Rapid Report 3: Mental health symptoms, characteristics, and regional variation, for users of an Australian digital mental health service during the first 8 months of COVID-19.

Anxiety COVID-19 Coronavirus Depression Internet Mental health

Journal

Internet interventions
ISSN: 2214-7829
Titre abrégé: Internet Interv
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101631612

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 08 12 2020
revised: 15 02 2021
accepted: 22 02 2021
entrez: 18 3 2021
pubmed: 19 3 2021
medline: 19 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The MindSpot Clinic provides services to Australians with anxiety and depression. Routine data collection means that MindSpot has been able to monitor trends in mental health symptoms and service use prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and these have been reported in two earlier studies. This third study describes user characteristics and volumes in the first 8 months of COVID-19, including a comparison between users from states and territories with significantly different COVID-19 infection rates. We examined trends in demographics and symptoms for participants starting an online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic, from March to October 2020. Participants from the state of Victoria (n = 4203), which experienced a significantly larger rate of COVID-19 infections relative to the rest of Australia, were compared to participants from the rest of Australia (n = 10,500). Results were also compared to a baseline "comparison period" prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 14,703 people started a mental health assessment with MindSpot between 19th March and 28th October 2020. We observed two peaks in service demand, one in the early weeks of the pandemic, and the second in August-September when COVID-19 transmission was high in Victoria. Mean symptom scores on standardised measures of distress (K-10), depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) were lower during this second peak in service demand, but there were significantly higher levels of concern about COVID-19 in participants from Victoria, and a higher proportion of Victorian respondents reported that they had made significant changes in response to the pandemic. Many respondents reported changes to their mental health, such as increased feelings of worry. Most respondents reported implementing strategies to help manage the psychological impact of COVID-19, such as maintaining social connections and limiting exposure to news or social media. We did not observe increased levels of clinical anxiety or depression on standardised symptom measures. However, there were increases in service demand, and increased levels of concern and difficulties related to COVID-19, particularly in Victoria. Encouragingly, a significant proportion of participants have implemented coping strategies. These results continue to suggest that the mental health impacts of COVID-19 represent a normal response to an abnormal situation rather than an emerging mental health crisis. This distinction is important as we develop individually appropriate and proportional mental health system responses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The MindSpot Clinic provides services to Australians with anxiety and depression. Routine data collection means that MindSpot has been able to monitor trends in mental health symptoms and service use prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and these have been reported in two earlier studies. This third study describes user characteristics and volumes in the first 8 months of COVID-19, including a comparison between users from states and territories with significantly different COVID-19 infection rates.
METHODS METHODS
We examined trends in demographics and symptoms for participants starting an online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic, from March to October 2020. Participants from the state of Victoria (n = 4203), which experienced a significantly larger rate of COVID-19 infections relative to the rest of Australia, were compared to participants from the rest of Australia (n = 10,500). Results were also compared to a baseline "comparison period" prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 14,703 people started a mental health assessment with MindSpot between 19th March and 28th October 2020. We observed two peaks in service demand, one in the early weeks of the pandemic, and the second in August-September when COVID-19 transmission was high in Victoria. Mean symptom scores on standardised measures of distress (K-10), depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) were lower during this second peak in service demand, but there were significantly higher levels of concern about COVID-19 in participants from Victoria, and a higher proportion of Victorian respondents reported that they had made significant changes in response to the pandemic. Many respondents reported changes to their mental health, such as increased feelings of worry. Most respondents reported implementing strategies to help manage the psychological impact of COVID-19, such as maintaining social connections and limiting exposure to news or social media.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We did not observe increased levels of clinical anxiety or depression on standardised symptom measures. However, there were increases in service demand, and increased levels of concern and difficulties related to COVID-19, particularly in Victoria. Encouragingly, a significant proportion of participants have implemented coping strategies. These results continue to suggest that the mental health impacts of COVID-19 represent a normal response to an abnormal situation rather than an emerging mental health crisis. This distinction is important as we develop individually appropriate and proportional mental health system responses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33732628
doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100378
pii: S2214-7829(21)00018-X
pmc: PMC7937977
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100378

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: N. Titov and B. Dear are authors and developers of the treatment courses used at the MindSpot Clinic but derive no personal or financial benefit from them.

Références

Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;51(12):1227-1239
pubmed: 27733709
Internet Interv. 2020 Sep;21:100327
pubmed: 32537424
Med J Aust. 2020 Nov;213(10):458-464
pubmed: 33107063
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213(11):494-496.e1
pubmed: 33230817
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76
pubmed: 12214795
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov;2(11):e582-e593
pubmed: 33103097
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Internet Interv. 2020 Dec;22:100351
pubmed: 33110762

Auteurs

Lauren Staples (L)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.

Olav Nielssen (O)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.

Rony Kayrouz (R)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.

Shane Cross (S)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.

Eyal Karin (E)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.
eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Katie Ryan (K)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.

Blake Dear (B)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.
eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Nickolai Titov (N)

MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Australia.
eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH