Penile implant infection part 3: the changing spectrum of treatment.
Journal
International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
26
09
2020
accepted:
18
11
2020
revised:
12
10
2020
medline:
15
9
2023
pubmed:
23
3
2021
entrez:
22
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Penile prosthesis infection remains a rare but devastating complication of implantation. Historically, management of device infection was always extirpation. While certainly effective, device removal leaves an unhappy patient with a shortened penis. In this last part of a three-part series on the topic of penile prosthesis infection, we seek to highlight new and emerging ideas of infection management which have allowed surgeons the option of preserving the implanted status in select patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33750937
doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00382-8
pii: 10.1038/s41443-020-00382-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
512-518Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Holloway FB, Farah RN. Intermediate term assessment of the reliability, function and patient satisfaction with the AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1997;157:1687–91.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64835-3
pubmed: 9112506
Köhler TS, Wen L, Wilson SK. Penile implant device infection part 1: fact or fiction. Int J Impot Res. 2020. online ahead of print.
Mulcahy JJ, Köhler TS, Wen L, Wilson SK. Penile implant infections part 2: infection retardant coatings have changed the game. Int J Impot Res. 2020. online ahead of print.
Wilson SK, Costerton W. Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: a review. J Sex Med. 2012;9:44–53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02428.x
pubmed: 21951338
Wolter CE, Hellstrom WJ. The hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prosthesis: 1-year experience. J Sex Med. 2004;1:221–4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.04032.x
pubmed: 16429621
Kava BR, Kanagarajah P, Ayyathurai P. Contemporary revision penile prosthesis surgery is not associated with a high risk of implant colonization or infection: a single-surgeon series. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1540–6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02222.x
pubmed: 21366878
Mulcahy JJ. Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2010;2:69–75.
doi: 10.1177/1756287210370330
pubmed: 21789084
pmcid: 3126071
Kim JC, Lunati FP, Khan SA, Waltzer WC. T-tube drainage of infected penile corporeal chambers. Urology. 1995;45:514–5.
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80026-0
pubmed: 7879342
Maatman TJ, Montague DK. Intracorporeal drainage after removal of infected penile prostheses. Urology. 1984;23:184–5.
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90019-0
pubmed: 6695489
Lopategui DM, Balise RR, Bouzoubaa LA, Wilson SK, Kava BR. The impact of immediate salvage surgery on corporeal length preservation in patients presenting with penile implant infections. J Urol. 2018;200:171–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.082
pubmed: 29408215
Canguven O, Talib RA, Campbell J, De Young L, El Ansari W, Al-Ansari A. Is the daily use of vacuum erection device for a month before penile prosthesis implantation beneficial? a randomized controlled trial. Andrology. 2017;5:103–6.
doi: 10.1111/andr.12258
pubmed: 27654466
Köhler TK, Gupta NK, Wilson SK. Wilson’s pearls perils and pitfalls of penile prosthesis surgery. Fort Smith AR: Calvert McBride; 2018.
Wilson SK, Simhan J Gross M. Cylinder insertion into scarred corporal bodies: prosthetic urology’s most difficult challenge. Int J Impot Res. 2020. online ahead of print.
Caire AA, Boonjindasup A, Hellstrom WJ. Does a replacement or revision of an inflatable penile prosthesis lead to decreased patient satisfaction? Int J Impot Res. 2011;23:39–42.
doi: 10.1038/ijir.2011.1
pubmed: 21307871
Silverstein AD, Henry GD, Evans B, Pasmore M, Simmons CJ, Donatucci CF. Biofilm formation on clinically noninfected penile prostheses. J Urol. 2006;176:1008–11.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.034
pubmed: 16890680
Darouiche RO, Bell AJ, Boone TB, Brock G, Broderick GA, Burnett AL, et al. North American consensus document on infection of penile prostheses. Urology. 2013;82:937–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.048
pubmed: 23958508
Olds C, Spataro E, Li K, Kandathil C, Most SP. Postoperative antibiotic use among patients undergoing functional facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21:491–7.
doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.1027
pubmed: 31647506
pmcid: 6813590
Gupta NK, Sulaver R, Welliver C, Kottwitz M, Frederick L, Dynda D, et al. Scrotoplasty at time of penile implant is at high risk for dehiscence in diabetics. Sex Med. 2019;4:602–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.02.001
Henry GD, Price G, Pryor M, Greenfield J, Jones L, Perito P, et al. Observation of local clinical penile prostheses infections instead of immediate salvage rescue/removal: multicenter study with surprising results; Abstract: PD20-04. J Urol. 2014;191 Supplement: E612–3.
