Clinical management and outcomes of primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma - Experience from a sarcoma specialist unit.
Chemotherapy
Ovarian leiomyosarcoma
Ovary
Prognosis
Sarcoma
Treatment
Journal
Gynecologic oncology reports
ISSN: 2352-5789
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101652231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
19
12
2020
revised:
07
02
2021
accepted:
15
02
2021
entrez:
18
3
2021
pubmed:
19
3
2021
medline:
19
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ovarian sarcomas account for 1% of all ovarian malignancies and amongst these, primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma is the rarest subtype. Primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma has a very poor prognosis, with less than 20% of patients being alive at 5 years. Only a few cases have been published in the literature and there is very limited knowledge on the clinical behaviour and optimal management of these tumours. We have performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database to identify all primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma diagnosed and treated at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust between 1998 and 2020. Sixteen patients were identified from our database and fifteen were eligible for the analysis. Twelve patients presented with localized disease and underwent initial surgery and three patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Recurrence-free survival post-surgery was 16 months. Eight patients received first-line chemotherapy and four patients received second-line chemotherapy. Two patients had indolent metastatic disease and benefited from local therapies only. The median overall survival in the metastatic setting in our cohort was 51 months, which is consistent with previously published cases. Primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma is an extremely rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. This study is the largest case series of primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma published to date, providing clinically important information regarding survival and metastatic rate as well as treatment outcomes in the metastatic setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33732852
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100737
pii: S2352-5789(21)00042-4
pmc: PMC7941038
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
100737Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003 Mar 31;115(5-6):191-5
pubmed: 12741081
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2000 Dec;26(6):401-7
pubmed: 11152324
Ecancermedicalscience. 2015 Apr 21;9:524
pubmed: 25932048
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 2):639-641
pubmed: 27803531
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007 Jul;62(7):480-6
pubmed: 17572920
World J Oncol. 2011 Oct;2(5):265-266
pubmed: 29147259
Oncol Lett. 2016 Apr;11(4):2510-2514
pubmed: 27073508
Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Nov;28(11):1436-51
pubmed: 15489647
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Mar;48(3):389-93
pubmed: 8462904
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 May;97(2):697-9
pubmed: 15863185
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 May;124(9):1316-21
pubmed: 21740740
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Nov;24(9 Suppl 3):S61-6
pubmed: 25341583
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Sep;66(3):519-25
pubmed: 9299270
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Mar;283 Suppl 1:83-5
pubmed: 21061129
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991 Sep;115(9):941-5
pubmed: 1929791
J Postgrad Med. 1993 Jul-Sep;39(3):151-3
pubmed: 8051647
Curr Opin Oncol. 2013 Jul;25(4):384-9
pubmed: 23635801
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2005 Jan;48(1):19-20
pubmed: 16758777
Gynecol Oncol. 1987 Feb;26(2):183-92
pubmed: 3643159
Int Cancer Conf J. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11-15
pubmed: 31149505