Outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Feasibility and patient satisfaction.


Journal

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
ISSN: 2468-7847
Titre abrégé: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101701588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 24 12 2020
accepted: 10 03 2021
pubmed: 20 3 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
entrez: 19 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is the standard surgery to correct apical pelvic organ prolapse. It is currently mainly practiced in the context of a conventional hospitalization, but more and more practitioners are developing it as an outpatient procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and patient satisfaction. This was a retrospective study comparing outpatients with inpatients who had undergone laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The main outcome was the rate of unscheduled visits and the number of early readmissions (i.e., <1 month). Secondary outcomes were complication rates and patient satisfaction. Eighty-four patients were included with 42 women in each group. The rate of unscheduled consultations was 16.7 % (n = 7/42) in the outpatient group and 21 % (n = 9/42) in the inpatient group. 2.4 % (n = 1/42) of outpatients and 4.8 % (n = 2/42) of inpatients were re-hospitalized within a month after surgery. The complication rate was not significantly different between the groups. In the outpatient group, 88.2 % of patients were satisfied compared with 97.5 % in the inpatient group (p = 0.17) CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy can be considered a safe and satisfactory option.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33737249
pii: S2468-7847(21)00060-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102118
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102118

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Sonia Guérin (S)

Department of Gynecology Obstetrics, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France; Department of Urology, Plérin Private hospital, Plérin, France. Electronic address: soniaguerin26@gmail.com.

Krystel Nyangoh Timoh (K)

Department of Gynecology Obstetrics, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Zine-Eddine Khene (ZE)

Departement of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Chloé Rousseau (C)

Department of Clinical investigation, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Yann Pierre Codet (YP)

Department of Urology, Plérin Private hospital, Plérin, France.

Raissa Braguet (R)

Department of Urology, Plérin Private hospital, Plérin, France.

François Trifard (F)

Department of Urology, Plérin Private hospital, Plérin, France.

Lucie Bruneau (L)

Departement of Gynecology Obstetrics, Plérin Private hospital, Plérin, France.

Vincent Lavoue (V)

Department of Gynecology Obstetrics, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Anne Cécile Pizzoferrato (AC)

Departement of Gynecology Obstetrics, Caen University Hospital, France.

Emmanuel Della Negra (E)

Department of Urology, Plérin Private hospital, Plérin, France.

Luc Corbel (L)

Department of Urology, Plérin Private hospital, Plérin, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH