The Cologne Picture Naming Test for Language Mapping and Monitoring (CoNaT): An Open Set of 100 Black and White Object Drawings.
German
TMS
assessment
brain tumour
intraoperative
language
neuromonitoring
picture naming
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
24
11
2020
accepted:
12
01
2021
entrez:
22
3
2021
pubmed:
23
3
2021
medline:
23
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Language assessment using a picture naming task crucially relies on the interpretation of the given verbal response by the rater. To avoid misinterpretations, a language-specific and linguistically controlled set of unambiguous, clearly identifiable and common object-word pairs is mandatory. We, here, set out to provide an open-source set of black and white object drawings, particularly suited for language mapping and monitoring, e.g., during awake brain tumour surgery or transcranial magnetic stimulation, in German language. A refined set of 100 black and white drawings was tested in two consecutive runs of randomised picture order and was analysed in respect of correct, prompt, and reliable object recognition and naming in a series of 132 healthy subjects between 18 and 84 years (median 25 years, 64% females) and a clinical pilot cohort of 10 brain tumour patients (median age 47 years, 80% males). The influence of important word- and subject-related factors on task performance and reliability was investigated. Overall, across both healthy subjects and patients, excellent correct object naming rates (97 vs. 96%) as well as high reliability coefficients (Goodman-Kruskal's gamma = 0.95 vs. 0.86) were found. However, the analysis of variance revealed a significant, overall negative effect of low word frequency (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33746888
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.633068
pmc: PMC7966504
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
633068Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Weiss Lucas, Pieczewski, Kochs, Nettekoven, Grefkes, Goldbrunner and Jonas.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Lang Speech. 1997 Jul-Sep;40 ( Pt 3):211-28
pubmed: 9509578
Cognition. 1999 Nov 9;73(1):B1-B15
pubmed: 10536225
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215
pubmed: 7373248
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 26;113(30):E4367-76
pubmed: 27402738
Brain Lang. 1996 Apr;53(1):105-20
pubmed: 8722902
J Neurosurg Sci. 2014 Dec;58(4):199-213
pubmed: 25418274
J Neurosurg Sci. 2017 Dec;61(6):612-630
pubmed: 28263047
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 Oct;11(6):716-26
pubmed: 16248907
Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Jan;40(1):29-35
pubmed: 27194132
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jan;63(1):33-37
pubmed: 31352062
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013 Feb;19(2):119-26
pubmed: 23237304
J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Mar 15;204(2):349-54
pubmed: 22108143
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
J Neurosurg Sci. 2015 Dec;59(4):351-60
pubmed: 26394241
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1491-1508
pubmed: 31437012
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1430-1445
pubmed: 32324437
Cognition. 2006 Mar;99(2):205-35
pubmed: 15939415
Neuropsychologia. 1995 Oct;33(10):1281-303
pubmed: 8552229
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Dec;16(6):939-42
pubmed: 7890827
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Feb;50(1):196-213
pubmed: 17344559
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):961-70
pubmed: 22351613
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:449-456
pubmed: 28419879
Lang Speech. 2005;48(Pt 2):123-56
pubmed: 16411502
Psychol Aging. 1988 Jun;3(2):173-8
pubmed: 3268256
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(10):1637-53
pubmed: 11992652
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Jun;25(4):463-92
pubmed: 18704797
Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):1-22
pubmed: 1582153
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Nov;32(4):588-615
pubmed: 11189860
PLoS One. 2010 May 24;5(5):e10773
pubmed: 20532245
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Sep;70(9):718-26
pubmed: 22990731
Q J Exp Psychol. 1965 Nov;17(4):273-81
pubmed: 5852918
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jun;30(6):1845-56
pubmed: 19378277
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e106953
pubmed: 25211489
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):13-37
pubmed: 24889119
J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Jun;37(3):629-44
pubmed: 8084193
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Nov;31(4):650-8
pubmed: 10633980
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Jan;18(1):81-9
pubmed: 14591480
Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 1;176:215-225
pubmed: 29704615
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;22(6):517-530
pubmed: 29609894
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Feb;36(1):140-55
pubmed: 15190709
Brain Cogn. 2003 Nov;53(2):243-6
pubmed: 14607157
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 02;8:660
pubmed: 25228868
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1301-8
pubmed: 24590468
J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(5):553-67
pubmed: 9802989
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Jul 29;354(1387):1229-38
pubmed: 10466148
J Neurosurg. 1979 Feb;50(2):164-9
pubmed: 430127
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Aug;14(6):489-96
pubmed: 14590576
Neuroimage. 2007 May 15;36(1):202-8
pubmed: 17407824