The occurrence of parasitic copepods and isopods infesting the marine teleost fishes of Kerala coast, India.

Copepods Fecundity Intensity Isopods Prevalence

Journal

Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology
ISSN: 0971-7196
Titre abrégé: J Parasit Dis
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9713059

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 07 05 2020
accepted: 03 09 2020
entrez: 22 3 2021
pubmed: 23 3 2021
medline: 23 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The present study reports the occurrence of parasitic copepods and isopods infecting marine teleost fishes from the Kerala coast, India. A total of 1795 fishes belonging to 38 species were collected from the fish landing centres across the Kerala Coast for 5 months. The isopod & copepod infection status of these fishes were assessed. The incidents of site-specific infection were documented for all parasites and a fecundity analysis was conducted in randomly selected species. The single or multiple parasitic crustacean infestation and host preference (single or multiple hosts) were also documented. A total of 32 species of copepods and 6 species of isopod were sourced out. However, the maximum prevalence was recorded for the family Lernanthropidae (71.43%) and the maximum intensity (14) was recorded for a Caligid copepod Euryphorus nordmannii. The predominantly targeted region of infection on the host fish appeared to be gill filament (52.15%). The fecundity showed significant differences between the tested species. Fourteen species of fishes showed multiple parasitic crustacean infestation and eight species of parasites infected multiple hosts. The present study demonstrates that over 68% of marine fish species of Kerala coast were under heavy infection either by isopods or copepods.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33746390
doi: 10.1007/s12639-020-01268-8
pii: 1268
pmc: PMC7921264
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

78-88

Informations de copyright

© Indian Society for Parasitology 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no financial or personal conflict that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Références

Parasitol Res. 2007 May;100(6):1193-204
pubmed: 17219222
J Parasit Dis. 2014 Mar;38(1):138-41
pubmed: 24505194
J Parasit Dis. 2013 Apr;37(1):118-24
pubmed: 24431552
Zool Stud. 2015 May 20;54:e42
pubmed: 31966129
Acta Parasitol. 2013 Mar;58(1):80-90
pubmed: 23377916
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35350
pubmed: 22558143
Zookeys. 2014 Nov 25;(457):339-53
pubmed: 25561846
Syst Parasitol. 2010 May;76(1):19-38
pubmed: 20401576
Parasitology. 1994;109 Suppl:S69-84
pubmed: 7854853
J Parasitol. 1997 Aug;83(4):575-83
pubmed: 9267395
J Parasit Dis. 2016 Dec;40(4):1270-1277
pubmed: 27876929
Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2007;31(1):79-83
pubmed: 17471420

Auteurs

Thasnim S Nizar (TS)

Department of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Periye, Kasaragod, Kerala India.

Megha Raveendran (M)

Department of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Periye, Kasaragod, Kerala India.

Sisira Chenkayi Parambil (S)

Department of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Periye, Kasaragod, Kerala India.

Sudha Kappalli (S)

Department of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Periye, Kasaragod, Kerala India.

Classifications MeSH