Georg Schmorl Prize of the German Spine Society (DWG) 2020: new biomechanical in vitro test method to determine subsidence risk of vertebral body replacements.
In vitro
Physiological activities
Sintering
Test method
Thoracolumbar spine
Vertebral body replacements
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
21
12
2020
accepted:
02
02
2021
revised:
15
01
2021
pubmed:
18
3
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
17
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prevention of implant subsidence in osteoporotic (thoraco)lumbar spines is still a major challenge in spinal surgery. In this study, a new biomechanical in vitro test method was developed to simulate patient activities in order to determine the subsidence risk of vertebral body replacements during physiologic loading conditions. The study included 12 (thoraco)lumbar (T11-L1, L2-L4) human specimens. After dorsal stabilisation and corpectomy, vertebral body replacements (VBR) with (a) round centrally located and (b) lateral end pieces with apophyseal support were implanted, equally distributed regarding segment, sex, mean BMD ((a) 64.2 mgCaHA/cm With this new test method, simulating everyday activities provoked clinically relevant subsidence schemes. Generally, severe everyday activities caused deeper subsidence which resulted in increased ROM. Subsidence of lateral end pieces was remarkably less pronounced which was accompanied by a smaller ROM in flexion-extension and higher motion possibilities in axial rotation (p = 0.05). In this study, a new biomechanical test method was developed that simulates physiologic activities to examine implant subsidence. It appears that the highest risk of subsidence occurs most when lifting heavy weights, and into the ventral part of the caudal vertebra. The results indicate that lateral end pieces may better prevent from implant subsidence because of the additional cortical support. Generally, patients that are treated with a VBR should avoid activities that create high loading on the spine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33730216
doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06764-w
pii: 10.1007/s00586-021-06764-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1117-1124Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : WI 1352/17-2
Références
Forstein DA, Bernardini C, Cole RE, Harris ST, Singer A (2013) Before the breaking point: reducing the risk of osteoporotic fracture. J Am Osteopath Assoc 113(2 Suppl 1):S5-24
pubmed: 23425935
Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201
doi: 10.1007/BF02221591
Geiger F, Kafchitsas K, Rauschmann M (2011) Anterior vertebroplasty of adjacent levels after vertebral body replacement. Eur Spine J 20(8):1385–1392
doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1766-x
Spiegl U, Jarvers JS, Heyde CE, Josten C (2017) Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: indications and techniques of a 360 degrees—stabilization. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43(1):27–33
doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0751-9
Burval DJ, McLain RF, Milks R, Inceoglu S (2007) Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(10):1077–1083
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000261566.38422.40
Tan JS, Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Cripton PA, Oxland TR (2007) Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(3):334–341
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000253645.24141.21
Disch AC, Knop C, Schaser KD, Blauth M, Schmoelz W (2008) Angular stable anterior plating following thoracolumbar corpectomy reveals superior segmental stability compared to conventional polyaxial plate fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(13):1429–1437
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175c342
Oberkircher L, Krüger A, Hörth D, Hack J, Ruchholtz S, Fleege C, Rauschmann M, Arabmotlagh M (2018) Anterior cement augmentation of adjacent levels after vertebral body replacement leads to superior stability of the corpectomy cage under cyclic loading-a biomechanical investigation. Spine J 18(3):525–531
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.068
Kettler A, Schmölz W, Shezifi Y, Ohana N, Ben-Arye A, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2006) Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: Restoration and maintenance of height and stability. Clin Biomech 21(7):676–682
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.02.005
Wilke HJ, Mehnert U, Claes LE, Bierschneider MM, Jaksche H, Boszczyk BM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cyclic loading. Spine 31(25):2934–2941
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000248423.28511.44
Wilke HJ, Claes L, Schmitt H, Wolf S (1994) A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation. Eur Spine J 3(2):91–97
doi: 10.1007/BF02221446
Wilke HJ, Kienle A, Maile S, Rasche V, Berger-Roscher N (2016) A new dynamic six degrees of freedom disc-loading simulator allows to provoke disc damage and herniation. Eur Spine J 25(5):1363–1372
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4416-5
Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24(8):755–762
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199904150-00005
Brinckmann P, Grootenboer H (1991) Change of disc height, radial disc bulge, and intradiscal pressure from discectomy. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(6):641–646
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00008
Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Dietl R, Krammer M, Lumenta C, Claes L (2000) Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading. J Neurosurg 92(1 Suppl):87–92
pubmed: 10616063
Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Oeser M, Blauth M (2001) Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement. Eur Spine J 10(1):30–37
doi: 10.1007/s005860000211
Panjabi MM, White AA 3rd (1980) Basic biomechanics of the spine. Neurosurgery 7(1):76–93
doi: 10.1227/00006123-198007000-00014
Wilke HJ, Herkommer A, Werner K, Liebsch C (2017) In vitro analysis of the segmental flexibility of the thoracic spine. PLoS ONE 12(5):e0177823
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177823
Wilke HJ, Wolf S, Claes LE, Arand M, Wiesend A (1995) Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups A biomechanical in vitro study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(2):192–198
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199501150-00011
Arts MP, Peul WC (2008) Vertebral body replacement systems with expandable cages in the treatment of various spinal pathologies: a prospectively followed case series of 60 patients. Neurosurgery 63(3):537–544, discussion 544–535
Lange U, Edeling S, Knop C, Bastian L, Oeser M, Krettek C, Blauth M (2007) Anterior vertebral body replacement with a titanium implant of adjustable height: a prospective clinical study. Eur Spine J 16(2):161–172
doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0015-6
Lange U, Knop C, Bastian L, Blauth M (2003) Prospective multicenter study with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(5):203–208
doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0486-z
Mohammad-Shahi MH, Nikolaou VS, Giannitsios D, Ouellet J, Jarzem PF (2013) The effect of angular mismatch between vertebral endplate and vertebral body replacement endplate on implant subsidence. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(5):268–273
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182425eab
Uchida K, Kobayashi S, Nakajima H, Kokubo Y, Yayama T, Sato R, Timbihurira G, Baba H (2006) Anterior expandable strut cage replacement for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse. J Neurosurg Spine 4(6):454–462
doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.6.454
Ponnusamy KE, Iyer S, Gupta G, Khanna AJ (2011) Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations. Spine J 11(1):54–63
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.024
Wu ZX, Gong FT, Liu L, Ma ZS, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Yang M, Lei W, Sang HX (2012) A comparative study on screw loosening in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion between expandable and conventional pedicle screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(4):471–476
doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1439-6