Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of the Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 25 05 2020
accepted: 07 03 2021
entrez: 23 3 2021
pubmed: 24 3 2021
medline: 14 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Compassionate care is the sensitivity shown by health care providers to understand another person's suffering and a willingness to help and to promote the well being of that person. Although monitoring of compassionate care is key to ensuring patient-centered care, there is no validated tool in the Ethiopian context that can be applied to measure compassionate care. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the structural validity and reliability of the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale® (SCCCS) in the Ethiopian context. The structural validity and reliability of the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale® were investigated in a sample of 423 oncology patients in the adult Oncology department of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The internal consistency of the instrument was examined based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and the structural validity was evaluated by subjecting the items of the instrument to factor analysis. Statistical analysis was made using SPSS version 23.0. We have found that the Schwartz Center Compassionate Care scale is a two-factor structure (recognizing suffering and acting to relieve suffering). The scale has high overall scale reliability, which was 0.88, and subscale reliability of 0.84 for both recognizing suffering and acting to relieve suffering factors. The Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale has high internal consistency and acceptable structural validity value. The tool can be used to measure compassionate care practice in the Ethiopian context.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Compassionate care is the sensitivity shown by health care providers to understand another person's suffering and a willingness to help and to promote the well being of that person. Although monitoring of compassionate care is key to ensuring patient-centered care, there is no validated tool in the Ethiopian context that can be applied to measure compassionate care. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the structural validity and reliability of the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale® (SCCCS) in the Ethiopian context.
METHODS
The structural validity and reliability of the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale® were investigated in a sample of 423 oncology patients in the adult Oncology department of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The internal consistency of the instrument was examined based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and the structural validity was evaluated by subjecting the items of the instrument to factor analysis. Statistical analysis was made using SPSS version 23.0.
RESULTS
We have found that the Schwartz Center Compassionate Care scale is a two-factor structure (recognizing suffering and acting to relieve suffering). The scale has high overall scale reliability, which was 0.88, and subscale reliability of 0.84 for both recognizing suffering and acting to relieve suffering factors.
CONCLUSIONS
The Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale has high internal consistency and acceptable structural validity value. The tool can be used to measure compassionate care practice in the Ethiopian context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33755691
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248848
pii: PONE-D-20-15638
pmc: PMC7987159
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Validation Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0248848

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Ann Fam Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;3(5):415-21
pubmed: 16189057
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1772-8
pubmed: 21900669
Health Commun. 2007;21(2):177-85
pubmed: 17523863
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Sep 13;17(1):108
pubmed: 30213263
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):371-9
pubmed: 10458256
J Patient Exp. 2014 Nov;1(2):6-15
pubmed: 28725803
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Aug;98(8):1005-10
pubmed: 25921380
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Jul;47:15-27
pubmed: 27267346

Auteurs

Merkeb Zeray (M)

Department of General Public Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Aksum University, Aksum, Ethiopia.

Damen Haile Mariam (DH)

Department of Health Service Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Zekariyas Sahile (Z)

Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.

Alemayehu Hailu (A)

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care Medicine, Bergen Center for Ethics and Priority Setting, The University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH