An initiative of cooperation in Zika virus research: the experience of the ZIKABRA study in Brazil.
International cooperation in health
Outbreak
Public health emergency
Zika virus
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 03 2021
23 03 2021
Historique:
received:
14
09
2020
accepted:
09
03
2021
entrez:
24
3
2021
pubmed:
25
3
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Zika virus outbreak has triggered a set of local and global actions for a rapid, effective, and timely public health response. A World Health Organization (WHO) initiative, supported by the Department of Chronic Condition Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Infections (DCCI) of the Health Surveillance Secretariat (SVS), Brazil Ministry of Health (MoH) and other public health funders, resulted in the start of the "Study on the persistence of Zika virus in body fluids of patients with ZIKV infection in Brazil - ZIKABRA study". The ZIKABRA study was designed to increase understanding of how long ZIKV persists in bodily fluids and informing best measures to prevent its transmission. Data collection began in July 2017 and the last follow up visit occurred in 06/26/2020. A framework for the ZIKABRA Cooperation initiative is provided through a description and analysis of the mechanisms, strategies and the ethos that have guided the models of international governance and technical cooperation in health for scientific exchange in the context of a public health emergency. Among the methodological strategies, we included a review of the legal documents that supported the ZIKABRA Cooperation; weekly documents produced in the meetings and working sessions; technical reports; memorandum of understanding and the research protocol. We highlight the importance of working in cooperation between different institutional actors to achieve more significant results than that obtained by each group working in isolation. In addition, we point out the advantages of training activities, ongoing supervision, the construction of local installed research capacity, training academic and non-academic human resources, improvement of laboratory equipment, knowledge transfer and the availability of the ZIKABRA study protocol for development of similar studies, favoring the collective construction of knowledge to provide public health emergency responses. Strategy harmonization; human resources and health services; timing and recruiting particularities and processing institutional clearance in the different sites can be mentioned as challenges in this type of initiative.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Zika virus outbreak has triggered a set of local and global actions for a rapid, effective, and timely public health response. A World Health Organization (WHO) initiative, supported by the Department of Chronic Condition Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Infections (DCCI) of the Health Surveillance Secretariat (SVS), Brazil Ministry of Health (MoH) and other public health funders, resulted in the start of the "Study on the persistence of Zika virus in body fluids of patients with ZIKV infection in Brazil - ZIKABRA study". The ZIKABRA study was designed to increase understanding of how long ZIKV persists in bodily fluids and informing best measures to prevent its transmission. Data collection began in July 2017 and the last follow up visit occurred in 06/26/2020.
METHODS
A framework for the ZIKABRA Cooperation initiative is provided through a description and analysis of the mechanisms, strategies and the ethos that have guided the models of international governance and technical cooperation in health for scientific exchange in the context of a public health emergency. Among the methodological strategies, we included a review of the legal documents that supported the ZIKABRA Cooperation; weekly documents produced in the meetings and working sessions; technical reports; memorandum of understanding and the research protocol.
CONCLUSION
We highlight the importance of working in cooperation between different institutional actors to achieve more significant results than that obtained by each group working in isolation. In addition, we point out the advantages of training activities, ongoing supervision, the construction of local installed research capacity, training academic and non-academic human resources, improvement of laboratory equipment, knowledge transfer and the availability of the ZIKABRA study protocol for development of similar studies, favoring the collective construction of knowledge to provide public health emergency responses. Strategy harmonization; human resources and health services; timing and recruiting particularities and processing institutional clearance in the different sites can be mentioned as challenges in this type of initiative.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33757480
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10596-0
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10596-0
pmc: PMC7985753
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
572Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 206522/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : TSA2–2017/731359–0
Pays : International
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : TSA1–2017/720873–0
Pays : International
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R21 AI139777
Pays : United States
Organisme : Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
ID : W81XWH-18-2-0040
Organisme : Brazilian Ministry of Health
ID : Convênio 837059/2016, Processo 25000162039201616
Investigateurs
André Luiz de Abreu
(AL)
Ximena Pamela Díaz Bermúdez
(XPD)
Camila Helena Aguiar Bôtto-Menezes
(CHA)
Patrícia Brasil
(P)
Carlos Alexandre Antunes Brito
(CAA)
Nathalie Jeanne Nicole Broutet
(NJN)
Guilherme Amaral Calvet
(GA)
Marcia Costa da Castilho
(MC)
Tatiana Jorge Fernandes
(TJ)
Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis
(AMB)
Rafael Freitas Oliveira Franca
(RFO)
Silvana Pereira Giozza
(SP)
Ndema Habib
(N)
Edna Oliveira Kara
(EO)
Marcus Vinicius Guimarães Lacerda
(MVG)
Sihem Landoulsi
(S)
Morganna Costa Lima
(MC)
Noemia Lima
(N)
Maeve Brito de Mello
(MB)
Robyn Meurant
(R)
Kayvon Modjarrad
(K)
Armando Menezes Neto
(AM)
Gerson Fernando Mendes Pereira
(GFM)
Cristina Pimenta
(C)
Casey Storme
(C)
Ute Ströher
(U)
Anna Thorson
(A)
Lydie Trautman
(L)
Références
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2021 Jan 25;115:e200339
pubmed: 33503145
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1666566
pubmed: 31640505
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 30;5(4):
pubmed: 33007828
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 20;375(16):1513-1523
pubmed: 27705091
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S122-S125
pubmed: 28892452
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 May;25(5):951-954
pubmed: 31002058
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1428-1437
pubmed: 26465681
J Travel Med. 2020 Jul 14;27(4):
pubmed: 32330261
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 18;9(6):e026092
pubmed: 31217315
Cell. 2019 Aug 22;178(5):1057-1071.e11
pubmed: 31442400
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 22;18(1):49
pubmed: 29357841
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 5;16(1):e0244981
pubmed: 33400705
Policy Sci. 2020;53(1):161-180
pubmed: 32226161
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):919-921
pubmed: 26921913
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Jun;23(6):1881-1890
pubmed: 29972496
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 26;19(1):1081
pubmed: 31878895
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0229790
pubmed: 32163439
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016 Apr-Jun;25(2):231-232
pubmed: 27869940
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 2;14(10):e0008612
pubmed: 33006989
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):e268-e273
pubmed: 32717208