Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of an Ambrosia Beetle to Volatiles of its Nutritional Fungal Symbiont.
Animals
Ascomycota
/ metabolism
Behavior, Animal
Benzoates
/ chemistry
Biological Evolution
Electrophysiological Phenomena
Ethanol
/ chemistry
Female
Fusarium
/ metabolism
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Hexanols
/ chemistry
Insect Control
Pentanols
/ chemistry
Pheromones
/ chemistry
Solid Phase Microextraction
Symbiosis
Volatile Organic Compounds
/ chemistry
Weevils
Ambrosiella grosmanniae
Fungal volatiles
Symbiosis
Xylosandrus germanus
Journal
Journal of chemical ecology
ISSN: 1573-1561
Titre abrégé: J Chem Ecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
17
12
2020
accepted:
02
03
2021
revised:
23
02
2021
pubmed:
25
3
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
24
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) cultivate their fungal symbiont within host substrates as the sole source of nutrition on which the larvae and adults must feed. To investigate a possible role for semiochemicals in this interaction, we characterized electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Xylosandrus germanus to volatiles associated with its fungal symbiont Ambrosiella grosmanniae. During still-air walking bioassays, X. germanus exhibited an arrestment response to volatiles of A. grosmanniae, but not antagonistic fungi Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium brunneum, Trichoderma harzianum, the plant pathogen Fusarium proliferatum, or malt extract agar. Solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry identified 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 2-phenylethanol, methyl benzoate and 3-methyl-1-butanol in emissions from A. grosmanniae; the latter two compounds were also detected in emissions from B. bassiana. Concentration-responses using electroantennography documented weak depolarizations to A. grosmanniae fungal volatiles, unlike the comparatively strong response to ethanol. When tested singly in walking bioassays, volatiles identified from A. grosmanniae elicited relatively weak arrestment responses, unlike the responses to ethanol. Xylosandrus germanus also exhibited weak or no long-range attraction to the fungal volatiles when tested singly during field trials in 2016-2018. None of the fungal volatiles enhanced attraction of X. germanus to ethanol when tested singly; in contrast, 2-phenylethanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol consistently reduced attraction to ethanol. Volatiles emitted by A. grosmanniae may represent short-range olfactory cues that could aid in distinguishing their nutritional fungal symbiont from other fungi, but these compounds are not likely to be useful as long-range attractants for improving detection or mass trapping tactics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33761047
doi: 10.1007/s10886-021-01263-0
pii: 10.1007/s10886-021-01263-0
pmc: PMC8116273
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzoates
0
Hexanols
0
Pentanols
0
Pheromones
0
Volatile Organic Compounds
0
insect attractants
0
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
methyl benzoate
6618K1VJ9T
isopentyl alcohol
DEM9NIT1J4
2-ethylhexanol
XZV7TAA77P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
463-475Références
Plant Physiol. 1982 Apr;69(4):840-7
pubmed: 16662306
Annu Rev Entomol. 1996;41:353-74
pubmed: 15012333
ISME J. 2015 Jan;9(1):126-38
pubmed: 25083930
J Chem Ecol. 2011 May;37(5):483-91
pubmed: 21526361
J Econ Entomol. 2005 Dec;98(6):2067-78
pubmed: 16539134
Zookeys. 2018 Jun 19;(768):19-68
pubmed: 29955211
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;36(5):263-7
pubmed: 12680935
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Apr;104(2):574-9
pubmed: 21510207
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1068:157-77
pubmed: 24014360
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Dec;103(6):2094-9
pubmed: 21309230
J Chem Ecol. 2011 Dec;37(12):1374-7
pubmed: 22161224
Commun Integr Biol. 2008;1(2):167-9
pubmed: 19704882
Annu Rev Entomol. 2017 Jan 31;62:285-303
pubmed: 27860522
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Feb;108(1):183-91
pubmed: 26470119
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39(2):139-93
pubmed: 19204852
Environ Entomol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1597-605
pubmed: 23321108
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 02;10(7):e0131496
pubmed: 26134522
Microbiol Res. 2008;163(2):148-51
pubmed: 16733086
Analyst. 2006 Jan;131(1):24-32
pubmed: 16365659
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Oct 1;110(5):2149-2164
pubmed: 29048587
Microbiol Res. 2018 Sep;214:129-136
pubmed: 30031475
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 01;11(9):e0162197
pubmed: 27583519
Fungal Biol. 2015 Nov;119(11):1075-1092
pubmed: 26466881
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 24;115(17):4447-4452
pubmed: 29632193
J Chem Ecol. 2013 Jul;39(7):840-59
pubmed: 23793954
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 11;108(41):17064-9
pubmed: 21969580