Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Juba, South Sudan: a population-based study.
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Mar 2021
12 Mar 2021
Historique:
entrez:
24
3
2021
pubmed:
25
3
2021
medline:
25
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Relatively few COVID-19 cases and deaths have been reported through much of sub-Saharan Africa, including South Sudan, although the extent of SARS-CoV-2 spread remains unclear due to weak surveillance systems and few population-representative serosurveys. We conducted a representative household-based cross-sectional serosurvey in Juba, South Sudan. We quantified IgG antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain and estimated seroprevalence using a Bayesian regression model accounting for test performance. We recruited 2,214 participants from August 10 to September 11, 2020 and 22.3% had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers above levels in pre-pandemic samples. After accounting for waning antibody levels, age, and sex, we estimated that 38.5% (32.1 - 46.8) of the population had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. For each RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 case, 104 (87-126) infections were unreported. Background antibody reactivity was higher in pre-pandemic samples from Juba compared to Boston, where the serological test was validated. The estimated proportion of the population infected ranged from 30.1% to 60.6% depending on assumptions about test performance and prevalence of clinically severe infections. SARS-CoV-2 has spread extensively within Juba. Validation of serological tests in sub-Saharan African populations is critical to improve our ability to use serosurveillance to understand and mitigate transmission.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Relatively few COVID-19 cases and deaths have been reported through much of sub-Saharan Africa, including South Sudan, although the extent of SARS-CoV-2 spread remains unclear due to weak surveillance systems and few population-representative serosurveys.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a representative household-based cross-sectional serosurvey in Juba, South Sudan. We quantified IgG antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain and estimated seroprevalence using a Bayesian regression model accounting for test performance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We recruited 2,214 participants from August 10 to September 11, 2020 and 22.3% had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers above levels in pre-pandemic samples. After accounting for waning antibody levels, age, and sex, we estimated that 38.5% (32.1 - 46.8) of the population had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. For each RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 case, 104 (87-126) infections were unreported. Background antibody reactivity was higher in pre-pandemic samples from Juba compared to Boston, where the serological test was validated. The estimated proportion of the population infected ranged from 30.1% to 60.6% depending on assumptions about test performance and prevalence of clinically severe infections.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
SARS-CoV-2 has spread extensively within Juba. Validation of serological tests in sub-Saharan African populations is critical to improve our ability to use serosurveillance to understand and mitigate transmission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33758900
doi: 10.1101/2021.03.08.21253009
pmc: PMC7987059
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI135115
Pays : United States
Organisme : ACL HHS
ID : U01CK000490
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateIn
Références
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):
pubmed: 33261717
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Dec;29:100651
pubmed: 33235985
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):420-422
pubmed: 32085846
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 27;72(2):301-308
pubmed: 33501951
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):313-319
pubmed: 32534626
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0242124
pubmed: 33166369
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jan 29;12(1):e0006196
pubmed: 29377882
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1;175(2):143-156
pubmed: 32975552
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Mar 5;:
pubmed: 33666297
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Mar 18;:
pubmed: 33735104
Science. 2020 Aug 7;369(6504):624-626
pubmed: 32764055
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;101:220-225
pubmed: 33031941
Sci Immunol. 2020 Oct 8;5(52):
pubmed: 33033172
J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 9;222(11):1772-1775
pubmed: 32856712
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb 17;:
pubmed: 33609481
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;27(3):928-931
pubmed: 33350923
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb;147(2):545-557.e9
pubmed: 33221383
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):447-453
pubmed: 33531710
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:577-583
pubmed: 33176202
BMJ. 2021 Feb 17;372:n334
pubmed: 33597166
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jan;104(1):91-94
pubmed: 33185181