Efficacy of single versus multiple exposure by electromagnetic modalities on gram-negative and positive bacterial strains in an in-vitro model.
Electromagnetic spectrum
Gram negative bacteria
Gram positive bacteria
Low level laser therapy
Magnetic therapy
Microwave diathermy
Photo-inhibitory
Journal
Saudi journal of biological sciences
ISSN: 1319-562X
Titre abrégé: Saudi J Biol Sci
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 101543796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
20
10
2020
revised:
29
11
2020
accepted:
03
12
2020
entrez:
18
3
2021
pubmed:
19
3
2021
medline:
19
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The primary purpose of the recent experiment was to scrutinize the dissimilarity between single and multiple exposures by electrotherapeutic modalities to determine the development of Gram-positive and Gram negative bacteria spectrum. Bacterial strains employed in this study were Gram-negative bacteria such as Repeated Measures of analysis of variances (RANOVA) for within-subject effects was used to detect a global significant change within the means at dissimilar time points. The experiments of within-subjects revealed a significant difference within groups, df of (3, 40), F value of 39.38 and a p value less than 0.001, representing a significant variation between the three groups between pre and post exposures. There was a significant variation between single exposure and multiple exposures in the experimental sample's pre-post between the four groups with df (1, 40) f value of 2943.69 and p value less than 0.001. Scanning and Transmission electron microscopy images were also taken into account to determine the extent of damage caused to the bacterial cells surface topography in Gram negative and Gram positive spectrums. The study demonstrated that single high exposure with the LLLT appears to have the most emphatic effect followed by exposure by MWD and MT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33732053
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.004
pii: S1319-562X(20)30660-4
pmc: PMC7938153
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1678-1686Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Apr;5(2):112-116
pubmed: 28367473
Future Microbiol. 2015;10(2):255-72
pubmed: 25689537
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(10):2439-50
pubmed: 17947985
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 23;10:1941
pubmed: 31507558
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jul 02;55(7):
pubmed: 31269767
Arch Physiol Biochem. 2019 May;125(2):93-103
pubmed: 29447000
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 21;7(7):e012150
pubmed: 28733294
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(49):e2202
pubmed: 26656352
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jun;49(6):2259-61
pubmed: 21490185
J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):179-86
pubmed: 26018310
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Apr 20;10:179-194
pubmed: 28461755
J Infect Public Health. 2018 Nov - Dec;11(6):812-816
pubmed: 29907439
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 May;66(5):2243-7
pubmed: 10788410
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Aug;54(8):3132-42
pubmed: 20530225
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Apr 2;84(8):
pubmed: 29427427
Lasers Surg Med. 2002;31(5):343-51
pubmed: 12430152
Biomed Eng Online. 2008 Jan 02;7:1
pubmed: 18171478
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015 Oct;48(10):945-52
pubmed: 26445339
Ann Saudi Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):513-6
pubmed: 22871621
Eur J Histochem. 2017 Aug 07;61(3):2800
pubmed: 29046049
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):DC17-20
pubmed: 26557520
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003 Oct;21(5):283-90
pubmed: 14651796