Canadian Rhinology Working Group consensus statement: biologic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis.
Biologics
Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis
Type 2 inflammation
Journal
Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
ISSN: 1916-0216
Titre abrégé: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101479544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Mar 2021
09 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
14
10
2020
accepted:
11
01
2021
entrez:
22
3
2021
pubmed:
23
3
2021
medline:
6
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent evidence suggests that biologic therapy with targeted activity within the Type 2 inflammatory pathway can improve the clinical signs and symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). There remains a population in CRSwNP that despite medical therapy and endoscopic sinus surgery have persistent signs and symptoms of disease. Therefore, biologics, monoclonal antibody agents, could be beneficial therapeutic treatments for these patients. There have been eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trails performed for CRSwNP targeted components of the Type 2 inflammatory pathway, notably interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13, IL-5R, IL-33, and immunoglobulin (Ig)E. However, there are no formal recommendations for the optimal use of biologics in managing Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) within the Canadian health care environment. A Delphi Method process was utilized involving three rounds of questionnaires in which the first two were completed individually online and the third was discussed on a virtual platform with all the panelists. 17 fellowship trained rhinologists across Canada evaluated the 28 original statements on a scale of 1-10 and provided comments. A rating within 1-3 indicated disagreement, 8-10 demonstrated agreement and 4-7 represented being neutral towards a statement. All ratings were quantitively reviewed by mean, median, mode, range and standard deviation. Consensus was defined by removing the highest and lowest of the scores and using the "3 point relaxed system". After three rounds, a total of 11 statements achieved consensus. This white paper only contains the final agreed upon statements and clear rationale and support for the statements regarding the use of biologics in patients with CRS. This white paper provides guidance to Canadian physicians on the use of biologic therapy for the management of patients with CRS, but the medical and surgical regimen should ultimately be individualized to the patient. As more biologics become available and additional trials are published we will provide updated versions of this white paper every few years.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence suggests that biologic therapy with targeted activity within the Type 2 inflammatory pathway can improve the clinical signs and symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). There remains a population in CRSwNP that despite medical therapy and endoscopic sinus surgery have persistent signs and symptoms of disease. Therefore, biologics, monoclonal antibody agents, could be beneficial therapeutic treatments for these patients. There have been eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trails performed for CRSwNP targeted components of the Type 2 inflammatory pathway, notably interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13, IL-5R, IL-33, and immunoglobulin (Ig)E. However, there are no formal recommendations for the optimal use of biologics in managing Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) within the Canadian health care environment.
METHODS
METHODS
A Delphi Method process was utilized involving three rounds of questionnaires in which the first two were completed individually online and the third was discussed on a virtual platform with all the panelists. 17 fellowship trained rhinologists across Canada evaluated the 28 original statements on a scale of 1-10 and provided comments. A rating within 1-3 indicated disagreement, 8-10 demonstrated agreement and 4-7 represented being neutral towards a statement. All ratings were quantitively reviewed by mean, median, mode, range and standard deviation. Consensus was defined by removing the highest and lowest of the scores and using the "3 point relaxed system".
RESULTS
RESULTS
After three rounds, a total of 11 statements achieved consensus. This white paper only contains the final agreed upon statements and clear rationale and support for the statements regarding the use of biologics in patients with CRS.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This white paper provides guidance to Canadian physicians on the use of biologic therapy for the management of patients with CRS, but the medical and surgical regimen should ultimately be individualized to the patient. As more biologics become available and additional trials are published we will provide updated versions of this white paper every few years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33750471
doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00493-2
pii: 10.1186/s40463-021-00493-2
pmc: PMC7945300
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biological Products
0
Types de publication
Consensus Development Conference
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15Références
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Apr;9(4):402-408
pubmed: 30570840
Clin Transl Allergy. 2020 Jan 3;10:1
pubmed: 31908763
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul 1;144(7):605-612
pubmed: 29879268
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Feb;10(2):165-174
pubmed: 31869863
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Oct;140(4):1024-1031.e14
pubmed: 28687232
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb;82(2):377-388
pubmed: 31374300
BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):376-80
pubmed: 7640549
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Nov;118(5):1133-41
pubmed: 17088140
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jan;128(1):31-36
pubmed: 28688189
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jan;131(1):110-6.e1
pubmed: 23021878
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):44-7
pubmed: 26867529
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2011 Feb 10;7(1):2
pubmed: 21310056
JAMA. 2016 Feb 2;315(5):469-79
pubmed: 26836729
Respir Med. 2017 Sep;130:55-60
pubmed: 29206634
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Jun 1;:
pubmed: 29856520
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 Nov;2(6):437-43
pubmed: 22696495
Rhinology. 2020 Feb 1;58(1):10-17
pubmed: 31671432
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Nov;128(5):989-95.e1-8
pubmed: 21958585
Rhinology. 2020 Feb 20;58(Suppl S29):1-464
pubmed: 32077450
Rhinology. 2010 Sep;48(3):318-24
pubmed: 21038023
Laryngoscope. 2009 Dec;119(12):2459-65
pubmed: 19780032
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):E26-E33
pubmed: 32243622
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 Sep;32(5):412-423
pubmed: 30021447
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Sep;3(9):748-54
pubmed: 23704081