Differences between cancer patients and others who use medicinal Cannabis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
03
12
2020
accepted:
22
02
2021
entrez:
16
3
2021
pubmed:
17
3
2021
medline:
15
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cancer patients have been at the forefront of policy discussions leading to legalization of medical Cannabis (marijuana). Unfortunately, Cannabis use among those with cancer is poorly understood. A diverse group of patients seeking certification for medical Cannabis in the state of Michigan were surveyed at the time of their presentation to medical dispensaries. The survey assessed demographics, employment/disability, pain, physical functioning, mental health, mode of Cannabis use, and frequency/amount of Cannabis use. Chi-square and t-tests were performed to compare those who did and did not endorse cancer diagnosis. Analysis of data from 1485 adults pursuing medical Cannabis certification, including 72 (4.8%) reporting a cancer diagnosis, indicated that those with cancer were older [mean age 53.4 years (SD = 10.5) vs. 44.7 years (SD = 13.0); p<0.001] than those without cancer. They also differed regarding employment status (p<0.001; working: 20.8% vs. 46.2%; disabled: 44.4% vs. 26.5% for those with vs. those without cancer, respectively). Those with cancer used less Cannabis (p = 0.033 for quantity used) and used Cannabis less often (p = 0.032 for frequency of use); they less frequently endorsed smoking Cannabis (80% vs 91%; p = 0.015). There was a non-significant trend to increased edible use in those with cancer (57% vs. 44%; p = 0.052). Patients with cancer who are seeking medical Cannabis are different from those seeking medical Cannabis without cancer, and they report using Cannabis differently. Further research to characterize the patterns and consequences of Cannabis use in cancer patients is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cancer patients have been at the forefront of policy discussions leading to legalization of medical Cannabis (marijuana). Unfortunately, Cannabis use among those with cancer is poorly understood.
METHODS
A diverse group of patients seeking certification for medical Cannabis in the state of Michigan were surveyed at the time of their presentation to medical dispensaries. The survey assessed demographics, employment/disability, pain, physical functioning, mental health, mode of Cannabis use, and frequency/amount of Cannabis use. Chi-square and t-tests were performed to compare those who did and did not endorse cancer diagnosis.
RESULTS
Analysis of data from 1485 adults pursuing medical Cannabis certification, including 72 (4.8%) reporting a cancer diagnosis, indicated that those with cancer were older [mean age 53.4 years (SD = 10.5) vs. 44.7 years (SD = 13.0); p<0.001] than those without cancer. They also differed regarding employment status (p<0.001; working: 20.8% vs. 46.2%; disabled: 44.4% vs. 26.5% for those with vs. those without cancer, respectively). Those with cancer used less Cannabis (p = 0.033 for quantity used) and used Cannabis less often (p = 0.032 for frequency of use); they less frequently endorsed smoking Cannabis (80% vs 91%; p = 0.015). There was a non-significant trend to increased edible use in those with cancer (57% vs. 44%; p = 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with cancer who are seeking medical Cannabis are different from those seeking medical Cannabis without cancer, and they report using Cannabis differently. Further research to characterize the patterns and consequences of Cannabis use in cancer patients is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33725004
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248227
pii: PONE-D-20-38087
pmc: PMC7963092
doi:
Substances chimiques
Medical Marijuana
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0248227Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: RJ has stock options as compensation for her advisory board role in Equity Quotient, a company that evaluates culture in health care companies; she has received personal fees from Amgen and Vizient. She has received grants for unrelated work from the National Institutes of Health, the Doris Duke Foundation, the Greenwall Foundation, the Komen Foundation, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium. She has a contract to conduct an investigator-initiated study with Genentech. She has served as an expert witness for Sherinian and Hasso and Dressman Benzinger LaVelle. She is an uncompensated founding member of TIME’S UP Healthcare and a member of the Board of Directors of ASCO. MI owns shares of Arborsense, a company developing graphene-based sensors for alcohol and drugs. MMC and MJ have nothing to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):654-9
pubmed: 23683791
Cureus. 2019 Jan 19;11(1):e3918
pubmed: 30931189
Curr Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(3):219-225
pubmed: 29962840
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;26(1):21-6
pubmed: 21157847
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e341-e350
pubmed: 29976328
Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158
pubmed: 11690728
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;43(9):636-639
pubmed: 32889833
Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4488-4497
pubmed: 28944449
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 1;144(11):1017-1022
pubmed: 30073295
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:177-182
pubmed: 30384326
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;29(5):389-402
pubmed: 28753076
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Dec 10;:1-5
pubmed: 33216657
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
J Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;22(10):1196-1201
pubmed: 30909786
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;127(1):67-73
pubmed: 32986266