Assessment of the Circulating Tumor Cells and Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Prognostic and Diagnostic Value.

circulating tumor cells colorectal cancer microsatellite instability response to treatment survival rates

Journal

OncoTargets and therapy
ISSN: 1178-6930
Titre abrégé: Onco Targets Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101514322

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 17 11 2020
accepted: 24 02 2021
entrez: 24 3 2021
pubmed: 25 3 2021
medline: 25 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) play important roles in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. CTCs and MSI were assessed in the blood and representative tumor tissues of 100 CRC patients by flow cytometry (FCM) and PCR amplification. The data were correlated to relevant clinicopathological features of the patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. MSI-high was detected in 44 (44.0%) patients, MSI-low in 37 (37%), and microsatellite stable (MSS) in 19 (19.0%) patients (P=0.007). The baseline CTCs count (<4 cells/7mL blood) was reported in 39% of the patients, and CTCs ≥4 cells/7mL blood in 61% of the patients (P=0.028). Improved PFS and OS rates were associated significantly with MSI-high (P<0.001), decreased CTC levels during the course of treatment (P<0.001) and post-treatment CTCs (P=0.008). There was no significant association between MSI-high and PFS or OS in early-stage patients (P=0.187 and P=0.187; respectively); however, it was associated significantly with better PFS and OS in late-stage patients (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only a change in serial CTC levels is considered an independent prognostic factor for OS (P<0.012). Post-treatment CTCs level, serial CTCs level changes during the course of treatment, lymph nodes and distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P<0.001, P= 0.047, P=0.001 and P<0.001; respectively). MSI and CTCs could be used as accurate, reliable and sensitive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for CRC patients' survival rates and outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Microsatellite instability (MSI) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) play important roles in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
METHODS METHODS
CTCs and MSI were assessed in the blood and representative tumor tissues of 100 CRC patients by flow cytometry (FCM) and PCR amplification. The data were correlated to relevant clinicopathological features of the patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.
RESULTS RESULTS
MSI-high was detected in 44 (44.0%) patients, MSI-low in 37 (37%), and microsatellite stable (MSS) in 19 (19.0%) patients (P=0.007). The baseline CTCs count (<4 cells/7mL blood) was reported in 39% of the patients, and CTCs ≥4 cells/7mL blood in 61% of the patients (P=0.028). Improved PFS and OS rates were associated significantly with MSI-high (P<0.001), decreased CTC levels during the course of treatment (P<0.001) and post-treatment CTCs (P=0.008). There was no significant association between MSI-high and PFS or OS in early-stage patients (P=0.187 and P=0.187; respectively); however, it was associated significantly with better PFS and OS in late-stage patients (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only a change in serial CTC levels is considered an independent prognostic factor for OS (P<0.012). Post-treatment CTCs level, serial CTCs level changes during the course of treatment, lymph nodes and distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P<0.001, P= 0.047, P=0.001 and P<0.001; respectively).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
MSI and CTCs could be used as accurate, reliable and sensitive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for CRC patients' survival rates and outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33758513
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S292551
pii: 292551
pmc: PMC7981167
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1937-1951

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Alsayed et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr Aya Alsayed reports grants from Cairo University during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest for this work.

Références

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012 Jan;12(1):99-109
pubmed: 22149436
Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(6):613-621
pubmed: 29118555
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 1;11(23):8332-40
pubmed: 16322293
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;23(11):1033-9
pubmed: 18594845
Nat Rev Cancer. 2014 Sep;14(9):623-31
pubmed: 25154812
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1680-1686
pubmed: 27370895
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Oct;46(15):2788-98
pubmed: 20627535
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 1;26(19):3213-21
pubmed: 18591556
Dig Dis. 2003;21(4):320-5
pubmed: 14752222
Gastroenterology. 2010 May;138(5):1714-26
pubmed: 20100481
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 7;17(1):725
pubmed: 29115932
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
J Mol Diagn. 2008 Jul;10(4):293-300
pubmed: 18556767
Indian J Cancer. 2016 Oct-Dec;53(4):513-517
pubmed: 28485341
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Oct 1;14(19):6302-9
pubmed: 18829513
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019 Mar-Apr;114(2):162-166
pubmed: 31060647
Semin Oncol. 2006 Jun;33(3 Suppl 9):S9-14
pubmed: 16797376
Br J Cancer. 2009 Jan 27;100(2):266-73
pubmed: 19165197
Transl Oncol. 2016 Aug;9(4):340-7
pubmed: 27567958
Eur J Cancer. 1995 Jul-Aug;31A(7-8):1222-5
pubmed: 7577026
Target Oncol. 2019 Feb;14(1):85-91
pubmed: 30659494
Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(5):690-8
pubmed: 25785486
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2016 Jan;8(1):57-84
pubmed: 26753006
Cancer Lett. 2014 Apr 28;346(1):24-33
pubmed: 24368189
BMC Cancer. 2015 Mar 30;15:202
pubmed: 25880692
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2018 Nov;16(11):735-745
pubmed: 30543589
Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 Dec;43(6):100472
pubmed: 30929752
Exp Mol Pathol. 2019 Feb;106:90-101
pubmed: 30578762
Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 29;104(7):1178-84
pubmed: 21343933
Gut. 2001 Jun;48(6):821-9
pubmed: 11358903
Ann Coloproctol. 2014 Feb;30(1):5-6
pubmed: 24639962
Adv Biomed Res. 2018 Feb 16;7:28
pubmed: 29531926
Indian J Med Res. 2016 May;143(Supplement):S104-S111
pubmed: 27748284
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):466-74
pubmed: 20008640
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Dec;51:19-26
pubmed: 27838401
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep;14(9):531-548
pubmed: 28252003
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 19;14(4):e0215513
pubmed: 31002690
Sci Rep. 2019 May 29;9(1):8032
pubmed: 31142796

Auteurs

Aya Alsayed (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11976, Egypt.

Salem E Salem (SE)

Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11976, Egypt.

Mostafa M El Serafi (MM)

Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11976, Egypt.

Mona S Abdellateif (MS)

Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cancer Biology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11976, Egypt.

Abdel-Rahman N Zekri (AN)

Molecular Virology and Immunology Unit, Cancer Biology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11976, Egypt.

Marwa Mohanad (M)

Biochemistry Department, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Manufacturing, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza, 12945, Egypt.

Abeer A Bahnassy (AA)

Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11976, Egypt.

Classifications MeSH