Cardiothoracic imaging findings of Proteus syndrome.
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Diagnostic Imaging
/ methods
Female
Heart Defects, Congenital
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Lung
/ abnormalities
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Mediastinum
/ abnormalities
Middle Aged
Proteus Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Thoracic Wall
/ abnormalities
Thorax
/ abnormalities
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 03 2021
22 03 2021
Historique:
received:
25
11
2020
accepted:
08
03
2021
entrez:
23
3
2021
pubmed:
24
3
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this work, we sought to delineate the prevalence of cardiothoracic imaging findings of Proteus syndrome in a large cohort at our institution. Of 53 individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of Proteus syndrome at our institution from 10/2001 to 10/2019, 38 individuals (men, n = 23; average age = 24 years) underwent cardiothoracic imaging (routine chest CT, CT pulmonary angiography and/or cardiac MRI). All studies were retrospectively and independently reviewed by two fellowship-trained cardiothoracic readers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Differences between variables were analyzed via parametric and nonparametric tests based on the normality of the distribution. The cardiothoracic findings of Proteus syndrome were diverse, but several were much more common and included: scoliosis from bony overgrowth (94%), pulmonary venous dilation (62%), band-like areas of lung scarring (56%), and hyperlucent lung parenchyma (50%). In addition, of 20 individuals who underwent cardiac MRI, 9/20 (45%) had intramyocardial fat, mostly involving the endocardial surface of the left ventricular septal wall. There was no statistically significant difference among the functional cardiac parameters between individuals with and without intramyocardial fat. Only one individual with intramyocardial fat had mildly decreased function (LVEF = 53%), while all others had normal ejection fraction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33753828
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86029-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-86029-0
pmc: PMC7985501
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6577Références
Pediatr Dermatol. 2016 Sep;33(5):e306-10
pubmed: 27378680
J Pediatr. 1976 Dec;89(6):924-7
pubmed: 993918
Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2010 Apr;3(2):83-91
pubmed: 20401158
Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Jan;167A(1):103-10
pubmed: 25377688
Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;14(11):1151-7
pubmed: 16883308
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jan;61(1):215-21
pubmed: 19097213
J Formos Med Assoc. 2010 May;109(5):397-400
pubmed: 20497874
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):928-40
pubmed: 19770313
Am J Med Genet. 1999 Jun 11;84(5):389-95
pubmed: 10360391
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Dec;181(4):565-570
pubmed: 31692258
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov;17(6):1053-6
pubmed: 24381883
Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24(3):189-93
pubmed: 7936796
Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Jul;31(7):444-54
pubmed: 23700212
Am J Med Genet. 1993 Apr 15;46(2):145-8
pubmed: 8484400
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):1533-41
pubmed: 20172911
Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Apr;155A(4):865-9
pubmed: 21412980
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Dec;181(4):571-581
pubmed: 31490637
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Aug;145(2):249-54
pubmed: 3875220
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Oct 1;130A(2):111-22
pubmed: 15372514
J Assoc Physicians India. 2016 May;64(5):69-71S
pubmed: 27735155
Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42
pubmed: 11815441
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2004 May;29(3):222-30
pubmed: 15115498
Radiographics. 2010 Oct;30(6):1587-602
pubmed: 21071377
Radiographics. 2004 Jul-Aug;24(4):1051-68
pubmed: 15256628
J Anesth. 2006;20(1):26-9
pubmed: 16421672
Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2012 Jun;31(3):145-53
pubmed: 22413928
J Thorac Imaging. 2009 Feb;24(1):45-8
pubmed: 19242304
Radiology. 2005 Apr;235(1):43-9; discussion 49-50
pubmed: 15731371
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Mar 07;6:27
pubmed: 28401074