Habous M, Farag M, Williamson B, Laban O, Mahmoud S, Abdelwahab O, et al. Conservative therapy is effective option in patients with localized infection after penile implant surgery. Sex Med. 2016;1:972–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.064
Cotta BH, Butcher M, Welliver C, McVary K, Köhler T. Two fungal infections of inflatable penile prostheses in diabetics. Sex Med. 2015;4:339.
doi: 10.1002/sm2.86
Rezaee ME, Towe M, Osman MM, Huynh LM, El-Khatib FM, Andrianne R, et al. Multicenter investigation of the micro-organisms involved in penile prosthesis infection: an analysis of the efficacy of the AUA and EAU guidelines for penile prosthesis prophylaxis. J Sex Med. 2017;14:455–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.01.007
Mulcahy JJ. Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol. 2000;163:481–2.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67906-2
pubmed: 10647660
Brant MD, Ludlow JK, Mulcahy JJ. The prosthesis salvage operation: immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1996;155:155–7.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66580-7
pubmed: 7490819
Knoll LD. Penile prosthetic infection: management by delayed and immediate salvage techniques. Urology. 1998;52:287–90.
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00187-3
pubmed: 9697796
Bryan DE, Mulcahy JJ, Simmons GR. Salvage procedure for infected noneroded artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol. 2002;168:2464–6.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64169-9
pubmed: 12441941
Pan S, Rodriguez D, Thirumavalavan N, Gross MS, Eid JF, Mulcahy J, et al. The use of antiseptic solutions in the prevention and management of penile prosthesis infections: a review of the cytotoxic and microbiological effects of common irrigation solutions. J Sex Med. 2019;16:781–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.271
pubmed: 31146926
Manka MG, Yang D, Andrews J, Chalmers B, Hebert K, Köhler TS, Trost L. Intraoperative use of Betadine irrigation is associalted with 9-fold increased liklihood of penile prosthesis infection: results from a retrospective case controled study. J Sex Med. 2020;8:422–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.05.010
Zargaroff S, Sharma V, Berhanu D, Pearl JA, Meeks JJ, Dupree JM, et al. National trends in the treatment of penile prosthesis infections by explantation alone vs. immediate salvage and reimplantation. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1078–85.
doi: 10.1111/jsm.12446
pubmed: 24628707
Gross MS, Phillips EA, Balenm A, Eid JF, Yang C, Simon R, et al. The malleable implant salvage technique: infection outcomes after mulcahy salvage procedure and replacement of infected inflatable penile prosthesis with malleable prosthesis. J Urol. 2016;195:694–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.091
pubmed: 26343986
Parsons CL, Stein PC, Dobke MK, Virden CP, Frank DH. Diagnosis and therapy of subclinically infected prostheses. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:504–6.
pubmed: 8211603
Lujan S, Rogel R, Broseta E, Boronat F. local treatment of penile prosthesis infection as alternative to immediate salvage surgery. Sex Med. 2016;4:e255–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2016.06.002
pubmed: 27484916
pmcid: 5121535
Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR, Carson CC, Silverstein A, Cleves MA, et al. Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study. J Urol. 2004;172:153–6.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132141.48587.f1
pubmed: 15201759
Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR, Carson CC, Wiygul J, Tornehi C, et al. Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: a multicenter study. J Urol. 2005;173:89–92.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146717.62215.6f
pubmed: 15592039
Kohler TS, Modder JK, Dupree JM, Bush NC, McVary KT. Malleable implant substitution for the management of penile prosthesis pump erosion: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1474–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01236.x
pubmed: 19453933