Added value of computed tomography fractional flow reserve in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Aged
Clinical Decision-Making
Computed Tomography Angiography
/ methods
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnosis
Disease Management
Electrocardiography
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Workflow
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 03 2021
24 03 2021
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
accepted:
21
01
2021
entrez:
25
3
2021
pubmed:
26
3
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multiple non-invasive tests are performed to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD), but all are limited to either anatomical or functional assessments. Computed tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) based on patient-specific lumped parameter models is a new test combining both characteristics simulating invasive FFR. This study aims to evaluate the added value of CT-FFR over other non-invasive tests to diagnose CAD. Patients with clinical suspicion of angina pectoris between 2010 and 2011 were included in this cross-sectional study. All underwent stress electrocardiography (X-ECG), SPECT, CT coronary angiography (CCTA) and CT-FFR. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and FFR were used as reference standard. Five models mimicking the clinical workflow were fitted and the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used for comparison. 44% of the patients included in the analysis had a FFR of ≤ 0.80. The basic model including pre-test-likelihood and X-ECG had an AUROC of 0.79. The SPECT-strategy had an AUROC of 0.90 (p = 0.008), CCTA-strategy of 0.88 (p < 0.001), 0.93 when adding CT-FFR (p = 0.40) compared to 0.94 when combining CCTA and SPECT. This study shows adding on-site CT-FFR based on patient-specific lumped parameter models leads to an increased AUROC compared to the basic model. It improves the diagnostic work-up beyond SPECT or CCTA and is non-inferior to the combined strategy of SPECT and CCTA in the diagnosis of hemodynamically relevant CAD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33762686
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86245-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-86245-8
pmc: PMC7991632
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6748Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 16;52(25):2135-44
pubmed: 19095130
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;63(12):1145-1155
pubmed: 24486266
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1316-1325
pubmed: 30219398
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul;2(4):290-8
pubmed: 19808609
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3359-67
pubmed: 26330417
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84
pubmed: 20537493
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;121(1):9-13
pubmed: 29103607
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2315-2323
pubmed: 26475205
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug;10(4):269-81
pubmed: 27318587
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 1;38(13):991-998
pubmed: 27141095
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):803-810
pubmed: 28538960
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;15(11):1281-8
pubmed: 25073595
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1724-32
pubmed: 19007693
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;13(4):994-1004
pubmed: 31422146
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 15;99(4):450-6
pubmed: 17293182
Eur Heart J. 2014 Mar;35(10):633-8
pubmed: 24375074
Circulation. 2014 Nov 4;130(19):1749-67
pubmed: 25070666
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jan 22;73(2):161-173
pubmed: 30654888
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1009-1017
pubmed: 26117471
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19):1989-97
pubmed: 22032711
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec;10(6):435-449
pubmed: 27780758
Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(38):2949-3003
pubmed: 23996286
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477
pubmed: 31504439
N Engl J Med. 1979 Jun 14;300(24):1350-8
pubmed: 440357
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Aug 1;90(3):210-5
pubmed: 12127605
JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1237-45
pubmed: 22922562
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259
pubmed: 29785878