A realist evaluation of a collaborative model to support research co-production in long-term care settings in England: the ExCHANGE protocol.
Care homes
Collaboration
Evidence-informed practice
Implementation
Knowledge brokering
Knowledge mobilisation
Realist evaluation
Wellbeing
Journal
Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Mar 2021
20 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
11
10
2020
accepted:
22
02
2021
entrez:
21
3
2021
pubmed:
22
3
2021
medline:
22
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Collaborative working between academic institutions and those who provide health and social care has been identified as integral in order to produce acceptable, relevant, and timely research, and for outputs to be useful and practical to implement. The ExCHANGE Collaboration aims to bring together researchers and people working, living in and visiting care homes to build capacity, share and mobilise knowledge, and identify key areas for future research. This paper describes an embedded, formative, realist and theory-driven evaluation which aims to gather information about how successful the ExCHANGE Collaboration is perceived to be in achieving its aims. An existing realist programme theory from the literature - Closer Collaboration - will be supplemented by two substantive theories: Co-production and Knowledge Brokering. This will result in an initial programme theory which will be tested by this formative evaluation to refine understanding of how the ExCHANGE Collaboration works. The evaluation will employ mixed qualitative methods, including: analysis of documents such as feedback forms, Knowledge Broker journal/diary, event attendance records, risk and issues logs and other relevant paperwork gathered as part of project delivery; observations of events/activities; and interviews with care home providers and staff, care home residents, residents' family members, and researchers who are involved in the project (both project design/delivery, and also attendance or involvement in project activities/events). Framework Analysis will be used to interpret the data collected; analysis will be strategic, by focusing on particular key areas of importance in the developing theory of how the ExCHANGE Collaboration might achieve change. The results of this study are expected to be published in 2022. This evaluation will investigate how successful the ExCHANGE Collaboration is perceived to be in achieving its aims, in what way, in which contexts, and how this may differ for those involved. It will do this by testing an initial programme theory about how the collaboration works, for whom, under which circumstances, and in what way. Findings will be shared through written publication, an end of project learning event for those involved/interested in the project, and a lay summary to be made publically available.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Collaborative working between academic institutions and those who provide health and social care has been identified as integral in order to produce acceptable, relevant, and timely research, and for outputs to be useful and practical to implement. The ExCHANGE Collaboration aims to bring together researchers and people working, living in and visiting care homes to build capacity, share and mobilise knowledge, and identify key areas for future research. This paper describes an embedded, formative, realist and theory-driven evaluation which aims to gather information about how successful the ExCHANGE Collaboration is perceived to be in achieving its aims. An existing realist programme theory from the literature - Closer Collaboration - will be supplemented by two substantive theories: Co-production and Knowledge Brokering. This will result in an initial programme theory which will be tested by this formative evaluation to refine understanding of how the ExCHANGE Collaboration works.
METHODS
METHODS
The evaluation will employ mixed qualitative methods, including: analysis of documents such as feedback forms, Knowledge Broker journal/diary, event attendance records, risk and issues logs and other relevant paperwork gathered as part of project delivery; observations of events/activities; and interviews with care home providers and staff, care home residents, residents' family members, and researchers who are involved in the project (both project design/delivery, and also attendance or involvement in project activities/events). Framework Analysis will be used to interpret the data collected; analysis will be strategic, by focusing on particular key areas of importance in the developing theory of how the ExCHANGE Collaboration might achieve change.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The results of this study are expected to be published in 2022.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This evaluation will investigate how successful the ExCHANGE Collaboration is perceived to be in achieving its aims, in what way, in which contexts, and how this may differ for those involved. It will do this by testing an initial programme theory about how the collaboration works, for whom, under which circumstances, and in what way. Findings will be shared through written publication, an end of project learning event for those involved/interested in the project, and a lay summary to be made publically available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33743827
doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00257-2
pii: 10.1186/s40900-021-00257-2
pmc: PMC7980357
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
18Subventions
Organisme : Alzheimer's Society (UK)
ID : 504 (AS-CC-18-008)
Références
Gerontologist. 2012 Oct;52(5):597-606
pubmed: 22394494
Health Expect. 2015 Feb;18(1):8-21
pubmed: 23216859
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug;19(8):3-14
pubmed: 31339831
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):801-5
pubmed: 24894592
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jan 28;5(4):221-3
pubmed: 27239867
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 17;11:38
pubmed: 26988000
Qual Health Res. 2015 Nov;25(11):1477-91
pubmed: 25854617
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):70-80
pubmed: 27129492
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):67-73
pubmed: 29866766
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1326-34
pubmed: 20170999
Public Health. 2014 Jun;128(6):533-44
pubmed: 24684852
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):746-755
pubmed: 31826921
Evid Policy. 2009 Aug;5(3):267-279
pubmed: 21258626
Fam Community Health. 2015 Jan-Mar;38(1):120-30
pubmed: 25423250
Nature. 2010 Aug 5;466(7307):685-7
pubmed: 20686547
Implement Sci. 2018 Aug 15;13(1):111
pubmed: 30111339
Res Nurs Health. 2018 Jun;41(3):228-242
pubmed: 29485197
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(4):1273-1281
pubmed: 29920906