Patient-partner engagement at the Centre de recherche du CHUS in the Province of Québec, Canada: from an intuitive methodology to outreach after three years of implementation.
Contribution
Governance
Partnership
Patient and public involvement
Patient engagement
Patients networking
Research
Journal
Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Mar 2021
16 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
29
08
2020
accepted:
03
03
2021
entrez:
17
3
2021
pubmed:
18
3
2021
medline:
18
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medical societies and funding agencies strongly recommend that patients be included as partners in research publications and grant applications. Although this "top-down" approach is certainly efficient at forcing this new and desirable type of collaboration, our past experience demonstrated that it often results in an ambiguous relationship as not yet well integrated into the cultures of either patients' or the researchers'. The question our group raised from this observation was: "How to generate a cultural shift toward a fruitful and long-lasting collaboration between patients and researchers? A "bottom-up" approach was key to our stakeholders. The overall objective was to build a trusting and bidirectional-ecosystem between patients and researchers. The specific objectives were to document: 1) the steps that led to the development of the first patient-partner strategic committee within a research center in the Province of Québec; 2) the committee's achievements after 3 years. Eighteen volunteer members, 12 patient-partners and 6 clinician/institutional representatives, were invited to represent the six research themes of the Centre de recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS) (Quebec, Canada). Information on the services offered by Committee was disseminated internally and to external partners. Committee members satisfaction was evaluated. From May 2017 to April 2020, members attended 29 scheduled and 6 ad hoc meetings and contributed to activities requiring over 1000 h of volunteer time in 2018-2019 and 1907 h in the 2019-2020 period. The Committee's implication spanned governance, expertise, and knowledge transfer in research. Participation in these activities increased annually at local, provincial, national and international levels. The Patient-Partner Committee collaborated with various local (n = 7), provincial (n = 6) and national (n = 4) partners. Member satisfaction with the Committee's mandate and format was 100%. The CRCHUS co-constructed a Patient-Partner Strategic Committee which resulted in meaningful bilateral, trusting and fruitful collaborations between patients, researchers and partners. The "bottom-up" approach - envisioned and implemented by the Committee, where the expertise and the needs of patients complemented those of researchers, foundations, networks and decision-makers - is key to the success of a cultural shift. The CRCHUS Committee created a hub to develop the relevant intrinsic potential aimed at changing the socio-cultural environment of science.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Medical societies and funding agencies strongly recommend that patients be included as partners in research publications and grant applications. Although this "top-down" approach is certainly efficient at forcing this new and desirable type of collaboration, our past experience demonstrated that it often results in an ambiguous relationship as not yet well integrated into the cultures of either patients' or the researchers'. The question our group raised from this observation was: "How to generate a cultural shift toward a fruitful and long-lasting collaboration between patients and researchers? A "bottom-up" approach was key to our stakeholders. The overall objective was to build a trusting and bidirectional-ecosystem between patients and researchers. The specific objectives were to document: 1) the steps that led to the development of the first patient-partner strategic committee within a research center in the Province of Québec; 2) the committee's achievements after 3 years.
METHODS
METHODS
Eighteen volunteer members, 12 patient-partners and 6 clinician/institutional representatives, were invited to represent the six research themes of the Centre de recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS) (Quebec, Canada). Information on the services offered by Committee was disseminated internally and to external partners. Committee members satisfaction was evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From May 2017 to April 2020, members attended 29 scheduled and 6 ad hoc meetings and contributed to activities requiring over 1000 h of volunteer time in 2018-2019 and 1907 h in the 2019-2020 period. The Committee's implication spanned governance, expertise, and knowledge transfer in research. Participation in these activities increased annually at local, provincial, national and international levels. The Patient-Partner Committee collaborated with various local (n = 7), provincial (n = 6) and national (n = 4) partners. Member satisfaction with the Committee's mandate and format was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The CRCHUS co-constructed a Patient-Partner Strategic Committee which resulted in meaningful bilateral, trusting and fruitful collaborations between patients, researchers and partners. The "bottom-up" approach - envisioned and implemented by the Committee, where the expertise and the needs of patients complemented those of researchers, foundations, networks and decision-makers - is key to the success of a cultural shift. The CRCHUS Committee created a hub to develop the relevant intrinsic potential aimed at changing the socio-cultural environment of science.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33726817
doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00258-1
pii: 10.1186/s40900-021-00258-1
pmc: PMC7962081
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
15Subventions
Organisme : Centre de recherche du CHUS
ID : N/A
Organisme : Université de Sherbrooke - Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences - Patient-Partner Initiative
ID : N/A
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89
pubmed: 24568690
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):558-562
pubmed: 29327211
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 11;21(1):34
pubmed: 32393230
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5
pubmed: 29415734
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Nov 26;7:2054358120970093
pubmed: 33294204
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jul;43(7):1052-1054
pubmed: 27624068
Sante Publique. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1 Suppl):S41-50
pubmed: 26168616
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):903-4
pubmed: 18436920
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Apr 9;4:13
pubmed: 29657835
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Oct 21;5:30
pubmed: 31646001
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 May;50(5):219-221
pubmed: 32354313
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):709-720
pubmed: 31379094
BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1315-8
pubmed: 7773050
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801
pubmed: 31012259
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31
pubmed: 23381514
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):519-528
pubmed: 27338242
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jul;43(7):1062-1064
pubmed: 28497273
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):282-93
pubmed: 18816324
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):774-8
pubmed: 10488012
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13
pubmed: 29062538
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Aug;50(8):413-414
pubmed: 32736501
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):763-765
pubmed: 28497427
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):766-768
pubmed: 28497428
BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):463-6
pubmed: 9492683
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):5-18
pubmed: 31489988
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):898-905
pubmed: 33457517
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98
pubmed: 30045735
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316
pubmed: 30761699
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e017701
pubmed: 28871027
J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr;42(4):216-9
pubmed: 25825527
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):311-46
pubmed: 22709390
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jan 14;2:1
pubmed: 29062502
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Sep;19(9):21-31
pubmed: 31419191