Prospective observational study evaluating acute and delayed treatment related toxicities of prophylactic extended field volumetric modulated arc therapy with concurrent cisplatin in cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis.
Chronic toxicity
Grade 2 and above Acute G.I or GU Toxicity
Improved therapeutic Index
Pelvic lymph node positive locally advanced cervical cancer
Prophylactic para aortic extended field SIB-VMAT
Journal
Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2405-6324
Titre abrégé: Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101762366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
30
10
2020
revised:
10
02
2021
accepted:
15
02
2021
entrez:
22
3
2021
pubmed:
23
3
2021
medline:
23
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the treatment related acute and delayed toxicities of extended field Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with concurrent chemotherapy in patients of locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph nodes. From 2014 to 2016, 15 patients of locally advanced cervical cancer with Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) positive pelvic lymph nodes were treated with extended field Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-VMAT 45 Gy/55 Gy/25#/5weeks and concurrent cisplatin. Acute toxicities were documented according to common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4 (CTCAE v.4). Dose volume parameters and patient characteristics were analyzed for association with toxicities. Median age of patients at diagnosis was 48 years. 40% (6 patients) were stage IIB & 60% (9 patients) were stage IIIB. Median number of involved pelvic lymph nodes was 2 (range, 1-4), commonest location was external iliac lymph node region (86%). Median number of concurrent chemotherapy cycles received was five. Treatment was well tolerated and there were no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Commonest acute toxicities observed were vomiting (≥grade2 -13.3%) followed by & nausea (grade ≥ 2 in 6%) and were associated with volume of bowel bag receiving 45 Gy. Constitutional symptoms (≥grade 2) were observed in 6% patients and had no dosimetric associations. At a median follow up of 43 months, delayed ≥ grade1, 2, 3 toxicity were observed in 80%, 0%, and 0% respectively with diarrhea being the commonest. Prophylactic para aortic extended field VMAT with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer is well tolerated with acceptable acute toxicity profile. Significant grade 3 acute/delayed toxicities were not observed in this cohort of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33748442
doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.02.009
pii: S2405-6324(21)00014-7
pmc: PMC7970137
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
48-56Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jan;23(1):119-25
pubmed: 23262521
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr;76(5):1396-403
pubmed: 19581056
J Cancer Res Ther. 2013 Oct-Dec;9(4):574-82
pubmed: 24518699
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):109.e1-6
pubmed: 19398095
J Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):14-21
pubmed: 24459576
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1137-43
pubmed: 10202164
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Sep 1;51(1):261-6
pubmed: 11516876
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):1170-6
pubmed: 16730136
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Aug 1;56(5):1354-60
pubmed: 12873680
Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):781-6
pubmed: 11564482
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 1;109(3):688-700
pubmed: 33068689
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 20;13(1):223
pubmed: 30453993
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Apr;97(1):126-35
pubmed: 15790448
IARC Sci Publ. 1998;(145):135-73
pubmed: 10194635
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Dec 1;42(5):1015-23
pubmed: 9869224
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):383-389
pubmed: 27102843
Radiother Oncol. 2019 May;134:185-190
pubmed: 31005214
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Sep 1;87(1):106-10
pubmed: 23849691
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007 Sep;19(7):542-50
pubmed: 17624745
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 26;10:CD012301
pubmed: 30362204
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Apr 1;52(5):1330-7
pubmed: 11955746
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Aug;102(2):182-8
pubmed: 16516281
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1091-8
pubmed: 25303889
Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1781-8
pubmed: 12655536
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):441-446
pubmed: 27350396
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1978 Sep-Oct;4(9-10):795-9
pubmed: 711548
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 May 1;68(1):166-71
pubmed: 17321070
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Dec 1;63(5):1604-12
pubmed: 16198509
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;49(2):146-152
pubmed: 30452664
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul - Aug;9(4):e394-e399
pubmed: 30802616
Cancer. 1980 Apr 15;45(8):2220-4
pubmed: 7370963
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Nov;67(2):203-7
pubmed: 9367709