Repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient and fat fraction measurement of focal myeloma lesions on whole body magnetic resonance imaging.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2021
01 Apr 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
19
3
2021
medline:
31
3
2021
entrez:
18
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess intra- and inter-reader variability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fat fraction (FF) measurement in focal myeloma bone lesions and the influence of lesion size. 22 myeloma patients with focal active disease on whole body MRI were included. Two readers outlined a small (5-10 mm) and large lesion (>10 mm) in each subject on derived ADC and FF maps; one reader performed this twice. Intra- and inter-reader agreement for small and large lesion groups were calculated for derived statistics from each map using within-subject standard deviation, coefficient of variation, interclass correlation coefficient measures, and visualized with Bland-Altman plots. For mean ADC, intra- and inter-reader repeatability demonstrated equivalently low coefficient of variation (3.0-3.6%) and excellent interclass correlation coefficient (0.975-0.982) for both small and large lesions. For mean FF, intra- and inter-reader repeatability was significantly poorer for small lesions compared to large lesions (intra-reader within-subject standard variation estimate is 2.7 times higher for small lesions than large lesions ( There is excellent intra- and inter-reader agreement for mean ADC estimates, even for lesions as small as 5 mm. For FF measurements, there is a significant increase in coefficient of variation for smaller lesions, suggesting lesions >10 mm should be selected for lesion FF measurement. ADC measurements of focal myeloma have excellent intra- and inter-reader agreement. FF measurements are more susceptible to lesion size as intra- and inter-reader agreement is significantly impaired in lesions less than 10 mm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33733812
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200682
pmc: PMC8010556
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20200682Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0116842
pubmed: 25706753
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180562
pubmed: 28672007
Br J Haematol. 2017 Aug;178(3):380-393
pubmed: 28677897
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Br J Haematol. 2017 Jan;176(2):222-233
pubmed: 27766627
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):5325-5336
pubmed: 28656463
Transl Oncol. 2009 Dec;2(4):231-5
pubmed: 19956383
Cancer Imaging. 2017 May 2;17(1):13
pubmed: 28464866
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):81-92
pubmed: 27317091
Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):785-94
pubmed: 24475858
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;14(3):169-186
pubmed: 27725679
Eur Radiol. 2011 Aug;21(8):1713-8
pubmed: 21472473
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):e538-48
pubmed: 25439696
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1198-203
pubmed: 23175485
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):5-13
pubmed: 30806604
Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2567-74
pubmed: 21822946
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Feb;85(2):373-82
pubmed: 26781143
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):W790-5
pubmed: 21606271