The effects of the COVID-19 crisis on the subjective well-being of the Israeli population-monitored phase by phase.

Feelings Global life evaluation Structural change Subjective well-being

Journal

Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)
ISSN: 1046-1310
Titre abrégé: Curr Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8912263

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
accepted: 05 03 2021
pubmed: 25 3 2021
medline: 25 3 2021
entrez: 24 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The paper examined the effect of the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19 on the cognitive and affective components of subjective well-being (SWB) over time in Israel. Just before the first verified patient, we ran a survey of the general population that included questions concerning both components of SWB, self-rated health, income satisfaction, and other socio-demographic aspects. The same survey among different respondents from the same population during the lockdown period when no exit strategy had been conveyed, and for the third time when the exit strategy was publicized and began to be implemented. The findings show that the cognitive component of SWB, as measured by Cantril's Ladder, remained stable over the long term. The average respondent reported unchanged life evaluation even when the individual's negative feelings rose by 52%, and positive feelings fell by 16%. We show evidence for a structural change in the weighting of feelings and self-rated health in life satisfaction function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33758483
doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01594-x
pii: 1594
pmc: PMC7970786
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

6300-6307

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of InterestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Références

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):685-98
pubmed: 17892339
Am Psychol. 2006 May-Jun;61(4):305-14
pubmed: 16719675
Health Place. 2011 Sep;17(5):1044-53
pubmed: 21784694
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Apr;82(4):582-93
pubmed: 11999925
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112958
pubmed: 32283450
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):34-43
pubmed: 11392863
J Econ Psychol. 2014 Dec;45:84-101
pubmed: 26997688
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113045
pubmed: 32388418
Emotion. 2014 Aug;14(4):639-45
pubmed: 24749643
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):803-55
pubmed: 16351326
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):52-61
pubmed: 20565185
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213
pubmed: 32215365
J Pers. 2002 Jun;70(3):345-84
pubmed: 12049164
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 28;19(1):1555
pubmed: 31775833
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):66-75
pubmed: 18605852
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16489-93
pubmed: 20823223
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Sep;71(3):616-28
pubmed: 8831165

Auteurs

Tal Shavit (T)

The Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, Kiryat Hamada 3, Ariel, Israel.

Arie Sherman (A)

The Department of Economics, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.

Daniela Aisenberg (D)

The Clinical Psychology - Gerontology Program, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.

Classifications MeSH