The Cambridge Experience With Tibial Plateau Fractures in Older Adults: A Case Series.
comminuted fractures
knee injury
tibial fracture
tibial fractures
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Feb 2021
12 Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez:
19
3
2021
pubmed:
20
3
2021
medline:
20
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Complex tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) represent a significant treatment challenge for any Orthopaedic surgeon. Current literature suggests that significantly displaced TPFs in the elderly require operative fixation, an operation that is associated with serious complications including septic and post-operative arthritis. As a result, these patients are five times more likely to require a total knee replacement (TKR). We present a case series of five elderly patients with complex TPFs who made serendipitous recoveries while awaiting operations. Their fractures were deemed so severe that they were being considered for TKR instead of fixation. We discovered their surprising functional improvements while they were being reviewed pre-operatively and decided to delay operating. We are currently unaware of any cases in the literature that have reported such findings. In total, five patients presented in 2019 with closed, varus/valgus stable fractures. They were managed non-operatively in hinged-knee braces, progressively weight-bearing with a minimum follow-up of 10 months. Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) were recorded at zero and four months after their injury. All patients were female with an average age of 69 years. Average fracture depression - 8.48mm, average fracture split - 8.66mm, average OKS reduction - 19%. All patients were able to mobilise independently at four months follow-up. Our results suggest that non-operative management can be considered as primary management in elderly patients with significantly displaced TPFs. Should this fail, or they develop arthritis, a TKR can be performed. This carries two benefits: the patient avoids the significant complications associated with fixation and should a TKR be required, it can more easily be performed in a patient without metalwork in-situ. We feel that the results from this case series might offer insight into a new treatment strategy and continue to closely follow these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33738157
doi: 10.7759/cureus.13311
pmc: PMC7958933
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13311Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Sharma et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J South Orthop Assoc. 2002 Winter;11(4):218-26
pubmed: 12597066
Curr Orthop Pract. 2017 Nov;28(6):580-585
pubmed: 29177024
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 May;77(5):661-73
pubmed: 7744891
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 15;96(2):144-50
pubmed: 24430414
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Dec;50(6):702-705
pubmed: 27889405
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jan-Feb;(138):94-104
pubmed: 445923
Injury. 1995 Jun;26(5):291-7
pubmed: 7649642
J Knee Surg. 2014 Feb;27(1):11-9
pubmed: 24343428
Injury. 2006 Jun;37(6):475-84
pubmed: 16118010
Orthop Rev. 1994 Feb;23(2):149-54
pubmed: 8196973
Am J Knee Surg. 2001 Spring;14(2):125-8
pubmed: 11401171
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jan;95-B(1):45-51
pubmed: 23307672
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2170-2
pubmed: 26195353