Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy.
Journal
Advances in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2452-1094
Titre abrégé: Adv Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101677247
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
19
10
2020
revised:
15
12
2020
accepted:
23
12
2020
entrez:
22
3
2021
pubmed:
23
3
2021
medline:
23
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The machine learning-based automated treatment planning (MLAP) tool has been developed and evaluated for breast radiation therapy planning at our institution. We implemented MLAP for patient treatment and assessed our clinical experience for its performance. A total of 102 patients of breast or chest wall treatment plans were prospectively evaluated with institutional review board approval. A human planner executed MLAP to create an auto-plan via automation of fluence maps generation. If judged necessary, a planner further fine-tuned the fluence maps to reach a final plan. Planners recorded the time required for auto-planning and manual modification. Target (ie, breast or chest wall and nodes) coverage and dose homogeneity were compared between the auto-plan and final plan. Cases without nodes (n = 71) showed negligible (<1%) differences for target coverage and dose homogeneity between the auto-plan and final plan. Cases with nodes (n = 31) also showed negligible difference for target coverage. However, mean ± standard deviation of volume receiving 105% of the prescribed dose and maximum dose were reduced from 43.0% ± 26.3% to 39.4% ± 23.7% and 119.7% ± 9.5% to 114.4% ± 8.8% from auto-plan to final plan, respectively, all with The MLAP tool has been successfully implemented for routine clinical practice and has significantly improved planning efficiency. Clinical experience indicates that auto-plans are sufficient for target coverage, but improvement is warranted to reduce high dose volume for cases with nodal irradiation. This study demonstrates the clinical implementation of auto-planning for patient treatment and the significant importance of integrating human experience and feedback to improve MLAP for better clinical translation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33748540
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100656
pii: S2452-1094(21)00014-2
pmc: PMC7966969
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100656Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):575-83
pubmed: 21237584
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 07;9:750
pubmed: 31440474
Phys Med. 2016 Oct 28;:
pubmed: 28029580
Med Dosim. 2020 Spring;45(1):102-107
pubmed: 31956001
J Med Phys. 2013 Jul;38(3):115-9
pubmed: 24049317
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):918-24
pubmed: 17889273
Med Dosim. 2007 Spring;32(1):7-12
pubmed: 17317529
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 1;90(3):688-95
pubmed: 25160607
Med Dosim. 2016 Autumn;41(3):253-7
pubmed: 27545009
Radiother Oncol. 1998 Dec;49(3):255-65
pubmed: 10075258
J Med Phys. 2018 Apr-Jun;43(2):79-84
pubmed: 29962684
Strahlenther Onkol. 2002 Jan;178(1):18-24
pubmed: 11977387
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 May 15;21(1):193-203
pubmed: 2032888
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 15;93(4):845-53
pubmed: 26530753
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Mar 17;15(1):67
pubmed: 32178694
Med Phys. 2008 Jun;35(6):2253-8
pubmed: 18649455
J Radiat Res. 2013 Jan;54(1):157-65
pubmed: 22859565
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 19;13(10):e0205770
pubmed: 30339705
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3767-3775
pubmed: 31077593
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Aug 1;68(5):1505-11
pubmed: 17674981
Med Dosim. 1998 Spring;23(1):5-10
pubmed: 9586711