Ill: World Professional Association for Transgender Health; 2012.
Miller TJ, Wilson SC, Massie JP, Morrison SD, Satterwhite T. Breast augmentation in male-to-female transgender patients: technical considerations and outcomes. JPRAS Open. 2019;21:63–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2019.03.003
de Boer M, van der Sluis WB, de Boer JP, Overbeek LH, van Leeuwen FE, Rakhorst HA, et al. Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma in a Transgender Woman. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:83–7.
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx098
Ettner RMS, Monstrey S, Coleman E. Principles of Transgender Medicine and Surgery. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis LTD.; 2016. p. 105–33.
Iwamoto SJ, Defreyne J, Rothman MS, Van Schuylenbergh J, Van de Bruaene L, Motmans J, et al. Health considerations for transgender women and remaining unknowns: a narrative review. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2019;10:1–27.
doi: 10.1177/2042018819871166
Berli JU, Knudson G, Fraser L, Tangpricha V, Ettner R, Ettner FM, et al. What Surgeons Need to Know About Gender Confirmation Surgery When Providing Care for Transgender Individuals: a Review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:394–400.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5549
Safa B, Lin WC, Salim AM, Deschamps-Braly JC, Poh MM. Current Concepts in Feminizing Gender Surgery. Plast Reconstructive Surg. 2019;143:1081–91.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005595
Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 min: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:2005–16.
pubmed: 16327616
Morrison SD, Wilson SC, Mosser SW. Breast and Body Contouring for Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45:333–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.03.015
Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Part IV - aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:372–82.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aeeb21
Weigert R, Frison E, Sessiecq Q, Al Mutairi K, Casoli V. Patient satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being after breast augmentation in male-to-female transsexuals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1421–9.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000434415.70711.49
Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, Klassen A, Cano SJ, Browne J, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015. JPRAS. 2016;69:149–62.
pubmed: 26740288
Clemens MW, Miranda RN, Butler CE. Breast Implant Informed Consent Should Include the Risk of Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1117–22.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000481103.45976.b1
Al-Ajam Y, Marsh DJ, Mohan AT, Hamilton S. Assessing the augmented breast: a blinded study comparing round and anatomical form-stable implants. Aesth Surg J. 2015;35:273–8.
doi: 10.1093/asj/sju053
Heden P, Montemurro P, Adams WP Jr, Germann G, Scheflan M, Maxwell GP. Anatomical and Round Breast Implants: How to Select and Indications for Use. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:263–72.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001474
Sforza M, Hammond DC, Botti G, Heden P, Quiros MC, Munhoz AM, et al. Expert consensus on the use of a new bioengineered, cell friendly, smooth surface breast implant. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39:95–102.
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz054