Community pharmacists' use, perception and knowledge on dietary supplements: a cross sectional study.
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitudes
Croatia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dietary Supplements
Evidence-Based Pharmacy Practice
Health Knowledge
Pharmacies
Pharmacists
Practice
Journal
Pharmacy practice
ISSN: 1885-642X
Titre abrégé: Pharm Pract (Granada)
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101530029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
16
12
2020
accepted:
21
02
2021
entrez:
17
3
2021
pubmed:
18
3
2021
medline:
18
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pharmacists are commonly tasked with recommending the appropriate dietary supplement and advising the patients of their correct and safe use. Previous research, conducted on pharmacy students, showed that they did not always use the evidence based sources of information, with personal use identified as a significant predictor influencing the decision to recommend a supplement. To compare use, perceptions and knowledge of dietary supplements of pharmacists with different years of work experience and to explore factors that could influence their recommendation of supplements. A questionnaire based cross-sectional study was conducted on Croatian community pharmacists in September 2017. The questionnaire explored pharmacists' demographic characteristics, use, perceptions and knowledge of dietary supplements. Pharmacists (N=102) were divided in two groups based on their work experience: P0 (<10 years) and P1 (≥10 years). All included pharmacists had high knowledge scores without differences between groups (P0=10, IQR 9-12 vs P1=11, IQR 9-12, expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), p=0.275). Less experienced pharmacists perceived there was less research conducted on the dietary supplements compared to their more experienced counterparts (P0=1, IQR 1-2 vs P1=2, IQR 2-3, expressed as median and interquartile range, p<0.001). Groups differed in sources used when choosing the appropriate supplement with P0 using higher quality sources such as systematic reviews in comparison to P1 (32.1% vs 8.7%, p=0.004). Pharmacists' decision to recommend a dietary supplement was influenced by their personal use (odds ratio 0.216, 95%CI 0.068:0.689, p=0.01) and work experience (odds ratio 0.154, 95%CI 0.045:0.530, p=0.003). Pharmacists did not use the high quality sources when recommending dietary supplements and their decision to recommend the supplement was not based on objective evaluation of evidence. Further education about the practice of evidence-based pharmacy is necessary, with special emphasis on senior pharmacists who might have missed that aspect during their formal education.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pharmacists are commonly tasked with recommending the appropriate dietary supplement and advising the patients of their correct and safe use. Previous research, conducted on pharmacy students, showed that they did not always use the evidence based sources of information, with personal use identified as a significant predictor influencing the decision to recommend a supplement.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To compare use, perceptions and knowledge of dietary supplements of pharmacists with different years of work experience and to explore factors that could influence their recommendation of supplements.
METHODS
METHODS
A questionnaire based cross-sectional study was conducted on Croatian community pharmacists in September 2017. The questionnaire explored pharmacists' demographic characteristics, use, perceptions and knowledge of dietary supplements. Pharmacists (N=102) were divided in two groups based on their work experience: P0 (<10 years) and P1 (≥10 years).
RESULTS
RESULTS
All included pharmacists had high knowledge scores without differences between groups (P0=10, IQR 9-12 vs P1=11, IQR 9-12, expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), p=0.275). Less experienced pharmacists perceived there was less research conducted on the dietary supplements compared to their more experienced counterparts (P0=1, IQR 1-2 vs P1=2, IQR 2-3, expressed as median and interquartile range, p<0.001). Groups differed in sources used when choosing the appropriate supplement with P0 using higher quality sources such as systematic reviews in comparison to P1 (32.1% vs 8.7%, p=0.004). Pharmacists' decision to recommend a dietary supplement was influenced by their personal use (odds ratio 0.216, 95%CI 0.068:0.689, p=0.01) and work experience (odds ratio 0.154, 95%CI 0.045:0.530, p=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Pharmacists did not use the high quality sources when recommending dietary supplements and their decision to recommend the supplement was not based on objective evaluation of evidence. Further education about the practice of evidence-based pharmacy is necessary, with special emphasis on senior pharmacists who might have missed that aspect during their formal education.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33727993
doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2251
pii: pharmpract-19-2251
pmc: PMC7939115
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2251Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice and the Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Références
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Mar 15;18(1):92
pubmed: 29544493
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jun 18;76(13):980-990
pubmed: 31361883
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):712-721
pubmed: 28608329
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1660
pubmed: 32256893
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Jun;81(5):92
pubmed: 28720920
J Interprof Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;33(5):456-463
pubmed: 30403903
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):363
pubmed: 33228697
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1040-6
pubmed: 25494961
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2010 Apr;8(2):109-15
pubmed: 25132878
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jul-Sep;18(3):2078
pubmed: 33029263
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Aug;42(4):1109-1117
pubmed: 32686048
Complement Ther Med. 2018 Dec;41:35-40
pubmed: 30477862
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Apr;39(2):450-458
pubmed: 28108846
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;25(4):585-590
pubmed: 30028072
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Oct 10;12:183
pubmed: 23051066
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Apr-Jun;18(2):1751
pubmed: 32377276
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Aug 3;18(1):55
pubmed: 32746844