Heterogeneity of Recent Phase 3 Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Clinical Trials.
acute pyelonephritis
cUTI
carbapenem resistance
study design
Journal
Open forum infectious diseases
ISSN: 2328-8957
Titre abrégé: Open Forum Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101637045
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
18
09
2020
accepted:
28
01
2021
entrez:
19
3
2021
pubmed:
20
3
2021
medline:
20
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For new antibiotics developed to treat antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory pathway includes complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) clinical trials in which the clinical isolates are susceptible to the active control. This allows for inferential testing in a noninferiority study design. Although complying with regulatory guidelines, individual clinical trials may differ substantially in design and patient population. To determine variables that impacted patient selection and outcome parameters, 6 recent cUTI trials that were pivotal to an new drug application (NDA) submission were reviewed. This selective descriptive analysis utilized cUTI trial data, obtained from publicly disclosed information including FDA documents and peer-reviewed publications, from 6 new antibiotics developed to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and fosfomycin. Eravacycline was not approved for cUTI and is not included. Microbiologic modified intent-to-treat sample size, age, proportions of female patients, acute pyelonephritis (AP), A study design can follow regulatory guidelines but still have variable populations. The proportion of AP within a study varied greatly and influenced population demographics (age, gender) and baseline microbiology. A smaller proportion of AP resulted in an older patient population, fewer females, less
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
For new antibiotics developed to treat antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory pathway includes complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) clinical trials in which the clinical isolates are susceptible to the active control. This allows for inferential testing in a noninferiority study design. Although complying with regulatory guidelines, individual clinical trials may differ substantially in design and patient population. To determine variables that impacted patient selection and outcome parameters, 6 recent cUTI trials that were pivotal to an new drug application (NDA) submission were reviewed.
METHODS
METHODS
This selective descriptive analysis utilized cUTI trial data, obtained from publicly disclosed information including FDA documents and peer-reviewed publications, from 6 new antibiotics developed to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and fosfomycin. Eravacycline was not approved for cUTI and is not included.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Microbiologic modified intent-to-treat sample size, age, proportions of female patients, acute pyelonephritis (AP),
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A study design can follow regulatory guidelines but still have variable populations. The proportion of AP within a study varied greatly and influenced population demographics (age, gender) and baseline microbiology. A smaller proportion of AP resulted in an older patient population, fewer females, less
Identifiants
pubmed: 33738315
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab045
pii: ofab045
pmc: PMC7953653
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
ofab045Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Références
Lancet. 2015 May 16;385(9981):1949-56
pubmed: 25931244
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):729-740
pubmed: 30786187
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Dec;38 Suppl:64-70
pubmed: 22018988
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 01;4(2):ofx063
pubmed: 28584849
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;55(7):943-50
pubmed: 22752516
JAMA. 2018 Feb 27;319(8):788-799
pubmed: 29486041
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 27;69(12):2045-2056
pubmed: 30861061
Postgrad Med. 2020 Apr;132(3):234-250
pubmed: 31608743
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;20(7):1170-5
pubmed: 24959688
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;18(12):1319-1328
pubmed: 30509675
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 15;63(6):754-762
pubmed: 27313268
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 15;49(8):1175-84
pubmed: 19739972
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Sep;20(9):862-72
pubmed: 24890393