Electromagnetic field and TGF-β enhance the compensatory plasticity after sensory nerve injury in cockroach Periplaneta americana.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 03 2021
Historique:
received: 05 12 2020
accepted: 01 03 2021
entrez: 23 3 2021
pubmed: 24 3 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recovery of function after sensory nerves injury involves compensatory plasticity, which can be observed in invertebrates. The aim of the study was the evaluation of compensatory plasticity in the cockroach (Periplaneta americana) nervous system after the sensory nerve injury and assessment of the effect of electromagnetic field exposure (EMF, 50 Hz, 7 mT) and TGF-β on this process. The bioelectrical activities of nerves (pre-and post-synaptic parts of the sensory path) were recorded under wind stimulation of the cerci before and after right cercus ablation and in insects exposed to EMF and treated with TGF-β. Ablation of the right cercus caused an increase of activity of the left presynaptic part of the sensory path. Exposure to EMF and TGF-β induced an increase of activity in both parts of the sensory path. This suggests strengthening effects of EMF and TGF-β on the insect ability to recognize stimuli after one cercus ablation. Data from locomotor tests proved electrophysiological results. The takeover of the function of one cercus by the second one proves the existence of compensatory plasticity in the cockroach escape system, which makes it a good model for studying compensatory plasticity. We recommend further research on EMF as a useful factor in neurorehabilitation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33753758
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85341-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-85341-z
pmc: PMC7985317
doi:

Substances chimiques

Transforming Growth Factor beta 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6582

Références

J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 19;23(33):10495-502
pubmed: 14627633
J Neurobiol. 2000 Mar;42(4):394-409
pubmed: 10699978
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):265-79
pubmed: 11249175
J Exp Biol. 2007 Dec;210(Pt 24):4411-7
pubmed: 18055629
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 18;6:21774
pubmed: 26887777
Nat Methods. 2014 Jul;11(7):743-8
pubmed: 24880877
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Dec 7;2:2398212818818068
pubmed: 32166171
Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(2):170-5
pubmed: 26192151
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1015:1-15
pubmed: 29080018
Front Physiol. 2013 Aug 23;3:367
pubmed: 23986706
Exp Neurol. 2010 Nov;226(1):173-82
pubmed: 20816824
Med Pr. 2015;66(2):185-97
pubmed: 26294311
J Neurobiol. 2001 Oct;49(1):9-28
pubmed: 11536194
Brain Res. 2014 May 20;1564:1-8
pubmed: 24727530
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 12;8:340
pubmed: 24971056
Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:2450327
pubmed: 28512472
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:161-95
pubmed: 19575668
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Nov;2(11):791-805
pubmed: 11715056
Front Physiol. 2013 Aug 23;4:226
pubmed: 23986720
Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Aug;95(8):1185-1193
pubmed: 30822251
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2011 Feb;197(2):181-92
pubmed: 20972796
Trends Neurosci. 2013 Aug;36(8):471-9
pubmed: 23706151
Neuron. 2009 Jul 30;63(2):154-70
pubmed: 19640475
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 7;282(1812):20151198
pubmed: 26224706
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974 Jan 22;185(1078):83-103
pubmed: 4149053
Trends Neurosci. 2010 Jan;33(1):17-26
pubmed: 19889466
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):
pubmed: 28130362
J Toxicol. 2012;2012:143740
pubmed: 22666245
Front Physiol. 2013 Aug 23;4:48
pubmed: 23986709
J Biochem. 2016 Aug;160(2):77-85
pubmed: 27318359
Cell Transplant. 2017 Mar 13;26(3):381-394
pubmed: 27983926
Int J Neurosci. 2016 Aug;126(8):739-48
pubmed: 26010211
Bioelectromagnetics. 2017 Jul;38(5):386-396
pubmed: 28430370
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Feb;5(1):28-35
pubmed: 7773002
J Cell Physiol. 2008 Apr;215(1):129-39
pubmed: 17941084
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2019 Jul;158:101-111
pubmed: 31378344
J Insect Physiol. 2006 Oct;52(10):1083-92
pubmed: 17028016
J Vis Exp. 2013 Nov 04;(81):e50584
pubmed: 24300738

Auteurs

Milena Jankowska (M)

Department of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruń, Poland.

Angelika Klimek (A)

Department of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruń, Poland.

Chiara Valsecchi (C)

Federal University of Pampa, Campus Alegrete, Alegrete, RS, Brazil.

Maria Stankiewicz (M)

Department of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruń, Poland.

Joanna Wyszkowska (J)

Department of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruń, Poland. jwyszk@umk.pl.

Justyna Rogalska (J)

Department of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruń, Poland.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH