Teriflunomide treatment is associated with optic nerve recovery in early multiple sclerosis.

disease-modifying treatment multiple sclerosis optic neuritis teriflunomide

Journal

Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders
ISSN: 1756-2856
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Neurol Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101480242

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 06 01 2021
accepted: 22 01 2021
entrez: 22 3 2021
pubmed: 23 3 2021
medline: 23 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Various attempts have been made to support recovery following optic neuritis (ON), but the respective trials have mostly been negative. The aim of this study was to determine whether disease-modifying treatment (DMT) following ON as first manifestation of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis influences long-term outcomes. A total of 79 patients with ON were identified and evaluated at relapse, DMT induction, and 12 months following treatment induction with either glatiramer acetate (GLAT), interferon-beta (IFN), or teriflunomide (TRF). Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) and full-field visual-evoked potentials (FF-VEP) were compared between treatment groups using multivariable regression models. The impact of TRF treatment induction compared with IFN or GLAT following relapses outside the optic nerves was evaluated in an independent cohort of 122 patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and rates of confirmed improvement of relapse-related disability were evaluated. TRF-treated patients exhibited higher LCLA and lower relative P100 latencies normalized to the fellow-eye. Findings were significant following covariate-adjustment by multivariable analyses. Cranial MRI lesion load as well as disability progression rates were not significantly different between groups. The cohort of patients following relapses other than ON showed no differences in confirmed improvement of disability. TRF treatment is associated with favorable outcomes regarding functional optic nerve recovery following ON in early multiple sclerosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Various attempts have been made to support recovery following optic neuritis (ON), but the respective trials have mostly been negative. The aim of this study was to determine whether disease-modifying treatment (DMT) following ON as first manifestation of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis influences long-term outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 79 patients with ON were identified and evaluated at relapse, DMT induction, and 12 months following treatment induction with either glatiramer acetate (GLAT), interferon-beta (IFN), or teriflunomide (TRF). Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) and full-field visual-evoked potentials (FF-VEP) were compared between treatment groups using multivariable regression models. The impact of TRF treatment induction compared with IFN or GLAT following relapses outside the optic nerves was evaluated in an independent cohort of 122 patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and rates of confirmed improvement of relapse-related disability were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
TRF-treated patients exhibited higher LCLA and lower relative P100 latencies normalized to the fellow-eye. Findings were significant following covariate-adjustment by multivariable analyses. Cranial MRI lesion load as well as disability progression rates were not significantly different between groups. The cohort of patients following relapses other than ON showed no differences in confirmed improvement of disability.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
TRF treatment is associated with favorable outcomes regarding functional optic nerve recovery following ON in early multiple sclerosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33747129
doi: 10.1177/1756286421997372
pii: 10.1177_1756286421997372
pmc: PMC7940774
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1756286421997372

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement: Steffen Pfeuffer: received travel grants from Sanofi Genzyme and Merck Serono, lecturing honoraria from Sanofi Genzyme, Mylan Healthcare, and Biogen, and research support from Diamed, Merck Serono, and the German Multiple Sclerosis Society Northrhine-Westphalia. Laura Kerschke: declares no conflicts of interest Tobias Ruck: received travel grants and financial research support from Genzyme and Novartis and received honoraria for lecturing from Roche, Merck, Genzyme, Biogen, and Teva. Leoni Rolfes: received travel grants from Merck Serono and Sanofi-Genzyme. Marc Pawlitzki: received speaker honoraria and travel reimbursements from Novartis. Philipp Albrecht: received compensation for serving on Scientific Advisory Boards for Allergan, Biogen, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Roche. He received speaker honoraria and travel support from Allergan, Bayer Vital GmbH, Biogen, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Roche. Philipp Albrecht received research support from Allergan, Biogen, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Roche. Heinz Wiendl: received compensation for serving on Scientific Advisory Boards/Steering Committees for Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Novartis. He received speaker honoraria and travel support from Bayer Vital GmbH, Bayer Schering AG, Biogen, CSL Behring, EMD Serono, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Omniamed, Novartis, and Sanofi Aventis. He received compensation as a consultant from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Heinz Wiendl also received research support from Bayer Healthcare, Bayer Vital, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Sanofi US, and Teva. Sven G. Meuth: received honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings from Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Celgene, Diamed, Genzyme, MedDay Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ONO Pharma, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Chugai Pharma, QuintilesIMS, and Teva. His research is funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation, German Academic Exchange Service, Hertie Foundation, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies (IZKF) Muenster, German Foundation Neurology and by Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Biogen, Diamed, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, ONO Pharma, Roche, and Teva. The current work was conducted outside of third-party funding.

Références

Ophthalmology. 2008 Jun;115(6):1079-1082.e5
pubmed: 17976727
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51645
pubmed: 23272128
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 Aug 09;4(5):e390
pubmed: 28828394
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2481-2489
pubmed: 29029896
BMC Neurol. 2020 Mar 3;20(1):75
pubmed: 32126977
Eye Brain. 2016 Oct 26;8:195-202
pubmed: 28539814
Mult Scler. 2014 May;20(6):705-16
pubmed: 24126064
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Mar;16(3):189-199
pubmed: 28229892
Brain. 2020 Apr 1;143(4):1127-1142
pubmed: 32293668
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):734-747
pubmed: 28206829
Mult Scler. 2016 Apr;22(5):649-58
pubmed: 26227005
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015 Jul 23;2(4):e135
pubmed: 26236761
J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Sep 22;13(1):250
pubmed: 27658519
J Neuroinflammation. 2018 Jul 3;15(1):194
pubmed: 29970109
J Neurol. 2013 Oct;260(10):2472-80
pubmed: 23852658
Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 Mar;123(3):207-10
pubmed: 20569226
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jun;119(6):1250-7
pubmed: 22365058
Neurology. 2019 Apr 16;92(16):e1811-e1820
pubmed: 30877188
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul;128(7):1234-1245
pubmed: 28531809
J Neuroinflammation. 2018 Mar 13;15(1):76
pubmed: 29534752
Sci Transl Med. 2019 May 1;11(490):
pubmed: 31043571
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Mar;15(3):259-69
pubmed: 26822749
CNS Drugs. 2016 Feb;30(2):135-47
pubmed: 26715391

Auteurs

Steffen Pfeuffer (S)

Department of Neurology and Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.

Laura Kerschke (L)

Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Tobias Ruck (T)

Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Leoni Rolfes (L)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Marc Pawlitzki (M)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Philipp Albrecht (P)

Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Heinz Wiendl (H)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Sven G Meuth (SG)

Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Classifications MeSH