An Analysis of the Racial Disparities Among Cervical Cancer Patients Treated at an Academic Medical Center in the Southeastern United States.

cancer cervical cancer cervical oncology disparities gynae oncology gynaecology and obstetrics oncology racial disparities radiation radiation oncology

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez: 18 3 2021
pubmed: 19 3 2021
medline: 19 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Objective The purpose of this study was to identify racial disparities in treatment outcomes, if any, among patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated at a tertiary care institution in the state of Mississippi. Methods A retrospective review of patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated in the Department of Radiation Oncology at our institution between 2010 and 2018 was performed. Data regarding demographics, disease stage, treatments administered, and follow-up were collected. Patient outcomes, including median survival and overall survival, were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. All analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Results Between January 2010 and December 2018, a total of 165 patients with carcinoma of the cervix were treated at our institution. We had a significantly higher proportion of African American (AA) compared to Caucasian American (CA) patients (59.4 vs. 36.4%; p=0.03). There was a significant difference in the disease stage at the time of presentation between AA and CA in that compared to AA women, a higher number of CA patients presented with locally advanced disease [Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IB2 to IVA] (78.6 vs. 86.7%; p<0.001). However, a higher number of AA patients presented with metastatic disease at diagnosis compared to CA women (13.3 vs. 8.3%; p<0.001). Regarding their treatment, 157 (95.2%) underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy, while three (1.8%) had definitive surgery followed by adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation, depending on the risk factors identified operatively. The treatment details of five patients were not available. The median follow-up and the median survival of the entire cohort were 16 months and 79 months, respectively. In our cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival between AA and CA patients at either three years (80 vs. 68%; p=0.883) or five years (77 vs. 68%; p=0.883). As expected, patients with locally advanced disease showed a significantly better median survival of 79 months compared to only 11 months for those with metastatic disease at their presentation (p<0.001). Conclusions Our study revealed that more AA women presented with metastatic disease compared to CA women. However, our analysis did not identify any racial disparities in the prognosis of the entire cohort.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33732559
doi: 10.7759/cureus.13296
pmc: PMC7956045
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e13296

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021, Vengaloor Thomas et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J S C Med Assoc. 2009 Dec;105(7):237-44
pubmed: 20108710
Ethn Dis. 1992 Winter;2(1):47-54
pubmed: 1458215
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Dec;79(3):357-61
pubmed: 11104605
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 May;133(2):353-61
pubmed: 24406291
Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2 Suppl):348-58
pubmed: 17136766
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Mar;12(3):242s-247s
pubmed: 12646519
Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Oct;75(1):113-7
pubmed: 10502436
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172548
pubmed: 28234949
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 May;69(3):184-210
pubmed: 30875085
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004 Aug;15(3):375-89
pubmed: 15453176
Cancer Med. 2016 Aug;5(8):2126-35
pubmed: 27185053
Am J Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 01;7(1):1-12
pubmed: 28123843
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;150(1):73-78
pubmed: 29709291
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Jan - Feb;29(1):38-47
pubmed: 30401612
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;41(4):428-33
pubmed: 21961471
Pediatrics. 2011 Jan;127(1):77-84
pubmed: 21149425
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):319-325
pubmed: 27640961
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):595-601
pubmed: 31292103
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Nov;99(2):432-6
pubmed: 16137753
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Apr;20(4):591-9
pubmed: 21266522
South Med J. 2004 Mar;97(3):264-72
pubmed: 15043334
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 24;67(33):909-917
pubmed: 30138305
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e104344
pubmed: 25121587
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Nov;71(2):151-8
pubmed: 9826453
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Jun;24(6):506-14
pubmed: 26070037

Auteurs

Toms Vengaloor Thomas (T)

Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Shivanthidevi Gandhi (S)

Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Eldrin Bhanat (E)

Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Kati Krishna (K)

Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

William Robinson (W)

Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Mildred Ridgway (M)

Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Anu Abraham (A)

Pathology, Universtiy of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Srinivasan Vijayakumar (S)

Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Satya Packianathan (S)

Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Classifications MeSH