Cannabis lighting: Decreasing blue photon fraction increases yield but efficacy is more important for cost effective production of cannabinoids.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
26
01
2021
accepted:
09
03
2021
entrez:
23
3
2021
pubmed:
24
3
2021
medline:
14
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
LED technology facilitates a range of spectral quality, which can be used to optimize photosynthesis, plant shape and secondary metabolism. We conducted three studies to investigate the effect of blue photon fraction on yield and quality of medical hemp. Conditions were varied among studies to evaluate potential interactions with environment, but all environmental conditions other than the blue photon fraction were maintained constant among the five-chambers in each study. The photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD, 400 to 700 nm) was rigorously maintained at the set point among treatments in each study by raising the fixtures. The lowest fraction of blue photons was 4% from HPS, and increased to 9.8, 10.4, 16, and 20% from LEDs. There was a consistent, linear, 12% decrease in yield in each study as the fraction of blue photons increased from 4 to 20%. Dry flower yield ranged from 500 to 750 g m-2. This resulted in a photon conversion efficacy of 0.22 to 0.36 grams dry flower mass yield per mole of photons. Yield was higher at a PPFD of 900 than at 750 μmol m-2 s-1. There was no effect of spectral quality on CBD or THC concentration. CBD and THC were 8% and 0.3% at harvest in trials one and two, and 12% and 0.5% in trial three. The CBD/THC ratio was about 25 to 1 in all treatments and studies. The efficacy of the fixtures ranged from 1.7 (HPS) to 2.5 μmol per joule (white+red LED). Yield under the white+red LED fixture (10.4% blue) was 4.6% lower than the HPS on a per unit area basis, but was 27% higher on a per dollar of electricity basis. These findings suggest that fixture efficacy and initial cost of the fixture are more important for return on investment than spectral distribution at high photon flux.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33755709
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248988
pii: PONE-D-21-02856
pmc: PMC7987162
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cannabinoids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0248988Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
This research was funded by the Utah Agricultural Research Station with help from Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The commercial funding does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Apr 24;11:497
pubmed: 32391040
FEMS Yeast Res. 2017 Jun 1;17(4):
pubmed: 28582498
Plant Cell Environ. 1998;21:315-24
pubmed: 11543216
Plant Physiol. 2019 Aug;180(4):1877-1897
pubmed: 31138625
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Oct 10;212(1-3):158-63
pubmed: 21737218
Photochem Photobiol. 2001 Feb;73(2):199-207
pubmed: 11272735
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 May;70(Pt B):302-312
pubmed: 28202406
Plant Cell Environ. 2020 May;43(5):1259-1272
pubmed: 31990071
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 19;10(1):5219
pubmed: 31745087
Hortic Res. 2020 Mar 30;7:56
pubmed: 32257242
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Nov;22(11):917-929
pubmed: 28886910
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 24;10:495
pubmed: 31068957
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 08;10(10):e0138930
pubmed: 26448613
J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2000 Jan;125(1):86-92
pubmed: 11762389
J Am Chem Soc. 1965 Jul 20;87:3273-5
pubmed: 14324315
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 04;7:19
pubmed: 26870049
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2008 Oct;14(4):299-306
pubmed: 23572895
Nat Prod Rep. 2016 Nov 23;33(12):1357-1392
pubmed: 27722705
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 29;10:296
pubmed: 31001288
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 11;11:581156
pubmed: 33014004
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0163121
pubmed: 27706176
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0202386
pubmed: 30114282
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 06;9(6):e99010
pubmed: 24905835
HortScience. 1993 Dec;28(12):1197-200
pubmed: 11537894
Drug Test Anal. 2014 Jan-Feb;6(1-2):31-8
pubmed: 24115748
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;209:115-122
pubmed: 28039776
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 10;7:250
pubmed: 27014285
Bull Narc. 1978 Jan-Mar;30(1):67-8
pubmed: 248289
J Nat Prod. 2016 Feb 26;79(2):324-31
pubmed: 26836472
J Chromatogr A. 2020 Sep 13;1627:461414
pubmed: 32823112
Photochem Photobiol. 2014 May-Jun;90(3):574-84
pubmed: 24372324
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1974 Jun;26(6):413-9
pubmed: 4154985
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2011 Jul;17(3):297-303
pubmed: 23573022