National movement patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand: the unexplored role of neighbourhood deprivation.
deprivation
neighborhood/place
public health
public health policy
spatial analysis
Journal
Journal of epidemiology and community health
ISSN: 1470-2738
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol Community Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909766
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
23
11
2020
revised:
24
01
2021
accepted:
31
01
2021
pubmed:
18
3
2021
medline:
14
8
2021
entrez:
17
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has asked unprecedented questions of governments around the world. Policy responses have disrupted usual patterns of movement in society, locally and globally, with resultant impacts on national economies and human well-being. These interventions have primarily centred on enforcing lockdowns and introducing social distancing recommendations, leading to questions of trust and competency around the role of institutions and the administrative apparatus of state. This study demonstrates the unequal societal impacts in population movement during a national 'lockdown'. We use nationwide mobile phone movement data to quantify the effect of an enforced lockdown on population mobility by neighbourhood deprivation using an ecological study design. We then derive a mobility index using anonymised aggregated population counts for each neighbourhood (2253 Census Statistical Areas; mean population n=2086) of national hourly mobile phone location data (7.45 million records, 1 March 2020-20 July 2020) for New Zealand (NZ). Curtailing movement has highlighted and exacerbated underlying social and spatial inequalities. Our analysis reveals the unequal movements during 'lockdown' by neighbourhood socioeconomic status in NZ. In understanding inequalities in neighbourhood movements, we are contributing critical new evidence to the policy debate about the impact(s) and efficacy of national, regional or local lockdowns which have sparked such controversy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has asked unprecedented questions of governments around the world. Policy responses have disrupted usual patterns of movement in society, locally and globally, with resultant impacts on national economies and human well-being. These interventions have primarily centred on enforcing lockdowns and introducing social distancing recommendations, leading to questions of trust and competency around the role of institutions and the administrative apparatus of state. This study demonstrates the unequal societal impacts in population movement during a national 'lockdown'.
METHODS
We use nationwide mobile phone movement data to quantify the effect of an enforced lockdown on population mobility by neighbourhood deprivation using an ecological study design. We then derive a mobility index using anonymised aggregated population counts for each neighbourhood (2253 Census Statistical Areas; mean population n=2086) of national hourly mobile phone location data (7.45 million records, 1 March 2020-20 July 2020) for New Zealand (NZ).
RESULTS
Curtailing movement has highlighted and exacerbated underlying social and spatial inequalities. Our analysis reveals the unequal movements during 'lockdown' by neighbourhood socioeconomic status in NZ.
CONCLUSION
In understanding inequalities in neighbourhood movements, we are contributing critical new evidence to the policy debate about the impact(s) and efficacy of national, regional or local lockdowns which have sparked such controversy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33727245
pii: jech-2020-216108
doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-216108
pmc: PMC8372376
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
903-905Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Lancet. 2020 Jun 20;395(10241):1888-1890
pubmed: 32479828
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):201-203
pubmed: 32374952
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1243-1244
pubmed: 32305087
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1613-1614
pubmed: 31690438
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968
pubmed: 32535550
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 05;6(23):eabc0764
pubmed: 32548274
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov 3;:
pubmed: 33144334
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Sep;74(9):681-682
pubmed: 32669357
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693
pubmed: 32094110