Sexuality and Multiple Sclerosis: Patient and Doctor Perspectives.


Journal

The journal of sexual medicine
ISSN: 1743-6109
Titre abrégé: J Sex Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101230693

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 02 10 2020
revised: 11 12 2020
accepted: 16 01 2021
pubmed: 22 3 2021
medline: 20 5 2021
entrez: 21 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Little is known on how to address sexuality in clinical care for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). To describe and contrast the perception of sexuality and associated aspects of communication in pwMS and their treating neurologists ("MSologists") and provide a standard of care. Patients were surveyed using a 13-item questionnaire investigating perception on their own sexuality and opinions on communication about sexuality in context with MS. Certified MSologists in Austria received an 18-item survey regarding their approach to taking a sexual history of their patients. We report the frequency of answers given in this survey and propose a possible standard of care how sexuality could be addressed in clinical routine. Ninety-three pwMS (mean age 39 ± 11 years, 57% female) and 75 MSologists (mean age 43 ± 9 years, 63% male) completed this survey. Seventy-six percent of patients report their own sexuality as being (very) important to them and 95% think that sexual dysfunction would influence their quality of life. 84% would like to be asked about their sexuality by their MSologist. In contrast, only 15% of MSologists reported discussing sexuality with every patient. The most common reason for not doing so was a fear of crossing personal borders (34%). There is a strong desire for further medical education on this subject (76%). Discussing sexuality is important to pwMS and MSologists should consider their patients' wishes and needs to talk about it. This is the largest survey contrasting the views of patients and their treating physicians on the topic of communication about sexuality. The use of an empirical unvalidated questionnaire may have introduced bias. Moreover, patients that are open to talk about their sexuality may be potentially overrepresented in this study. MSologists should offer their patients an open opportunity and appropriate framework to discuss their sexuality during a consultation. Altmann P, Leithner K, Leutmezer F, et al. Sexuality and Multiple Sclerosis: Patient and Doctor Perspectives. J Sex Med 2021;18:743-749.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Little is known on how to address sexuality in clinical care for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).
AIM
To describe and contrast the perception of sexuality and associated aspects of communication in pwMS and their treating neurologists ("MSologists") and provide a standard of care.
METHODS
Patients were surveyed using a 13-item questionnaire investigating perception on their own sexuality and opinions on communication about sexuality in context with MS. Certified MSologists in Austria received an 18-item survey regarding their approach to taking a sexual history of their patients.
OUTCOMES
We report the frequency of answers given in this survey and propose a possible standard of care how sexuality could be addressed in clinical routine.
RESULTS
Ninety-three pwMS (mean age 39 ± 11 years, 57% female) and 75 MSologists (mean age 43 ± 9 years, 63% male) completed this survey. Seventy-six percent of patients report their own sexuality as being (very) important to them and 95% think that sexual dysfunction would influence their quality of life. 84% would like to be asked about their sexuality by their MSologist. In contrast, only 15% of MSologists reported discussing sexuality with every patient. The most common reason for not doing so was a fear of crossing personal borders (34%). There is a strong desire for further medical education on this subject (76%).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Discussing sexuality is important to pwMS and MSologists should consider their patients' wishes and needs to talk about it.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS
This is the largest survey contrasting the views of patients and their treating physicians on the topic of communication about sexuality. The use of an empirical unvalidated questionnaire may have introduced bias. Moreover, patients that are open to talk about their sexuality may be potentially overrepresented in this study.
CONCLUSION
MSologists should offer their patients an open opportunity and appropriate framework to discuss their sexuality during a consultation. Altmann P, Leithner K, Leutmezer F, et al. Sexuality and Multiple Sclerosis: Patient and Doctor Perspectives. J Sex Med 2021;18:743-749.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33744180
pii: S1743-6095(21)00224-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.01.178
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

743-749

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Patrick Altmann (P)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Katharina Leithner (K)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria.

Fritz Leutmezer (F)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Tobias Monschein (T)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Markus Ponleitner (M)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Miranda Stattmann (M)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Paulus Stefan Rommer (PS)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Tobias Zrzavy (T)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Gudrun Zulehner (G)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Klaus Berek (K)

Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Neurology, Innsbruck, Austria.

Thomas Berger (T)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria.

Gabriel Bsteh (G)

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Neurology, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: gabriel.bsteh@meduniwien.ac.at.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH