Physiological Responses to In-Bed Cycle Ergometry Treatment in Intensive Care Unit Patients with External Ventricular Drainage.
Early mobility
Ergometry
External ventricular drain
Neurocritical care
Recovery
Supine cycling
Journal
Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
01
07
2020
accepted:
30
01
2021
pubmed:
23
3
2021
medline:
4
3
2022
entrez:
22
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evidence suggests that early physical activity can be accomplished safely in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU); however, many NCCU patients are often maintained in a state of inactivity due to impaired consciousness, sensorimotor deficits, and concerns for intracranial pressure elevation or cerebral hypoperfusion in the setting of autoregulatory failure. Structured in-bed mobility interventions have been proposed to prevent sequelae of complete immobility in such patients, yet the feasibility and safety of these interventions is unknown. We studied neurological and hemodynamic changes before and after cycle ergometry (CE) in a subset of NCCU patients with external ventricular drains (EVDs). Patients admitted to the NCCU who had an EVD placed for cerebrospinal fluid drainage and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring underwent supine CE therapy with passive and active cycling settings. Neurologic status, ICP and hemodynamic parameters were monitored before and after each CE session. Twenty-seven patients successfully underwent in-bed CE in the NCCU. No clinically significant changes were recorded in neurologic or in physiological parameters before or after CE. There were no device dislodgements or other adverse effects requiring cessation of a CE session. These data suggest that supine CE in a heterogeneous cohort of neurocritical care patients with EVDs is safe and tolerable. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy and optimal dose and timing of supine CE in neurocritical care patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33751389
doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01204-5
pii: 10.1007/s12028-021-01204-5
pmc: PMC7983346
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
707-713Informations de copyright
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.
Références
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):865-73
pubmed: 25517476
Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2013 Jun;24(2):12-7
pubmed: 23801900
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2013 Jan-Mar;36(1):50-5
pubmed: 23221441
J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1419.e1-5
pubmed: 26318234
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;97(5):e37-e41
pubmed: 29095167
J Neurosci Nurs. 2017 Apr;49(2):102-107
pubmed: 28230563
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Aug;27(1):115-119
pubmed: 28243999
J Bras Pneumol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):134-139
pubmed: 28538781
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Aug;31(1):88-96
pubmed: 30659467
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jun;99(6):1220-1225
pubmed: 29580936
Phys Ther. 2017 Jun 1;97(6):593-602
pubmed: 28379571
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 09;8(9):e74182
pubmed: 24040200
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1379-88
pubmed: 22462507
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):3-14
pubmed: 30339549
Crit Care Clin. 2017 Apr;33(2):225-243
pubmed: 28284292
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):157
pubmed: 20497606
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Apr;30(2):414-420
pubmed: 30357597
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Dec;25(3):434-439
pubmed: 27216931
Aust Crit Care. 2020 May;33(3):244-249
pubmed: 32349888
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):370-374
pubmed: 29747562
Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2499-505
pubmed: 19623052
J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):535.e9-15
pubmed: 23499419