Outcomes and Tendon Integrity After Arthroscopic Treatment for Articular-Sided Partial-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon: Results at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PASTA repair PTRCT debridement direct MR arthrography partial-thickness tear rotator cuff

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 01 09 2020
accepted: 10 09 2020
entrez: 19 3 2021
pubmed: 20 3 2021
medline: 20 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The best surgical treatment option for symptomatic moderate- to high-grade articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported and clinical outcomes and tendon integrity after arthroscopic debridement or repair for PTRCTs at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. We hypothesized that the overall outcomes would be positive, showing pain relief, good shoulder function, and high tendon integrity. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. We evaluated 30 patients (16 men, 14 women; mean age, 51 years) who underwent arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic PTRCTs (Ellman grades 2 and 3). Debridement was performed in 15 patients, and arthroscopic tendon repair was performed in the remaining 15 patients. Patients completed the Constant score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; Simple Shoulder Test; and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, function, and satisfaction. In addition, patients were examined clinically (range of motion, impingement tests, rotator cuff tests, and tests for the long head of the biceps tendon), and morphologic assessment of rotator cuff integrity was performed using direct magnetic resonance arthrography and was classified according to Sugaya. The mean follow-up period was 55 months. The patient-reported outcome measures showed high patient satisfaction, reduction in persistent pain, and good shoulder function. Linear regression analysis showed that the debridement group had significantly better results on the Constant (bias-corrected and accelerated [BCa] 95% CI, 4.20-26.30), ASES (BCa 95% CI, 5.24-39.26), and VAS (pain: BCa 95% CI, 0.13-3.62; function: BCa 95% CI, 1.04-4.84; satisfaction: BCa 95% CI, 0.14-6.28) scores than did the repair group. At follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups in clinical testing results. Good supraspinatus tendon integrity was seen in most patients: Sugaya classification grade 1 in 13 patients, grade 2 in 11 patients, and grade 3 in 6 patients. Midterm results after arthroscopic debridement and repair for PTRCTs showed high patient satisfaction, good shoulder function, and high tendon integrity for both procedures. Patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement had higher Constant, ASES, and VAS scores compared with patients who underwent tendon repair.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The best surgical treatment option for symptomatic moderate- to high-grade articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) is still controversial.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported and clinical outcomes and tendon integrity after arthroscopic debridement or repair for PTRCTs at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. We hypothesized that the overall outcomes would be positive, showing pain relief, good shoulder function, and high tendon integrity.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS METHODS
We evaluated 30 patients (16 men, 14 women; mean age, 51 years) who underwent arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic PTRCTs (Ellman grades 2 and 3). Debridement was performed in 15 patients, and arthroscopic tendon repair was performed in the remaining 15 patients. Patients completed the Constant score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; Simple Shoulder Test; and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, function, and satisfaction. In addition, patients were examined clinically (range of motion, impingement tests, rotator cuff tests, and tests for the long head of the biceps tendon), and morphologic assessment of rotator cuff integrity was performed using direct magnetic resonance arthrography and was classified according to Sugaya.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean follow-up period was 55 months. The patient-reported outcome measures showed high patient satisfaction, reduction in persistent pain, and good shoulder function. Linear regression analysis showed that the debridement group had significantly better results on the Constant (bias-corrected and accelerated [BCa] 95% CI, 4.20-26.30), ASES (BCa 95% CI, 5.24-39.26), and VAS (pain: BCa 95% CI, 0.13-3.62; function: BCa 95% CI, 1.04-4.84; satisfaction: BCa 95% CI, 0.14-6.28) scores than did the repair group. At follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups in clinical testing results. Good supraspinatus tendon integrity was seen in most patients: Sugaya classification grade 1 in 13 patients, grade 2 in 11 patients, and grade 3 in 6 patients.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Midterm results after arthroscopic debridement and repair for PTRCTs showed high patient satisfaction, good shoulder function, and high tendon integrity for both procedures. Patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement had higher Constant, ASES, and VAS scores compared with patients who underwent tendon repair.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33738311
doi: 10.1177/2325967120985106
pii: 10.1177_2325967120985106
pmc: PMC7934052
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2325967120985106

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Références

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):68-73
pubmed: 8020236
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):82-83
pubmed: 29304985
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Sep-Oct;17(5):722-8
pubmed: 18558498
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):75-81
pubmed: 29100763
Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov;31(11):2191-8
pubmed: 26188786
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):609-16
pubmed: 20171904
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):79-86
pubmed: 28949249
Arthroscopy. 1999 Mar;15(2):126-31
pubmed: 10210067
Arthroscopy. 2011 Apr;27(4):568-80
pubmed: 21296545
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91(5):1055-62
pubmed: 19411453
Musculoskelet Surg. 2013 Aug;97 Suppl 2:S197-202
pubmed: 23949942
Arthroscopy. 2016 Aug;32(8):1523-8
pubmed: 27039963
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Oct;16(10):967-72
pubmed: 18712359
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2041-7
pubmed: 23880402
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Mar 27;5(3):2325967117697375
pubmed: 28451606
Orthopedics. 2003 Apr;26(4):387-90; discussion 390
pubmed: 12722909
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):113-124
pubmed: 28526996
Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):160-8
pubmed: 22078003
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2623-33
pubmed: 21084574
Acta Radiol. 2010 Mar;51(2):194-201
pubmed: 20001474
Arthroscopy. 2004 Sep;20(7):705-11
pubmed: 15346112
Int Orthop. 2013 Aug;37(8):1487-93
pubmed: 23580030
Arthroscopy. 2006 Jan;22(1):44-9
pubmed: 16399460
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):60-7
pubmed: 8020235
Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):474-80
pubmed: 22277761
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Dec;137(12):1719-1724
pubmed: 28942510
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):64-74
pubmed: 2182260
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jun;468(6):1514-20
pubmed: 20049567
Arthroscopy. 2005 Mar;21(3):376-81
pubmed: 15756195
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):451-6
pubmed: 24318610
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2151-2156
pubmed: 27106924
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2073-2080
pubmed: 27904936
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):257-60
pubmed: 11912097
Am J Sports Med. 1997 May-Jun;25(3):299-305
pubmed: 9167807
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Feb;23(2):460-3
pubmed: 23689964
Arthroscopy. 2005 Nov;21(11):1307-16
pubmed: 16325080
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):25-33
pubmed: 22000411

Auteurs

Matthias Brockmeyer (M)

Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Alexander Haupert (A)

Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Anna-Lena Lausch (AL)

Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Gudrun Wagenpfeil (G)

Institute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Jonas Stroeder (J)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Guenther Schneider (G)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Dieter Kohn (D)

Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Olaf Lorbach (O)

Department of Shoulder Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Schön Klinik Lorsch, Lorsch, Germany.

Classifications MeSH