Appraisal of the Current Guidelines for Management of Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument.

Acute colonic obstruction Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Clinical practice guidelines

Journal

Digestive surgery
ISSN: 1421-9883
Titre abrégé: Dig Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8501808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 16 09 2020
accepted: 13 01 2021
pubmed: 24 3 2021
medline: 23 11 2021
entrez: 23 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of death with 1.4 million new cases occurring annually worldwide. High-quality clinical practice guidelines are needed to tailor high-quality individualized treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the methodological quality of the current guidelines for the management of acute malignant left-sided colonic bowel obstruction. A systematic search of the literature was carried out using electronic databases. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was used to assess the quality of each guideline. Search results returned a total of 14 guidelines appropriate for assessment. Both domain I (scope and purpose) and domain VI (editorial independence) were assessed with the same median score of 83%. The lowest scoring domain was domain V (applicability), scoring only 43%. The 2 guidelines that had the highest score were the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), each scoring 100%. However, there were significant variations in terms of quality. The NICE and New Zealand guidelines were voted unanimously for use unchanged, whilst 8 other guidelines were voted for use with modifications. Variation in guideline quality in CRC is a concern despite some clearly excellent published guidelines. All guidelines score poorly when it comes to describing how the guidelines could be applied. Lack of patient participation in guideline development is also a shortcoming that requires urgent redress.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33756480
pii: 000514446
doi: 10.1159/000514446
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

177-185

Informations de copyright

© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Paschalis Gavriilidis (P)

Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom, pgavrielidis@yahoo.com.

Alan Askari (A)

Department of Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Luton and Dunstable University Hospitals NHS Trust, Luton, United Kingdom.

Nicola de'Angelis (N)

Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.

Efstratios P Gavriilidis (EP)

First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

James Wheeler (J)

Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Justin Davies (J)

Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH