Treatment satisfaction in 5q-spinal muscular atrophy under nusinersen therapy.

TSQM-1.4© antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen patient-reported outcome measures spinal muscular atrophy treatment satisfaction

Journal

Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders
ISSN: 1756-2856
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Neurol Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101480242

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 21 12 2020
accepted: 11 01 2021
entrez: 22 3 2021
pubmed: 23 3 2021
medline: 23 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Nusinersen was the first approved disease-modifying therapy for all 5q-spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients regardless of age or disease severity. Its efficacy in adults has recently been demonstrated in a large cohort by motor outcome measures, which were only partially suitable to detect changes in very mildly or severely affected patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) have been suggested as a valuable addition. Here, we aimed to assess treatment satisfaction and investigate whether it may be a useful PRO to monitor SMA patients. We enrolled 91 mainly adult 5q-SMA patients treated with nusinersen in a national, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study. 21 patients underwent longitudinal follow up. Patients' satisfaction with treatment in four dimensions (global, effectiveness, convenience, side effects) was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication German version 1.4 (TSQM-1.4 More than 90% of SMA patients were consistently satisfied over a median treatment duration of 10 months. Highest mean scores were observed in the dimensions 'side effects,' 'global satisfaction,' and 'effectiveness' (93.5 ± 14.8 Most patients were satisfied with nusinersen treatment effectiveness. Less severely affected patients indicated higher satisfaction. The TSQM-1.4

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Nusinersen was the first approved disease-modifying therapy for all 5q-spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients regardless of age or disease severity. Its efficacy in adults has recently been demonstrated in a large cohort by motor outcome measures, which were only partially suitable to detect changes in very mildly or severely affected patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) have been suggested as a valuable addition. Here, we aimed to assess treatment satisfaction and investigate whether it may be a useful PRO to monitor SMA patients.
METHODS METHODS
We enrolled 91 mainly adult 5q-SMA patients treated with nusinersen in a national, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study. 21 patients underwent longitudinal follow up. Patients' satisfaction with treatment in four dimensions (global, effectiveness, convenience, side effects) was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication German version 1.4 (TSQM-1.4
RESULTS RESULTS
More than 90% of SMA patients were consistently satisfied over a median treatment duration of 10 months. Highest mean scores were observed in the dimensions 'side effects,' 'global satisfaction,' and 'effectiveness' (93.5 ± 14.8
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Most patients were satisfied with nusinersen treatment effectiveness. Less severely affected patients indicated higher satisfaction. The TSQM-1.4

Identifiants

pubmed: 33747131
doi: 10.1177/1756286421998902
pii: 10.1177_1756286421998902
pmc: PMC7940734
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1756286421998902

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement: AO received honoraria as a speaker/consultant from the German Neuromuscular Society ‘Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Muskelkranke’ (DGM e.V.), and Biogen GmbH. GR and MK received travel cost compensations from Biogen GmbH. CDW received honoraria and travel expenses from Biogen as an advisory board member and for lectures and as a consultant from Roche. BS received travel reimbursement and speaker honoraria from Biogen GmbH. IC received honoraria as speaker/consultant from Biogen GmbH. RG received honoraria as speaker/consultant from Biogen GmbH and Roche, and received research support from Biogen GmbH. MF reports non-financial support from Biogen outside the submitted work. LHM and CB report no disclosures. AH received personal fees and non-financial support from Biogen GmbH and from Destin, during the conduct of the study; grants from Helmholtz Foundation, BMBF, Innovationsausschuss des G-BA, DGM e.V., Schilling-Stiftung, outside the submitted work. MD received honoraria for advisory activities, talks and travel fees from Biogen GmbH, Roche and DGM e.V. PL received support for symposium organization from Biogen GmbH during the conduct of the study; and speaker honoraria from Desitin, BIAL, and AbbVie, and fees for advisory activities from Novartis, outside of the submitted work. ACL reports no disclosures. TH received honoraria as speaker/consultant from Biogen GmbH, Roche, Novartis, CSL Behring, Pfizer, Akcea, Sanofi-Aventis, and research support from Biogen GmbH and Sanofi-Aventis. OSK received honoraria as a speaker/consultant and/or funding for travel expenses from DGM e.V., Novartis, Biogen GmbH, the Jain Foundation and Biermann Verlag GmbH, and research support from the DGM e.V. SP received honoraria as speaker/consultant from Biogen GmbH, Roche, Novartis, Teva, Cytokinetics Inc., Desitin; and grants from DGM e.V, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, German Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development, EU Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disease Research.

