How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment.
Assessment
Community readiness
Community-based health promotion
Key informants
Validity
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Mar 2021
09 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
16
09
2020
accepted:
23
02
2021
entrez:
22
3
2021
pubmed:
23
3
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Communities are important settings for health promotion and prevention. The community readiness assessment offers a structured approach to assess resources and opportunities to tackle a health problem within a community. The assessment relies on semi-structured interviews with key informants from the communities. A number of 4-6 key informant interviews are recommended in the literature. However, it is unclear whether this is sufficient to obtain a valid representation of the respective community. This study analysed whether increasing the number of key informants from 4-6 to 12-15 alters the results of the community readiness assessment. A total of 55 community readiness interviews were carried out in 4 communities. Overall, the community readiness scores showed little variation after having interviewed 10 key informants in a community. However, even after completing 10 interviews in a community, key informants were still able to identify up to 6 new information items regarding community efforts for physical activity promotion among the elderly, contact and communication channel for informing or approaching the target group, or barriers to participation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33750436
doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9
pii: 10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9
pmc: PMC7941941
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
85Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 01EL1822A
Références
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2008;6(4):173-87
pubmed: 19382818
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Mar 24;12(4):3453-68
pubmed: 25811769
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 01;16:99
pubmed: 26833206
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):1420
pubmed: 31666042
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 20;13:1205
pubmed: 24359213
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Mar;27(1):59-67
pubmed: 30319018
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608
pubmed: 27670770
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):575-584
pubmed: 30972905
J Community Psychol. 2017 May;45(4):486-499
pubmed: 28458405
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Nov;82(11):868-876
pubmed: 32344445
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 28;19(1):646
pubmed: 31138180
Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297-322
pubmed: 16533119
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):114-122
pubmed: 31330011
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
pubmed: 20204937
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 May;23(3):262-71
pubmed: 25429845
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 06;15(3):
pubmed: 29509675