Références

Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1889-97
pubmed: 23077013
J Child Neurol. 2011 Dec;26(12):1499-507
pubmed: 21940700
J Neurol Sci. 1999 Oct 31;169(1-2):13-21
pubmed: 10540002
Neuromuscul Disord. 2019 Oct;29(10):742-746
pubmed: 31604650
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1723-1732
pubmed: 29091570
J Neurol. 2020 Aug;267(8):2398-2407
pubmed: 32361837
Neurology. 2019 May 21;92(21):e2492-e2506
pubmed: 31019106
J Med Chem. 2018 Aug 09;61(15):6501-6517
pubmed: 30044619
QRC Advis. 1996 Nov;13(1):1-7
pubmed: 10162025
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 21;14(1):18
pubmed: 30665421
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3406
pubmed: 32099042
Neuroradiology. 2019 May;61(5):565-574
pubmed: 30868184
J Neurol. 2021 Mar;268(3):950-962
pubmed: 33029682
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;62(3):743-66
pubmed: 26022173
Value Health. 2005 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 1:S9-S24
pubmed: 16336491
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 15;378(7):625-635
pubmed: 29443664
Gut. 2004 May;53 Suppl 4:iv40-4
pubmed: 15082613
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199657
pubmed: 29944707
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;6(4):453-465
pubmed: 31594243
Mult Scler. 2005 Jun;11(3):306-9
pubmed: 15957512
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Jan 20;13:1756286419887616
pubmed: 32010224
Neuromuscul Disord. 2019 Nov;29(11):842-856
pubmed: 31704158
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):317-325
pubmed: 32199097
Lancet. 2008 Jun 21;371(9630):2120-33
pubmed: 18572081
Drugs. 2019 Jul;79(11):1255-1262
pubmed: 31270752
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Feb 26;2:12
pubmed: 14987333
Hum Genet. 2006 May;119(4):422-8
pubmed: 16508748
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):11-23
pubmed: 26889874
BMC Neurol. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):39
pubmed: 28231823
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(4):604-613
pubmed: 27364322
Diabetes Care. 1996 Oct;19(10):1153-64
pubmed: 8886566
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2019 May;23(3):347-356
pubmed: 30962132
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):137-44
pubmed: 22145124
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Jan 6;57:81-105
pubmed: 27732800
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Source Code Biol Med. 2008 Dec 16;3:17
pubmed: 19087314
Neurol Sci. 2019 Feb;40(2):327-332
pubmed: 30430317
BMC Neurol. 2019 Sep 7;19(1):222
pubmed: 31493784
J Med Chem. 2018 Dec 27;61(24):11021-11036
pubmed: 30407821
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Mar 5;13:1756286420907803
pubmed: 32180828
Ann Neurol. 2017 Mar;81(3):355-368
pubmed: 28026041
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2018 Feb 2;24(2):92-95
pubmed: 29469643
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Apr;64(2):380-90
pubmed: 8871422
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2020;7(1):1-13
pubmed: 31707373
Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1060-70
pubmed: 22922434
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Jun;53(6):549-53
pubmed: 10880772
J Neurol. 2019 Jan;266(1):183-194
pubmed: 30460449
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Jun;55(6):869-874
pubmed: 27701745
Int J MS Care. 2014 Summer;16(2):68-75
pubmed: 25061430

Auteurs

Alma Osmanovic (A)

Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, Hannover 30625, Germany.

Gresa Ranxha (G)

Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Mareike Kumpe (M)

Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Claudia D Wurster (CD)

Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Benjamin Stolte (B)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Isabell Cordts (I)

Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.

René Günther (R)

Department of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.

Maren Freigang (M)

Department of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.

Lars H Müschen (LH)

Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Camilla Binz (C)

Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Andreas Hermann (A)

Translational Neurodegeneration Section 'Albrecht-Kossel,' Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Marcus Deschauer (M)

Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Paul Lingor (P)

Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Albert C Ludolph (AC)

Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Tim Hagenacker (T)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Olivia Schreiber-Katz (O)

Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Susanne Petri (S)

Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Classifications MeSH